Evaluation of Color and Translucency of Stained and Glazed Monolithic Lithium Disilicates and Zirconia After Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices and Thermocycling.
Bruno Arruda Mascaro, Jean-Pierre Salomon, Marina Santos Demartine, Tassiane Caroline Nicola, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis
{"title":"Evaluation of Color and Translucency of Stained and Glazed Monolithic Lithium Disilicates and Zirconia After Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices and Thermocycling.","authors":"Bruno Arruda Mascaro, Jean-Pierre Salomon, Marina Santos Demartine, Tassiane Caroline Nicola, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate changes in color and translucency of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia after toothbrushing with conventional or whitening dentifrices followed by thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Samples (n = 20/material) from CAD/CAM (IPS e.max CAD [EC]) and pressable (IPS e.max Press [EP]) lithium disilicates and 5Y-PSZ zirconia (Prettau 4 Anterior [PA]) were prepared and received staining and glazing procedures. Aging was performed by toothbrushing with conventional (n = 10) or whitening (n = 10) dentifrices, followed by thermocycling simulating 5, 10, and 15 years. Color coordinates L*, a*, b*, , and C* and h° values were assessed with a spectrophotometer at baseline and after each aging period to calculate color changes (ΔE00), lightness (ΔL*), and translucency parameter (TP). Data were analyzed using three-way repeated measures ANOVA's followed by Sidak post-hoc test (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing the dentifrices, EC and EP produced the greatest ΔE00 after 15 years with the whitening dentifrice (P < .05). Regardless of the dentifrice, PA showed greater ΔE00 than EC after 10 years (P < .05). When comparing the aging periods, EC and PA did not show differences in ΔE00 for both dentifrices (P ≥ .05). EC and EP produced an increased ΔL* after 15 years in the whitening group (P < .05). In the whitening groups, the ΔL* values of PA differ (P < .005) from those of lithium disilicates. Regardless of the experimental group, the TP values followed the inequality: PA < EC < EP (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the color of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia changed under aging with greater effects for whitening dentifrice. Aging did not influence translucency.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"423-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate changes in color and translucency of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia after toothbrushing with conventional or whitening dentifrices followed by thermocycling.
Materials and methods: Samples (n = 20/material) from CAD/CAM (IPS e.max CAD [EC]) and pressable (IPS e.max Press [EP]) lithium disilicates and 5Y-PSZ zirconia (Prettau 4 Anterior [PA]) were prepared and received staining and glazing procedures. Aging was performed by toothbrushing with conventional (n = 10) or whitening (n = 10) dentifrices, followed by thermocycling simulating 5, 10, and 15 years. Color coordinates L*, a*, b*, , and C* and h° values were assessed with a spectrophotometer at baseline and after each aging period to calculate color changes (ΔE00), lightness (ΔL*), and translucency parameter (TP). Data were analyzed using three-way repeated measures ANOVA's followed by Sidak post-hoc test (α = .05).
Results: When comparing the dentifrices, EC and EP produced the greatest ΔE00 after 15 years with the whitening dentifrice (P < .05). Regardless of the dentifrice, PA showed greater ΔE00 than EC after 10 years (P < .05). When comparing the aging periods, EC and PA did not show differences in ΔE00 for both dentifrices (P ≥ .05). EC and EP produced an increased ΔL* after 15 years in the whitening group (P < .05). In the whitening groups, the ΔL* values of PA differ (P < .005) from those of lithium disilicates. Regardless of the experimental group, the TP values followed the inequality: PA < EC < EP (P < .05).
Conclusions: Overall, the color of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia changed under aging with greater effects for whitening dentifrice. Aging did not influence translucency.