Etiology and treatment of panic disorders.

Progress in behavior modification Pub Date : 1989-01-01
G A Clum, J W Borden
{"title":"Etiology and treatment of panic disorders.","authors":"G A Clum,&nbsp;J W Borden","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>At this point in time, what do we know concerning the etiology and treatment of panic disorders? First, it appears that panic disorder is reached through multiple paths. Genetic vulnerability manifested through biological vulnerability appears to be a factor in at least some instances of this disorder. Environmental factors, such as interpersonal and other forms of stress, as well as various cognitive processing errors, also likely play a part in the development of panic. Whether these factors are additive or not or whether they combine in some other way to increase the probability that panic will develop is simply unknown at this time. A number of behavioral treatment techniques have developed within the past ten years as ways of ameliorating panic disorder. These techniques have been tied conceptually to etiological models of panic. In addition to exposure techniques, various physiologically based approaches (e.g., breathing retraining) and cognitively based approaches have been studied. These approaches target not only the avoidance behavior of agoraphobia, but also the panic attacks themselves. It appears safe to say that these techniques currently provide a viable alternative to pharmacological agents. Nonetheless, controlled studies that directly assess the relative merits of behavioral and pharmacological techniques are vitally needed. The present review uncovered a number of research questions and methodological issues. Unresolved etiological issues requiring clarification in the near future include the following: (1) Are stressful events important in the development of panic, or are they more incidentally related? Important in answering this question will be studies comparing panic disordered individuals with others suffering from such disorders as dysthymic reaction as well as other anxiety disorders. Also important will be longitudinal studies of individuals found to be suffering from panic disorder in order to determine whether exacerbations are stress related. (2) Are catastrophic thinking and other cognitive errors primary or secondary to panic disorder? That is, are such cognitive problems stable characteristics of panic disordered persons, or do they develop secondarily to panic disorders? (3) What determines whether an individual who develops panic disorder will also develop avoidance behavior? Along these same lines, will treatment approaches that successfully reduce panic have the secondary effect of reducing the prevalence of agoraphobia? (4) Are the behavioral techniques currently being developed to treat panic disorders viable with more severe types of agoraphobia, and will they add significantly to improvement rates when paired with exposure techniques?</p>","PeriodicalId":77598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in behavior modification","volume":"24 ","pages":"192-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in behavior modification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

At this point in time, what do we know concerning the etiology and treatment of panic disorders? First, it appears that panic disorder is reached through multiple paths. Genetic vulnerability manifested through biological vulnerability appears to be a factor in at least some instances of this disorder. Environmental factors, such as interpersonal and other forms of stress, as well as various cognitive processing errors, also likely play a part in the development of panic. Whether these factors are additive or not or whether they combine in some other way to increase the probability that panic will develop is simply unknown at this time. A number of behavioral treatment techniques have developed within the past ten years as ways of ameliorating panic disorder. These techniques have been tied conceptually to etiological models of panic. In addition to exposure techniques, various physiologically based approaches (e.g., breathing retraining) and cognitively based approaches have been studied. These approaches target not only the avoidance behavior of agoraphobia, but also the panic attacks themselves. It appears safe to say that these techniques currently provide a viable alternative to pharmacological agents. Nonetheless, controlled studies that directly assess the relative merits of behavioral and pharmacological techniques are vitally needed. The present review uncovered a number of research questions and methodological issues. Unresolved etiological issues requiring clarification in the near future include the following: (1) Are stressful events important in the development of panic, or are they more incidentally related? Important in answering this question will be studies comparing panic disordered individuals with others suffering from such disorders as dysthymic reaction as well as other anxiety disorders. Also important will be longitudinal studies of individuals found to be suffering from panic disorder in order to determine whether exacerbations are stress related. (2) Are catastrophic thinking and other cognitive errors primary or secondary to panic disorder? That is, are such cognitive problems stable characteristics of panic disordered persons, or do they develop secondarily to panic disorders? (3) What determines whether an individual who develops panic disorder will also develop avoidance behavior? Along these same lines, will treatment approaches that successfully reduce panic have the secondary effect of reducing the prevalence of agoraphobia? (4) Are the behavioral techniques currently being developed to treat panic disorders viable with more severe types of agoraphobia, and will they add significantly to improvement rates when paired with exposure techniques?

惊恐障碍的病因和治疗。
目前,我们对恐慌症的病因和治疗了解多少?首先,恐慌症似乎是通过多种途径达到的。通过生物脆弱性表现出来的遗传脆弱性似乎至少在某些情况下是这种疾病的一个因素。环境因素,如人际关系和其他形式的压力,以及各种认知处理错误,也可能在恐慌的发展中发挥作用。这些因素是否加在一起,或者它们是否以其他方式联合起来增加恐慌发生的可能性,目前还不得而知。在过去的十年里,许多行为治疗技术已经发展成为改善恐慌症的方法。这些技术在概念上与恐慌的病因学模型联系在一起。除了暴露技术外,还研究了各种基于生理学的方法(如呼吸再训练)和基于认知的方法。这些方法不仅针对广场恐怖症的回避行为,而且针对恐慌发作本身。似乎可以肯定地说,这些技术目前提供了一种可行的替代药物。然而,直接评估行为和药理学技术的相对优点的对照研究是非常必要的。本综述揭示了一些研究问题和方法问题。在不久的将来需要澄清的未解决的病因问题包括:(1)压力事件在恐慌的发展中是重要的,还是它们只是偶然相关?要回答这个问题,重要的是将恐慌症患者与其他患有心境恶劣反应和其他焦虑症的患者进行比较研究。同样重要的是,对患有恐慌症的个体进行纵向研究,以确定病情恶化是否与压力有关。(2)灾难性思维和其他认知错误是惊恐障碍的主因还是继发?也就是说,这些认知问题是恐慌症患者的稳定特征,还是它们是继发于恐慌症的?(3)是什么决定了惊恐障碍的个体是否也会发展出回避行为?沿着同样的思路,成功减少恐慌的治疗方法是否具有减少广场恐惧症患病率的次要效果?(4)目前正在开发的用于治疗惊恐障碍的行为技术是否适用于更严重类型的广场恐怖症?当与暴露技术相结合时,它们是否会显著提高治愈率?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信