Clopyralid applied with sponge wiper for Cirsium arvense control in hops in the western United States

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Luisa Baccin, Marcelo L. Moretti
{"title":"Clopyralid applied with sponge wiper for Cirsium arvense control in hops in the western United States","authors":"Luisa Baccin,&nbsp;Marcelo L. Moretti","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><em>Cirsium arvense</em></span><span><span> L. (Canada thistle) is an important weed species commonly found in perennial crops. In </span>hop production, the management of </span><em>C. arvense</em> is largely herbicide-based. Field studies were conducted in 2019 and 2020 in mature hopyards in Independence, OR, to compare <em>C. arvense</em><span><span> control in hops using a spray or targeted application of herbicides. Treatments included applying the herbicides immediately after training hops, four weeks later, or at both times. Treatments were applied as sprays directed to the base of hop plants with clopyralid or as target applications of clopyralid or </span>glyphosate with a sponge wiper. Hop injury and weed control were evaluated 28 and 56 days after initial treatment. Herbicide residue in cones was quantified, and treatment costs were compared. Clopyralid did not injure hops, but wiper applications of glyphosate resulted in crop injury. The targeted application of clopyralid by wiper was as effective as the spray application. No differences were observed when clopyralid was applied after training or 28 days later, but two applications outperformed a single application. Clopyralid provided better control of </span><em>C. arvense</em> than glyphosate. Clopyralid hops cone levels were below the quantitation limit in both years (0.01 ppm). A partial cost analysis indicates that the targeted application of clopyralid with the wiper was 37% less costly than the spray application of clopyralid. The cost reduction was primarily driven by 84% reduced clopyralid use, and savings with the wiper application are likely to be exacerbated in a low infestation and patchy distribution of <em>C. arvense</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 106518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121942300340X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cirsium arvense L. (Canada thistle) is an important weed species commonly found in perennial crops. In hop production, the management of C. arvense is largely herbicide-based. Field studies were conducted in 2019 and 2020 in mature hopyards in Independence, OR, to compare C. arvense control in hops using a spray or targeted application of herbicides. Treatments included applying the herbicides immediately after training hops, four weeks later, or at both times. Treatments were applied as sprays directed to the base of hop plants with clopyralid or as target applications of clopyralid or glyphosate with a sponge wiper. Hop injury and weed control were evaluated 28 and 56 days after initial treatment. Herbicide residue in cones was quantified, and treatment costs were compared. Clopyralid did not injure hops, but wiper applications of glyphosate resulted in crop injury. The targeted application of clopyralid by wiper was as effective as the spray application. No differences were observed when clopyralid was applied after training or 28 days later, but two applications outperformed a single application. Clopyralid provided better control of C. arvense than glyphosate. Clopyralid hops cone levels were below the quantitation limit in both years (0.01 ppm). A partial cost analysis indicates that the targeted application of clopyralid with the wiper was 37% less costly than the spray application of clopyralid. The cost reduction was primarily driven by 84% reduced clopyralid use, and savings with the wiper application are likely to be exacerbated in a low infestation and patchy distribution of C. arvense.

氯吡唑啉与海绵雨刷一起应用于美国西部啤酒花中的茜草枯病防治
加拿大蓟(Cirsium arvense L.)是常见于多年生作物中的一种重要杂草。在啤酒花的生产中,管理主要以除草剂为基础。2019年和2020年,在俄勒冈州独立的成熟啤酒花园中进行了实地研究,比较了使用喷洒除草剂或定向使用除草剂对啤酒花中的阿氏弧菌的控制。处理方法包括在训练后立即施用除草剂,四周后施用,或两次施用。使用氯吡唑啉直接喷洒在啤酒花根部,或使用海绵雨刷靶向喷洒氯吡唑啉或草甘膦。初步处理后28和56 d对啤酒花损伤和杂草控制进行评价。对球果除草剂残留量进行了定量分析,并对处理费用进行了比较。氯吡唑啉对啤酒花没有伤害,但草甘膦的快速施用会对作物造成伤害。氯吡唑啉用雨刷定向施药效果与喷雾施药效果相当。当训练后或28天后应用氯吡啉时,没有观察到差异,但两次应用优于单一应用。氯吡唑啉的防治效果优于草甘膦。两年份酒花锥虫苷含量均低于定量限(0.01 ppm)。部分成本分析表明,与雨刷器一起靶向应用氯吡酯比喷雾应用氯吡酯成本低37%。降低成本的主要原因是氯吡啉的使用减少了84%,并且在低侵袭和斑片分布的情况下,使用雨刷可能会加剧成本的降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop Protection
Crop Protection 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
200
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics: -Abiotic damage- Agronomic control methods- Assessment of pest and disease damage- Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases- Biological control- Biorational pesticides- Control of animal pests of world crops- Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms- Control of weeds and integrated management- Economic considerations- Effects of plant growth regulators- Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use- Environmental effects of pesticides- Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control- GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications- Importance and control of postharvest crop losses- Integrated control- Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies- Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection- Pesticide application methods- Pest management- Phytobiomes for pest and disease control- Resistance management- Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信