Older Adults' Preferences Regarding Firearm Locking Device Use: Results of a National Survey.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Clinical Gerontologist Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-23 DOI:10.1080/07317115.2023.2285994
Ricardo I Villarreal, Ian H Stanley, Michael D Anestis, Jessica Buck-Atkinson, Marian E Betz
{"title":"Older Adults' Preferences Regarding Firearm Locking Device Use: Results of a National Survey.","authors":"Ricardo I Villarreal, Ian H Stanley, Michael D Anestis, Jessica Buck-Atkinson, Marian E Betz","doi":"10.1080/07317115.2023.2285994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Use of firearm locking devices may reduce the risk of suicide and injury among older adults. This study describes older adults' preferences when choosing a firearm locking device.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a secondary analysis of a nationally representative survey of US adult firearm owners (<i>N</i> = 2,152). We compared older adults (≥65y) with relatively younger adults (<65y), stratified by self-reported gender.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top three factors cited as impacting firearm locking device selection included speed (53.6%) and ease of firearm access from device (52.4%), and cost of the device (28.7%). These top factors were comparable for all adults across genders. A larger proportion of older vs younger males reported that a primary preference was whether the device allows the firearm to remain loaded with ammunition; smaller proportions of older vs younger males reported strength of device (device durability) and costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preference among older adults, particularly older males, for locking devices that maintain the firearms easy to access - especially, loaded with ammunition - might impact firearm injury prevention efforts for this high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>For harm reduction, use of any firearm locking device may reduce the risk of firearm injury or death. Clinicians are encouraged to explore reasons for locking device selection within motivational interviewing frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":10376,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gerontologist","volume":" ","pages":"583-593"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gerontologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2023.2285994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Use of firearm locking devices may reduce the risk of suicide and injury among older adults. This study describes older adults' preferences when choosing a firearm locking device.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a nationally representative survey of US adult firearm owners (N = 2,152). We compared older adults (≥65y) with relatively younger adults (<65y), stratified by self-reported gender.

Results: The top three factors cited as impacting firearm locking device selection included speed (53.6%) and ease of firearm access from device (52.4%), and cost of the device (28.7%). These top factors were comparable for all adults across genders. A larger proportion of older vs younger males reported that a primary preference was whether the device allows the firearm to remain loaded with ammunition; smaller proportions of older vs younger males reported strength of device (device durability) and costs.

Conclusions: Preference among older adults, particularly older males, for locking devices that maintain the firearms easy to access - especially, loaded with ammunition - might impact firearm injury prevention efforts for this high-risk group.

Clinical implications: For harm reduction, use of any firearm locking device may reduce the risk of firearm injury or death. Clinicians are encouraged to explore reasons for locking device selection within motivational interviewing frameworks.

老年人对枪支锁定装置使用的偏好:一项全国调查的结果。
目的:使用枪支锁定装置可以降低老年人自杀和受伤的风险。这项研究描述了老年人在选择枪支锁定装置时的偏好。方法:我们对一项具有全国代表性的美国成年枪支拥有者调查(N = 2152)进行了二次分析。我们比较了年龄≥65岁的老年人和相对年轻的成年人。结果:影响枪支锁定装置选择的前三大因素包括速度(53.6%)、枪支获取的便利性(52.4%)和装置的成本(28.7%)。这些最重要的因素对所有成年人不分性别都具有可比性。与年轻男性相比,更大比例的老年男性报告说,他们的主要偏好是该装置是否允许枪支保持弹药;报告设备强度(设备耐用性)和成本的老年男性比例低于年轻男性。结论:老年人,尤其是老年男性,对锁定装置的偏好,使枪支易于接触-特别是,装载弹药-可能会影响这一高危人群的枪支伤害预防工作。临床意义:为了减少伤害,使用任何枪支锁定装置都可以减少枪支伤害或死亡的风险。鼓励临床医生在动机性访谈框架内探索锁定装置选择的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Gerontologist
Clinical Gerontologist GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
25.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Gerontologist presents original research, reviews, and clinical comments relevant to the needs of behavioral health professionals and all practitioners who work with older adults. Published in cooperation with Psychologists in Long Term Care, the journal is designed for psychologists, physicians, nurses, social workers, counselors (family, pastoral, and vocational), and other health professionals who address behavioral health concerns found in later life, including: -adjustments to changing roles- issues related to diversity and aging- family caregiving- spirituality- cognitive and psychosocial assessment- depression, anxiety, and PTSD- Alzheimer’s disease and other neurocognitive disorders- long term care- behavioral medicine in aging- rehabilitation and education for older adults. Each issue provides insightful articles on current topics. Submissions are peer reviewed by content experts and selected for both scholarship and relevance to the practitioner to ensure that the articles are among the best in the field. Authors report original research and conceptual reviews. A unique column in Clinical Gerontologist is “Clinical Comments." This section features brief observations and specific suggestions from practitioners which avoid elaborate research designs or long reference lists. This section is a unique opportunity for you to learn about the valuable clinical work of your peers in a short, concise format.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信