EXtraction or PREServation? EXPRESS survey of patients' preference for toothache in public health facilities of Eastern India.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
S P Narayanan, S Mahapatra, H Rath, N N Nagarajan, M Mahakur
{"title":"EXtraction or PREServation? EXPRESS survey of patients' preference for toothache in public health facilities of Eastern India.","authors":"S P Narayanan, S Mahapatra, H Rath, N N Nagarajan, M Mahakur","doi":"10.1922/CDH_00085Narayanan07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate patients' preference for extraction or preservation for toothache and hypothetical anterior tooth pain along with the specific reason for their choice.</p><p><strong>Basic research design: </strong>Cross-sectional analytical semi-structured interview study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A sample of 703 adult dental outpatients visiting secondary and tertiary government health centres with toothache due to dental caries in Eastern India.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Patients preferring restorative or extraction services for toothache, specific reason, and socio-demographic background factors for anterior and posterior teeth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Half (50.1%) choose preservation for present toothache and 79.9% for hypothetical front tooth pain. Immediate relief from toothache for extraction and the motive to preserve natural teeth for preservation were the main reasons expressed. In logistic regression, participants preferring extraction were more likely to be aged 25-34 years (OR = 1.94), 55+ years (OR=33.32), have primary and below education level (OR=1.99), have had a previous extraction (OR=1.99) and be unaware of preservation options (OR=2.34). For assumed anterior tooth pain, those between 25-34 years (OR=0.39) were more likely to choose preservation. Participants with primary and below education levels (OR=1.99) and unaware of preservation options (OR=1.95) chose extraction of the front tooth irrespective of their choice of treatment for the present toothache.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Notable differences between the choices to preserve or extract a posterior tooth were not found. There was greater preference towards preserving anterior teeth. Future research should identify additional barriers to the preference and utilization of restorative services.</p>","PeriodicalId":10647,"journal":{"name":"Community dental health","volume":" ","pages":"20-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dental health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_00085Narayanan07","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate patients' preference for extraction or preservation for toothache and hypothetical anterior tooth pain along with the specific reason for their choice.

Basic research design: Cross-sectional analytical semi-structured interview study.

Participants: A sample of 703 adult dental outpatients visiting secondary and tertiary government health centres with toothache due to dental caries in Eastern India.

Main outcome measures: Patients preferring restorative or extraction services for toothache, specific reason, and socio-demographic background factors for anterior and posterior teeth.

Results: Half (50.1%) choose preservation for present toothache and 79.9% for hypothetical front tooth pain. Immediate relief from toothache for extraction and the motive to preserve natural teeth for preservation were the main reasons expressed. In logistic regression, participants preferring extraction were more likely to be aged 25-34 years (OR = 1.94), 55+ years (OR=33.32), have primary and below education level (OR=1.99), have had a previous extraction (OR=1.99) and be unaware of preservation options (OR=2.34). For assumed anterior tooth pain, those between 25-34 years (OR=0.39) were more likely to choose preservation. Participants with primary and below education levels (OR=1.99) and unaware of preservation options (OR=1.95) chose extraction of the front tooth irrespective of their choice of treatment for the present toothache.

Conclusion: Notable differences between the choices to preserve or extract a posterior tooth were not found. There was greater preference towards preserving anterior teeth. Future research should identify additional barriers to the preference and utilization of restorative services.

提取还是保存?EXPRESS调查了东印度公共卫生机构患者对牙痛的偏好。
目的:探讨牙痛和假性前牙疼痛患者对拔除或保留牙体的选择及具体原因。基础研究设计:横断面分析半结构化访谈研究。参与者:在印度东部,703名因龋齿而牙痛的成人牙科门诊患者前往二级和三级政府保健中心就诊。主要结果测量:患者因牙痛倾向于修复或拔牙服务,具体原因,前牙和后牙的社会人口背景因素。结果:半数(50.1%)的患者因现时牙痛选择保存,79.9%的患者因假性前牙疼痛选择保存。拔牙的主要原因是为了立即缓解牙痛和保存天然牙齿。在logistic回归中,倾向于拔牙的参与者更有可能是25-34岁(OR= 1.94), 55岁以上(OR=33.32),小学及以下教育水平(OR=1.99),之前有过拔牙(OR=1.99),不知道保存选项(OR=2.34)。对于假定的前牙疼痛,25-34岁(OR=0.39)的患者更有可能选择保留。小学及以下教育水平的参与者(OR=1.99)和不知道保存方法的参与者(OR=1.95)选择拔除门牙,而不考虑他们目前牙痛的治疗选择。结论:保留后牙与拔除后牙的选择差异无统计学意义。更倾向于保留前牙。未来的研究应确定对偏好和利用恢复性服务的其他障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dental health
Community dental health 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal is concerned with dental public health and related subjects. Dental public health is the science and the art of preventing oral disease, promoting oral health, and improving the quality of life through the organised efforts of society. The discipline covers a wide range and includes such topics as: -oral epidemiology- oral health services research- preventive dentistry - especially in relation to communities- oral health education and promotion- clinical research - with particular emphasis on the care of special groups- behavioural sciences related to dentistry- decision theory- quality of life- risk analysis- ethics and oral health economics- quality assessment. The journal publishes scientific articles on the relevant fields, review articles, discussion papers, news items, and editorials. It is of interest to dentists working in dental public health and to other professionals concerned with disease prevention, health service planning, and health promotion throughout the world. In the case of epidemiology of oral diseases the Journal prioritises national studies unless local studies have major methodological innovations or information of particular interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信