{"title":"Clopyralid applied with sponge wiper for Cirsium arvense control in hops in the western United States","authors":"Luisa Baccin, Marcelo L. Moretti","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><em>Cirsium arvense</em></span><span><span> L. (Canada thistle) is an important weed species commonly found in perennial crops. In </span>hop production, the management of </span><em>C. arvense</em> is largely herbicide-based. Field studies were conducted in 2019 and 2020 in mature hopyards in Independence, OR, to compare <em>C. arvense</em><span><span> control in hops using a spray or targeted application of herbicides. Treatments included applying the herbicides immediately after training hops, four weeks later, or at both times. Treatments were applied as sprays directed to the base of hop plants with clopyralid or as target applications of clopyralid or </span>glyphosate with a sponge wiper. Hop injury and weed control were evaluated 28 and 56 days after initial treatment. Herbicide residue in cones was quantified, and treatment costs were compared. Clopyralid did not injure hops, but wiper applications of glyphosate resulted in crop injury. The targeted application of clopyralid by wiper was as effective as the spray application. No differences were observed when clopyralid was applied after training or 28 days later, but two applications outperformed a single application. Clopyralid provided better control of </span><em>C. arvense</em> than glyphosate. Clopyralid hops cone levels were below the quantitation limit in both years (0.01 ppm). A partial cost analysis indicates that the targeted application of clopyralid with the wiper was 37% less costly than the spray application of clopyralid. The cost reduction was primarily driven by 84% reduced clopyralid use, and savings with the wiper application are likely to be exacerbated in a low infestation and patchy distribution of <em>C. arvense</em>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 106518"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026121942300340X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cirsium arvense L. (Canada thistle) is an important weed species commonly found in perennial crops. In hop production, the management of C. arvense is largely herbicide-based. Field studies were conducted in 2019 and 2020 in mature hopyards in Independence, OR, to compare C. arvense control in hops using a spray or targeted application of herbicides. Treatments included applying the herbicides immediately after training hops, four weeks later, or at both times. Treatments were applied as sprays directed to the base of hop plants with clopyralid or as target applications of clopyralid or glyphosate with a sponge wiper. Hop injury and weed control were evaluated 28 and 56 days after initial treatment. Herbicide residue in cones was quantified, and treatment costs were compared. Clopyralid did not injure hops, but wiper applications of glyphosate resulted in crop injury. The targeted application of clopyralid by wiper was as effective as the spray application. No differences were observed when clopyralid was applied after training or 28 days later, but two applications outperformed a single application. Clopyralid provided better control of C. arvense than glyphosate. Clopyralid hops cone levels were below the quantitation limit in both years (0.01 ppm). A partial cost analysis indicates that the targeted application of clopyralid with the wiper was 37% less costly than the spray application of clopyralid. The cost reduction was primarily driven by 84% reduced clopyralid use, and savings with the wiper application are likely to be exacerbated in a low infestation and patchy distribution of C. arvense.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.