Sara Farghaly, Tracy Sparkes, Brian Masters, Abdolreza Haririan, Neha Jakhete, Daniel Maluf, Rolf N Barth, Sari Freedman
{"title":"Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy on Rejection among Liver Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Sara Farghaly, Tracy Sparkes, Brian Masters, Abdolreza Haririan, Neha Jakhete, Daniel Maluf, Rolf N Barth, Sari Freedman","doi":"10.1177/15269248231212915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, with an even higher risk among patients requiring renal replacement therapy. There is limited data evaluating rejection outcomes in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after liver transplant. <b>Program evaluation aims:</b> To evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, recipient and graft survival, infection, renal dysfunction, and immunosuppression practices. <b>Design:</b> This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. To be eligible, patients were deceased donor liver transplant recipients ≥18 year of age transplanted between January 2017 and August 2019 who received steroid-only induction and tacrolimus as part of their initial immunosuppression regimen. <b>Results:</b> Recipients that required renal replacement therapy (N = 86) were compared to those who received no renal replacement therapy (N = 158). Biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1-year posttransplant was significantly higher among those requiring renal replacement therapy (36% vs 13%, <i>P</i> < .001). Patient survival at 12 months was 77% for those requiring renal replacement therapy and 94% for those not requiring renal replacement therapy (<i>P</i> < .001). Infection (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-8.8; <i>P</i> < .001), but not rejection (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.7; <i>P</i> = .5) was an independent predictor of mortality. The use of renal replacement therapy after liver transplant necessitated careful titration of immunosuppression to balance the detrimental risks of infection versus rejection in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248231212915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, with an even higher risk among patients requiring renal replacement therapy. There is limited data evaluating rejection outcomes in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after liver transplant. Program evaluation aims: To evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, recipient and graft survival, infection, renal dysfunction, and immunosuppression practices. Design: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. To be eligible, patients were deceased donor liver transplant recipients ≥18 year of age transplanted between January 2017 and August 2019 who received steroid-only induction and tacrolimus as part of their initial immunosuppression regimen. Results: Recipients that required renal replacement therapy (N = 86) were compared to those who received no renal replacement therapy (N = 158). Biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1-year posttransplant was significantly higher among those requiring renal replacement therapy (36% vs 13%, P < .001). Patient survival at 12 months was 77% for those requiring renal replacement therapy and 94% for those not requiring renal replacement therapy (P < .001). Infection (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-8.8; P < .001), but not rejection (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.7; P = .5) was an independent predictor of mortality. The use of renal replacement therapy after liver transplant necessitated careful titration of immunosuppression to balance the detrimental risks of infection versus rejection in this high-risk population.
肝移植受者肾功能不全与发病率和死亡率增加相关,在需要肾脏替代治疗的患者中风险更高。评估肝移植后需要肾脏替代治疗的患者排斥反应的数据有限。项目评估目的:评估活检证实的急性排斥反应、受体和移植物存活、感染、肾功能障碍和免疫抑制的发生率。设计:这是一项单中心、回顾性、队列研究。符合条件的患者是2017年1月至2019年8月期间移植的年龄≥18岁的已故供体肝移植受者,他们接受了仅类固醇诱导和他克莫司作为初始免疫抑制方案的一部分。结果:需要肾脏替代治疗的受者(N = 86)与未接受肾脏替代治疗的受者(N = 158)进行了比较。移植后1年活检证实的急性排斥反应在需要肾脏替代治疗的患者中明显更高(36% vs 13%, P P P P = 0.5),是死亡率的独立预测因子。在肝移植后使用肾脏替代疗法需要仔细滴定免疫抑制,以平衡高危人群感染和排斥反应的有害风险。