Sex differences in radiation research.

Lanyn P Taliaferro, Rajeev K Agarwal, C Norman Coleman, Andrea L DiCarlo, Kimberly A Hofmeyer, Shannon G Loelius, Olivia Molinar-Inglis, Dana C Tedesco, Merriline M Satyamitra
{"title":"Sex differences in radiation research.","authors":"Lanyn P Taliaferro, Rajeev K Agarwal, C Norman Coleman, Andrea L DiCarlo, Kimberly A Hofmeyer, Shannon G Loelius, Olivia Molinar-Inglis, Dana C Tedesco, Merriline M Satyamitra","doi":"10.1080/09553002.2023.2283089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The <i>Sex Differences in Radiation Research</i> workshop addressed the role of sex as a confounder in radiation research and its implication in real-world radiological and nuclear applications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In April 2022, HHS-wide partners from the Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program, the Office of Research on Women's Health National Institutes of Health Office of Women's Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures Branch at the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority conducted a workshop to address the scientific implication and knowledge gaps in understanding sex in basic and translational research. The goals of this workshop were to examine sex differences in 1. Radiation animal models and understand how these may affect radiation medical countermeasure development; 2. Biodosimetry and/or biomarkers used to assess acute radiation syndrome, delayed effects of acute radiation exposure, and/or predict major organ morbidities; 3. medical research that lacks representation from both sexes. In addition, regulatory policies that influence inclusion of women in research, and the gaps that exist in drug development and device clearance were discussed. Finally, real-world sex differences in human health scenarios were also considered.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This report provides an overview of the two-day workshop, and open discussion among academic investigators, industry researchers, and U.S. government representatives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meeting highlighted that current study designs lack the power to determine statistical significance based on sex, and much is unknown about the underlying factors that contribute to these differences. Investigators should accommodate both sexes in all stages of research to ensure that the outcome is robust, reproducible, and accurate, and will benefit public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":94057,"journal":{"name":"International journal of radiation biology","volume":" ","pages":"466-485"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10922591/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of radiation biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2023.2283089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Sex Differences in Radiation Research workshop addressed the role of sex as a confounder in radiation research and its implication in real-world radiological and nuclear applications.

Methods: In April 2022, HHS-wide partners from the Radiation and Nuclear Countermeasures Program, the Office of Research on Women's Health National Institutes of Health Office of Women's Health, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Radiological and Nuclear Countermeasures Branch at the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority conducted a workshop to address the scientific implication and knowledge gaps in understanding sex in basic and translational research. The goals of this workshop were to examine sex differences in 1. Radiation animal models and understand how these may affect radiation medical countermeasure development; 2. Biodosimetry and/or biomarkers used to assess acute radiation syndrome, delayed effects of acute radiation exposure, and/or predict major organ morbidities; 3. medical research that lacks representation from both sexes. In addition, regulatory policies that influence inclusion of women in research, and the gaps that exist in drug development and device clearance were discussed. Finally, real-world sex differences in human health scenarios were also considered.

Results: This report provides an overview of the two-day workshop, and open discussion among academic investigators, industry researchers, and U.S. government representatives.

Conclusions: This meeting highlighted that current study designs lack the power to determine statistical significance based on sex, and much is unknown about the underlying factors that contribute to these differences. Investigators should accommodate both sexes in all stages of research to ensure that the outcome is robust, reproducible, and accurate, and will benefit public health.

会议报告辐射研究中的性别差异。
目的:辐射研究中的性别差异讲习班讨论了性别在辐射研究中作为混杂因素的作用及其在现实世界放射和核应用中的意义。方法:2022年4月,来自hhs范围内的辐射与核对策项目、妇女健康研究办公室、国家卫生研究院妇女健康办公室、美国食品和药物管理局以及生物医学高级研究与发展管理局的辐射与核对策部门的合作伙伴举办了一次研讨会,以解决在基础研究和转化研究中理解性别的科学含义和知识差距。这次研讨会的目的是研究1。辐射动物模型并了解这些模型如何影响辐射医学对策的发展;2. 用于评估急性辐射综合征、急性辐射暴露的延迟效应和/或预测主要器官病变的生物剂量学和/或生物标志物;3.缺乏男女代表的医学研究。此外,还讨论了影响妇女参与研究的监管政策,以及药物开发和器械审批方面存在的差距。最后,还考虑了现实世界中人类健康状况的性别差异。结果:本报告概述了为期两天的研讨会,以及学术研究人员、行业研究人员和美国政府代表之间的公开讨论。结论:本次会议强调,目前的研究设计缺乏确定基于性别的统计显著性的能力,造成这些差异的潜在因素还有很多未知之处。调查人员应在研究的所有阶段考虑两性,以确保结果是可靠的、可重复的和准确的,并将有利于公共卫生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信