Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy on Rejection among Liver Transplant Recipients.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Progress in Transplantation Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-19 DOI:10.1177/15269248231212915
Sara Farghaly, Tracy Sparkes, Brian Masters, Abdolreza Haririan, Neha Jakhete, Daniel Maluf, Rolf N Barth, Sari Freedman
{"title":"Impact of Renal Replacement Therapy on Rejection among Liver Transplant Recipients.","authors":"Sara Farghaly, Tracy Sparkes, Brian Masters, Abdolreza Haririan, Neha Jakhete, Daniel Maluf, Rolf N Barth, Sari Freedman","doi":"10.1177/15269248231212915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, with an even higher risk among patients requiring renal replacement therapy. There is limited data evaluating rejection outcomes in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after liver transplant. <b>Program evaluation aims:</b> To evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, recipient and graft survival, infection, renal dysfunction, and immunosuppression practices. <b>Design:</b> This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. To be eligible, patients were deceased donor liver transplant recipients ≥18 year of age transplanted between January 2017 and August 2019 who received steroid-only induction and tacrolimus as part of their initial immunosuppression regimen. <b>Results:</b> Recipients that required renal replacement therapy (N  =  86) were compared to those who received no renal replacement therapy (N  =  158). Biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1-year posttransplant was significantly higher among those requiring renal replacement therapy (36% vs 13%, <i>P</i> < .001). Patient survival at 12 months was 77% for those requiring renal replacement therapy and 94% for those not requiring renal replacement therapy (<i>P</i> < .001). Infection (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-8.8; <i>P</i> < .001), but not rejection (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.7; <i>P</i>  =  .5) was an independent predictor of mortality. The use of renal replacement therapy after liver transplant necessitated careful titration of immunosuppression to balance the detrimental risks of infection versus rejection in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":20671,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15269248231212915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Renal dysfunction in liver transplant recipients is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality, with an even higher risk among patients requiring renal replacement therapy. There is limited data evaluating rejection outcomes in patients requiring renal replacement therapy after liver transplant. Program evaluation aims: To evaluate the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection, recipient and graft survival, infection, renal dysfunction, and immunosuppression practices. Design: This was a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. To be eligible, patients were deceased donor liver transplant recipients ≥18 year of age transplanted between January 2017 and August 2019 who received steroid-only induction and tacrolimus as part of their initial immunosuppression regimen. Results: Recipients that required renal replacement therapy (N  =  86) were compared to those who received no renal replacement therapy (N  =  158). Biopsy-proven acute rejection at 1-year posttransplant was significantly higher among those requiring renal replacement therapy (36% vs 13%, P < .001). Patient survival at 12 months was 77% for those requiring renal replacement therapy and 94% for those not requiring renal replacement therapy (P < .001). Infection (HR 3.8, 95% CI 1.6-8.8; P < .001), but not rejection (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.3-1.7; P  =  .5) was an independent predictor of mortality. The use of renal replacement therapy after liver transplant necessitated careful titration of immunosuppression to balance the detrimental risks of infection versus rejection in this high-risk population.

肾替代治疗对肝移植受者排斥反应的影响。
肝移植受者肾功能不全与发病率和死亡率增加相关,在需要肾脏替代治疗的患者中风险更高。评估肝移植后需要肾脏替代治疗的患者排斥反应的数据有限。项目评估目的:评估活检证实的急性排斥反应、受体和移植物存活、感染、肾功能障碍和免疫抑制的发生率。设计:这是一项单中心、回顾性、队列研究。符合条件的患者是2017年1月至2019年8月期间移植的年龄≥18岁的已故供体肝移植受者,他们接受了仅类固醇诱导和他克莫司作为初始免疫抑制方案的一部分。结果:需要肾脏替代治疗的受者(N = 86)与未接受肾脏替代治疗的受者(N = 158)进行了比较。移植后1年活检证实的急性排斥反应在需要肾脏替代治疗的患者中明显更高(36% vs 13%, P P P P = 0.5),是死亡率的独立预测因子。在肝移植后使用肾脏替代疗法需要仔细滴定免疫抑制,以平衡高危人群感染和排斥反应的有害风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Transplantation
Progress in Transplantation SURGERY-TRANSPLANTATION
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Transplantation (PIT) is the official journal of NATCO, The Organization for Transplant Professionals. Journal Partners include: Australasian Transplant Coordinators Association and Society for Transplant Social Workers. PIT reflects the multi-disciplinary team approach to procurement and clinical aspects of organ and tissue transplantation by providing a professional forum for exchange of the continually changing body of knowledge in transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信