[Does Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment lead to higher satisfaction? Results on satisfaction of persons involved in treatment within the Multi-center AKtiV Study].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatrische Praxis Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-21 DOI:10.1055/a-2179-6983
Gerhard Längle, Svenja Raschmann, Anna Heinsch, Tamara Großmann, Lasse Fischer, Jürgen Timm, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter, Stefan Weinmann, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Peter Brieger, Johannes Hamann, Tamara Waldmann, Julian Schwarz, Sandeep Rout, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Constance Hirschmeier, Johanna Baumgardt, Martin Holzke
{"title":"[Does Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment lead to higher satisfaction? Results on satisfaction of persons involved in treatment within the Multi-center AKtiV Study].","authors":"Gerhard Längle, Svenja Raschmann, Anna Heinsch, Tamara Großmann, Lasse Fischer, Jürgen Timm, Andreas Bechdolf, Sebastian von Peter, Stefan Weinmann, Konstantinos Nikolaidis, Peter Brieger, Johannes Hamann, Tamara Waldmann, Julian Schwarz, Sandeep Rout, Uwe Herwig, Janina Richter, Constance Hirschmeier, Johanna Baumgardt, Martin Holzke","doi":"10.1055/a-2179-6983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This part of the AKtiV Study focuses on treatment satisfaction of patients and their relatives within Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT) and regular treatment. Stress of relatives and job satisfaction and workload of employees in IEHT is also considered. Relevant Parameters were collected via established as well as newly adapted questionnaires at the end of treatment. Patients and relatives in IEHT are significantly more satisfied. The stress experienced by relatives is reduced in both forms of treatment. Employees in IEHT are generally very satisfied, although there is no correlation with the satisfaction of relatives and patients. Known limitations of satisfaction surveys must be taken into account. In general these results encourage the expansion and continuous development of this new form of treatment in Germany.</p>","PeriodicalId":20711,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrische Praxis","volume":" ","pages":"202-208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrische Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2179-6983","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This part of the AKtiV Study focuses on treatment satisfaction of patients and their relatives within Inpatient Equivalent Home Treatment (IEHT) and regular treatment. Stress of relatives and job satisfaction and workload of employees in IEHT is also considered. Relevant Parameters were collected via established as well as newly adapted questionnaires at the end of treatment. Patients and relatives in IEHT are significantly more satisfied. The stress experienced by relatives is reduced in both forms of treatment. Employees in IEHT are generally very satisfied, although there is no correlation with the satisfaction of relatives and patients. Known limitations of satisfaction surveys must be taken into account. In general these results encourage the expansion and continuous development of this new form of treatment in Germany.

住院等效家庭治疗是否会带来更高的满意度?多中心AKtiV研究中参与治疗的人员满意度的结果[j]。
AKtiV研究的这一部分侧重于患者及其亲属在住院等效家庭治疗(IEHT)和常规治疗中的治疗满意度。在IEHT中,还考虑了亲属压力、工作满意度和员工工作量。在治疗结束时,通过已建立的和新改编的问卷收集相关参数。患者及家属对IEHT的满意度显著提高。在这两种治疗形式中,亲属所经历的压力都减少了。虽然与家属和患者的满意度没有相关性,但参与IEHT的员工总体满意度非常高。必须考虑到满意度调查的已知局限性。总的来说,这些结果鼓励了这种新形式的治疗在德国的扩展和持续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrische Praxis
Psychiatrische Praxis PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Sozialpsychiatrisch orientiert Aktuelle Originalarbeiten und fundierte Übersichten Pro-Kontra-Debatten zu Brennpunktthemen Informative Fallbeispiele Vorstellung internationaler Studien
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信