The Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on the Micro-Tensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin-Based Blocks to Resin Cement.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
C Soler-Tornero, M M Mutluay
{"title":"The Effect of Different Decontamination Methods on the Micro-Tensile Bond Strength of CAD/CAM Resin-Based Blocks to Resin Cement.","authors":"C Soler-Tornero, M M Mutluay","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2588Soler-Tornero13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluates the impact of decontamination methods on Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) between resin cement and resin blocks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty CAD/CAM resin blocks from two manufacturers were wet-polished, sandblasted, and ultrasonically cleaned. After blood and saliva contamination, blocks were divided into subgroups: control, water rinsing, acid etching, alkaline cleaning paste, or 10-MDP containing cleaner. Resin-based cement was then applied. After 24 hours, the blocks were sectioned to obtain bars for testing. Half of the specimens were tested immediately for μTBS, and the other half underwent artificial aging. The surfaces of the blocks were inspected with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Three-way ANOVA was performed for μTBS values (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In one of the substrates, the positive control subgroup obtained the highest value (56,01 MPa, SD:6,96) followed by 10-MDP cleaner and universal cleaning paste, when immediately tested, with significant differences respect to the water rinsing (p⟨0.041) and acid etching (p⟨0.048) groups. After thermocycling, higher values were found in the 10-MDP cleaner (47,57 MPa, SD:8,15), but differences were not significant. In the other substrate group, the 10-MDP cleaner subgroup showed highest bond strengths (64,46 MPa SD: 10,92) at the initial test. After thermocycling, 10-MDP cleaner (58,66 MPa, SD: 9,93) gave the highest μTBS value. Significant differences between water rinsing group and the rest of subgroups (p⟨0.001), and between 10-MDP cleaner and the positive control group (p⟨0.006) were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cleaning after contamination improves bonding. 10-MDP containing cleaner can help to restore initial μTBS value and maintain it in the long-term.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2588Soler-Tornero13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study evaluates the impact of decontamination methods on Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) between resin cement and resin blocks.

Methods: Twenty CAD/CAM resin blocks from two manufacturers were wet-polished, sandblasted, and ultrasonically cleaned. After blood and saliva contamination, blocks were divided into subgroups: control, water rinsing, acid etching, alkaline cleaning paste, or 10-MDP containing cleaner. Resin-based cement was then applied. After 24 hours, the blocks were sectioned to obtain bars for testing. Half of the specimens were tested immediately for μTBS, and the other half underwent artificial aging. The surfaces of the blocks were inspected with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Three-way ANOVA was performed for μTBS values (α=0.05).

Results: In one of the substrates, the positive control subgroup obtained the highest value (56,01 MPa, SD:6,96) followed by 10-MDP cleaner and universal cleaning paste, when immediately tested, with significant differences respect to the water rinsing (p⟨0.041) and acid etching (p⟨0.048) groups. After thermocycling, higher values were found in the 10-MDP cleaner (47,57 MPa, SD:8,15), but differences were not significant. In the other substrate group, the 10-MDP cleaner subgroup showed highest bond strengths (64,46 MPa SD: 10,92) at the initial test. After thermocycling, 10-MDP cleaner (58,66 MPa, SD: 9,93) gave the highest μTBS value. Significant differences between water rinsing group and the rest of subgroups (p⟨0.001), and between 10-MDP cleaner and the positive control group (p⟨0.006) were observed.

Conclusion: Cleaning after contamination improves bonding. 10-MDP containing cleaner can help to restore initial μTBS value and maintain it in the long-term.

不同去污方法对CAD/CAM树脂基砌块与树脂水泥微拉伸粘结强度的影响。
摘要:本研究评价了不同净化方法对树脂水泥与树脂块间微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS)的影响。方法:对两家厂家生产的20块CAD/CAM树脂块进行湿抛光、喷砂和超声清洗。血液和唾液污染后,将块分为对照组、水冲洗组、酸蚀刻组、碱性清洁膏组和含10-MDP清洁剂组。然后应用树脂基水泥。24小时后,对块体进行切片,获得棒材进行检测。其中一半立即进行μTBS检测,另一半进行人工老化。用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)对砌块表面进行了观察。对μTBS值进行三向方差分析(α=0.05)。结果:在其中一种底物中,阳性对照亚组获得的值最高(56,01 MPa, SD:6,96),其次是10-MDP清洁剂和通用清洁膏,立即测试时,水冲洗组(p⟨0.041)和酸蚀刻组(p⟨0.048)差异显著。经过热循环后,10-MDP清洗剂的值较高(47、57 MPa, SD:8、15),但差异不显著。在其他基材组中,10- mdp清洁亚组在初始测试时显示出最高的结合强度(64、46 MPa SD: 10、92)。热循环后,10-MDP清洗剂(58、66 MPa, SD: 9、93)的μTBS值最高。水冲洗组与其他亚组之间存在显著差异(p⟨0.001),10-MDP清洁剂与阳性对照组之间存在显著差异(p⟨0.006)。结论:污染后清洗可改善粘接。含有10-MDP的清洗剂有助于恢复初始μTBS值并长期维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信