Polarization, the Pandemic, and Public Trust in Health System Actors.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Alessandro Del Ponte, Alan S Gerber, Eric M Patashnik
{"title":"Polarization, the Pandemic, and Public Trust in Health System Actors.","authors":"Alessandro Del Ponte, Alan S Gerber, Eric M Patashnik","doi":"10.1215/03616878-11075562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Public opinion on the performance of health system actors is polarized today, but it remains unclear which actors enjoy the most or the least trust among Democrats and Republicans, whether the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced how people view their own physicians, and whether doctors have retained the ability to influence public beliefs about policy issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted two national surveys in 2022 and 2023 to examine these questions.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Democrats rated the performance of medical research scientists and public health experts during the pandemic more highly than did Republicans and independents. About three in ten Republicans said the pandemic decreased their trust in their personal doctors. Nonetheless, most Americans reported confidence in physicians. The authors replicated the findings of Gerber and colleagues (2014) to demonstrate that respondents continued to have more positive views of doctors than other professionals and that public opinion was responsive to cues from a doctors' group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>What polarizes Democrats and Republicans today is not the question of whether medical scientists and public health experts are competent but whether the advice offered by these actors is in the public interest and should guide policy makers' decisions. Democrats strongly believe the answer to these questions is yes, while Republicans exhibit skepticism.</p>","PeriodicalId":54812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","volume":" ","pages":"375-401"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11075562","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Public opinion on the performance of health system actors is polarized today, but it remains unclear which actors enjoy the most or the least trust among Democrats and Republicans, whether the COVID-19 pandemic has influenced how people view their own physicians, and whether doctors have retained the ability to influence public beliefs about policy issues.

Methods: The authors conducted two national surveys in 2022 and 2023 to examine these questions.

Findings: Democrats rated the performance of medical research scientists and public health experts during the pandemic more highly than did Republicans and independents. About three in ten Republicans said the pandemic decreased their trust in their personal doctors. Nonetheless, most Americans reported confidence in physicians. The authors replicated the findings of Gerber and colleagues (2014) to demonstrate that respondents continued to have more positive views of doctors than other professionals and that public opinion was responsive to cues from a doctors' group.

Conclusions: What polarizes Democrats and Republicans today is not the question of whether medical scientists and public health experts are competent but whether the advice offered by these actors is in the public interest and should guide policy makers' decisions. Democrats strongly believe the answer to these questions is yes, while Republicans exhibit skepticism.

两极分化、大流行和公众对卫生系统行为者的信任。
背景:如今,公众对卫生系统行为者表现的看法两极分化,但目前尚不清楚民主党人和共和党人对哪些行为者的信任最多(最少),Covid-19大流行是否影响了人们对自己医生的看法,以及医生是否保留了影响公众对政策问题看法的能力。方法:我们在2022年和2023年进行了两次全国调查,对这些问题进行了检验。调查结果:民主党人对医学研究科学家和公共卫生专家在疫情期间的表现的评价高于共和党人和无党派人士。大约十分之三的共和党人表示,疫情降低了他们对私人医生的信任。尽管如此,大多数美国人表示对医生有信心。我们复制了Gerber等人(2014)的研究结果,以证明受访者对医生的看法比其他专业人士更积极,公众舆论对医生群体的暗示做出了反应。结论:今天使民主党和共和党分化的不是医学科学家和公共卫生专家是否有能力,而是这些行为者提供的建议是否符合公众利益,是否应该指导决策者的决定。民主党人坚信这些问题的答案是肯定的,而共和党人则持怀疑态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A leading journal in its field, and the primary source of communication across the many disciplines it serves, the Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law focuses on the initiation, formulation, and implementation of health policy and analyzes the relations between government and health—past, present, and future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信