Infusion of etoposide and vincristine in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

D V Jackson, B L Powell, J M Cruz, C L Spurr, H B Muss
{"title":"Infusion of etoposide and vincristine in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.","authors":"D V Jackson,&nbsp;B L Powell,&nbsp;J M Cruz,&nbsp;C L Spurr,&nbsp;H B Muss","doi":"10.1089/sct.1989.5.129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infusion of etoposide has previously been evaluated in phase I trials. Vincristine (VCR) given by infusion has been shown in a phase II trial to be active in some cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma despite prior exposure to bolus VCR. Infusion of etoposide and the combination of VCR infusion with etoposide (given either as an infusion or bolus) were evaluated in 24 patients with previously treated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Five-day infusions of etoposide alone (n = 10), both etoposide and VCR (n = 9), or VCR with bolus etoposide (n = 5) were evaluated. Partial responses were observed in 0, 2 (22%), and 1 (20%) of the patients, respectively. Myelosuppression was the principal toxicity with the 5-day infusions of etoposide alone and with the double infusion combination, but was mild in the VCR infusion coupled with etoposide bolus. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild to moderate in each. For patients with refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, the infusion of etoposide with or without VCR infusion appeared to offer no advantage over bolus administration of etoposide or infusion of VCR alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":21792,"journal":{"name":"Selective cancer therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/sct.1989.5.129","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Selective cancer therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/sct.1989.5.129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Infusion of etoposide has previously been evaluated in phase I trials. Vincristine (VCR) given by infusion has been shown in a phase II trial to be active in some cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma despite prior exposure to bolus VCR. Infusion of etoposide and the combination of VCR infusion with etoposide (given either as an infusion or bolus) were evaluated in 24 patients with previously treated non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Five-day infusions of etoposide alone (n = 10), both etoposide and VCR (n = 9), or VCR with bolus etoposide (n = 5) were evaluated. Partial responses were observed in 0, 2 (22%), and 1 (20%) of the patients, respectively. Myelosuppression was the principal toxicity with the 5-day infusions of etoposide alone and with the double infusion combination, but was mild in the VCR infusion coupled with etoposide bolus. Non-hematologic toxicity was mild to moderate in each. For patients with refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, the infusion of etoposide with or without VCR infusion appeared to offer no advantage over bolus administration of etoposide or infusion of VCR alone.

依托泊苷和长春新碱输注治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤。
依托泊苷的输注已经在I期试验中进行了评估。在一项II期试验中,输注长春新碱(VCR)在一些非霍奇金淋巴瘤病例中显示出活性,尽管先前暴露于大剂量VCR。在24例既往治疗过的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者中,对依托泊苷输注和VCR输注与依托泊苷联合(输注或单丸)进行了评估。观察单独滴注依托泊苷(n = 10)、依托泊苷加VCR (n = 9)、VCR加依托泊苷(n = 5) 5天的疗效。分别有0例、2例(22%)和1例(20%)患者出现部分缓解。单独输注5天和双输注联合输注时,骨髓抑制是主要毒性,而VCR输注联合依托泊苷丸的毒性较轻。非血液学毒性均为轻至中度。对于难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,与VCR输注或不输注依托泊苷相比,单独输注依托泊苷或单独输注VCR似乎没有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信