A Swiss digital Delphi study on patient-reported outcomes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Matthew J Kerry, Thomas Volken, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Andrea Glässel, Markus Melloh
{"title":"A Swiss digital Delphi study on patient-reported outcomes.","authors":"Matthew J Kerry, Thomas Volken, Nikola Biller-Andorno, Andrea Glässel, Markus Melloh","doi":"10.57187/smw.2023.40125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims of the study: </strong>Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators are patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs are defined as any report of the status of a patient's health condition or health behaviour that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else. Despite Swiss national bodies (FOPH, FMH) recognising the potential of PRO measures (PROMs) for improving the health system, no consensus has yet emerged regarding a generic PROM framework or specific domains for practical uptake. The aim of the present digital Delphi study was to generate a consensual Swiss expert opinion on a generic PROM framework, measurement domains and items from a validated instrument (PROMIS [Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System]) as well as on the role and implementation of PROs in the Swiss healthcare system via PRO consensus statements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 4-round digital Delphi study was conducted among Swiss PRO stakeholders. A total of n = 21 Swiss PROM stakeholders completed round 1 surveys on the PROM framework. During the stakeholder meeting, n = 11 stakeholders completed round 2 and round 3 surveys pertaining to measurement domains and items, respectively. In-meeting key questions and discussion items were extracted, consolidated into statements and subjected to consensus voting in a round 4, post-meeting survey. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pre-meeting, agreement was reached for the tripartite framework of physical, mental and social health (95-100%). During the meeting, agreement was reached on all seven measurement domains of a generic PROM (PROMIS-29), ranging from 80% (Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance) to 100% (Pain Interference, Depression, Ability to Participate in Social Roles). Consensus was also reached for all PROMIS-29 items, with average domain consensus ranging from 83% (Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles) to 100% (Depression). Finally, four post-meeting consensus statements regarding PROs in Switzerland reached agreement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A Delphi method can help identify areas of need regarding PROMs in Switzerland. The current study identified a generic PROM as a missing quality indicator for the Swiss national health system's value. A pre-meeting informational briefing, expert presentations and moderation supported three voting rounds to help identify PROMIS-29 as a PROM framework (round 1), measurement domains (round 2) and items (round 3) as a basis for further validation research. The empirical agreement among diverse stakeholders supports broad consensus towards preliminary feasibility of integrating generic PROMs into the Swiss health system based on content relevance.</p>","PeriodicalId":22111,"journal":{"name":"Swiss medical weekly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss medical weekly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57187/smw.2023.40125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims of the study: Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) indicators are patient-reported outcomes (PROs). PROs are defined as any report of the status of a patient's health condition or health behaviour that comes directly from the patient, without interpretation of the patient's response by a clinician or anyone else. Despite Swiss national bodies (FOPH, FMH) recognising the potential of PRO measures (PROMs) for improving the health system, no consensus has yet emerged regarding a generic PROM framework or specific domains for practical uptake. The aim of the present digital Delphi study was to generate a consensual Swiss expert opinion on a generic PROM framework, measurement domains and items from a validated instrument (PROMIS [Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System]) as well as on the role and implementation of PROs in the Swiss healthcare system via PRO consensus statements.

Methods: A 4-round digital Delphi study was conducted among Swiss PRO stakeholders. A total of n = 21 Swiss PROM stakeholders completed round 1 surveys on the PROM framework. During the stakeholder meeting, n = 11 stakeholders completed round 2 and round 3 surveys pertaining to measurement domains and items, respectively. In-meeting key questions and discussion items were extracted, consolidated into statements and subjected to consensus voting in a round 4, post-meeting survey. Consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement.

Results: Pre-meeting, agreement was reached for the tripartite framework of physical, mental and social health (95-100%). During the meeting, agreement was reached on all seven measurement domains of a generic PROM (PROMIS-29), ranging from 80% (Anxiety, Sleep Disturbance) to 100% (Pain Interference, Depression, Ability to Participate in Social Roles). Consensus was also reached for all PROMIS-29 items, with average domain consensus ranging from 83% (Sleep Disturbance, Ability to Participate in Social Roles) to 100% (Depression). Finally, four post-meeting consensus statements regarding PROs in Switzerland reached agreement.

Conclusions: A Delphi method can help identify areas of need regarding PROMs in Switzerland. The current study identified a generic PROM as a missing quality indicator for the Swiss national health system's value. A pre-meeting informational briefing, expert presentations and moderation supported three voting rounds to help identify PROMIS-29 as a PROM framework (round 1), measurement domains (round 2) and items (round 3) as a basis for further validation research. The empirical agreement among diverse stakeholders supports broad consensus towards preliminary feasibility of integrating generic PROMs into the Swiss health system based on content relevance.

一项关于患者报告结果的瑞士数字德尔福研究。
研究目的:健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)指标是患者报告的结局(PROs)。病历的定义是直接由患者提供的关于患者健康状况或健康行为状况的任何报告,而无需临床医生或其他任何人对患者的反应进行解释。尽管瑞士国家机构(FOPH, FMH)认识到PRO措施(PROMs)改善卫生系统的潜力,但尚未就通用PROM框架或实际采用的特定领域达成共识。目前的数字德尔福研究的目的是就通用PROM框架、测量领域和经过验证的仪器(PROMIS[患者报告的结果测量信息系统])的项目,以及通过PRO共识声明,就PRO在瑞士医疗保健系统中的作用和实施,产生共识的瑞士专家意见。方法:对瑞士PRO利益相关者进行4轮数字德尔菲研究。共有n = 21名瑞士PROM利益相关者完成了关于PROM框架的第一轮调查。在涉众会议期间,n = 11个涉众分别完成了与度量领域和项目相关的第2轮和第3轮调查。会议上的关键问题和讨论项目被摘录并合并为发言,并在第4轮会议后调查中进行协商一致表决。共识定义为≥70%的同意。结果:会前,对身体、心理和社会健康三方框架达成一致(95% -100%)。会议期间,就通用PROM (promise -29)的所有七个测量领域达成了一致意见,范围从80%(焦虑、睡眠障碍)到100%(疼痛干扰、抑郁、参与社会角色的能力)。所有promise -29项目也达成了共识,平均共识范围从83%(睡眠障碍,参与社会角色的能力)到100%(抑郁)。最后,关于在瑞士的专业人员的四项会后协商一致声明达成了协议。结论:德尔菲法可以帮助确定瑞士prom的需求领域。目前的研究发现,通用PROM是瑞士国家卫生系统价值缺失的质量指标。会前的信息简报、专家介绍和审核支持了三轮投票,以帮助确定promise -29作为PROM框架(第一轮)、测量领域(第二轮)和项目(第三轮),作为进一步验证研究的基础。不同利益相关者之间的经验协议支持对基于内容相关性将通用prom整合到瑞士卫生系统的初步可行性达成广泛共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Swiss medical weekly
Swiss medical weekly 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Swiss Medical Weekly accepts for consideration original and review articles from all fields of medicine. The quality of SMW publications is guaranteed by a consistent policy of rigorous single-blind peer review. All editorial decisions are made by research-active academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信