Evaluation of Color and Translucency of Stained and Glazed Monolithic Lithium Disilicates and Zirconia After Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices and Thermocycling.

Bruno Arruda Mascaro, Jean-Pierre Salomon, Marina Santos Demartine, Tassiane Caroline Nicola, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis
{"title":"Evaluation of Color and Translucency of Stained and Glazed Monolithic Lithium Disilicates and Zirconia After Toothbrushing with Different Dentifrices and Thermocycling.","authors":"Bruno Arruda Mascaro, Jean-Pierre Salomon, Marina Santos Demartine, Tassiane Caroline Nicola, José Maurício Dos Santos Nunes Reis","doi":"10.11607/ijp.8495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate changes in color and translucency of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia after toothbrushing with conventional or whitening dentifrices followed by thermocycling.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Samples (n &#61; 20/material) from CAD/CAM (IPS e.max CAD [EC]) and pressable (IPS e.max Press [EP]) lithium disilicates and 5Y-PSZ zirconia (Prettau 4 Anterior [PA]) were prepared and received staining and glazing procedures. Aging was performed by toothbrushing with conventional (n &#61; 10) or whitening (n &#61; 10) dentifrices, followed by thermocycling simulating 5, 10, and 15 years. Color coordinates L*, a*, b*, , and C* and h° values were assessed with a spectrophotometer at baseline and after each aging period to calculate color changes (ΔE00), lightness (ΔL*), and translucency parameter (TP). Data were analyzed using three-way repeated measures ANOVA's followed by Sidak post-hoc test (α &#61; .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When comparing the dentifrices, EC and EP produced the greatest ΔE00 after 15 years with the whitening dentifrice (P < .05). Regardless of the dentifrice, PA showed greater ΔE00 than EC after 10 years (P < .05). When comparing the aging periods, EC and PA did not show differences in ΔE00 for both dentifrices (P ≥ .05). EC and EP produced an increased ΔL* after 15 years in the whitening group (P < .05). In the whitening groups, the ΔL* values of PA differ (P < .005) from those of lithium disilicates. Regardless of the experimental group, the TP values followed the inequality: PA < EC < EP (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, the color of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia changed under aging with greater effects for whitening dentifrice. Aging did not influence translucency.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.8495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate changes in color and translucency of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia after toothbrushing with conventional or whitening dentifrices followed by thermocycling.

Materials and methods: Samples (n = 20/material) from CAD/CAM (IPS e.max CAD [EC]) and pressable (IPS e.max Press [EP]) lithium disilicates and 5Y-PSZ zirconia (Prettau 4 Anterior [PA]) were prepared and received staining and glazing procedures. Aging was performed by toothbrushing with conventional (n = 10) or whitening (n = 10) dentifrices, followed by thermocycling simulating 5, 10, and 15 years. Color coordinates L*, a*, b*, , and C* and h° values were assessed with a spectrophotometer at baseline and after each aging period to calculate color changes (ΔE00), lightness (ΔL*), and translucency parameter (TP). Data were analyzed using three-way repeated measures ANOVA's followed by Sidak post-hoc test (α = .05).

Results: When comparing the dentifrices, EC and EP produced the greatest ΔE00 after 15 years with the whitening dentifrice (P < .05). Regardless of the dentifrice, PA showed greater ΔE00 than EC after 10 years (P < .05). When comparing the aging periods, EC and PA did not show differences in ΔE00 for both dentifrices (P ≥ .05). EC and EP produced an increased ΔL* after 15 years in the whitening group (P < .05). In the whitening groups, the ΔL* values of PA differ (P < .005) from those of lithium disilicates. Regardless of the experimental group, the TP values followed the inequality: PA < EC < EP (P < .05).

Conclusions: Overall, the color of stained and glazed monolithic lithium disilicates and zirconia changed under aging with greater effects for whitening dentifrice. Aging did not influence translucency.

不同牙膏和热循环对染色和釉面单片硅酸锂和氧化锆刷牙后颜色和透明度的评价。
目的:评价染色和釉面的单片硅酸锂和氧化锆在常规牙膏和美白牙膏刷牙后的颜色和透明度的变化。材料和方法:从CAD/CAM (IPS e.max CAD[EC])和可压(IPS e.max Press[EP])制备样品(n=20/材料)和4Y-TZP氧化锆(Prettau 4 Anterior[PA])进行染色和上光处理。使用常规牙膏(n=10)或美白牙膏(n=10)进行老化,然后进行热循环,模拟5年、10年和15年。颜色坐标L*, a*, b*, C*和h°值在基线和每个老化期后用分光光度计评估,以计算颜色(ΔE00),亮度(ΔL*)和半透明(tp)的变化。数据采用3-way重复测量方差分析,然后进行Sidak事后检验(α= 0.05)。结果:与美白牙液比较,15年后EC和EP产生的效果最大ΔE00 (p)结论:总体而言,染色/釉面整体硅酸锂和氧化锆随着老化的变化,其美白牙液的效果更大。老化对透光性没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信