Rethinking the Rise of China: A Postcolonial Critique of China and a Chinese Critique of the Postcolonial

0 ANTHROPOLOGY
Sociology Lens Pub Date : 2022-03-18 DOI:10.1111/johs.12361
Jinba Tenzin
{"title":"Rethinking the Rise of China: A Postcolonial Critique of China and a Chinese Critique of the Postcolonial","authors":"Jinba Tenzin","doi":"10.1111/johs.12361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article is intended to rethink a symbiotic but otherwise inadequately attended relationship between postcolonial studies and Chinese academia at a time when the rise of China evokes epistemic, ontological and empirical challenges for critical reflection. Above all, I argue that China is situated in her postcolonial conditions in such a way that these conditions largely define China's multi-faceted positioning as colonial agent, (semi-)colonial victim, recipient of colonialist ideology, overthrower of that ideology and its accompanying world-system, and contender for the “top place” within such a world-system. Postcolonial theory hence becomes relevant and productive in terms of its potential to problematize various puzzles, contradictions and tensions during China's rise like widespread disregard of basic civic values, political partisanship in scholarship, aggravation of the East-West divide and rising Chinese exceptionalism. Additionally, however, this article also pinpoints the need to transform and reshape the oftentimes Eurocentric inclination in postcolonial studies through an incorporation of the revolutionary and post-revolutionary experiences in China and elsewhere. Doing so therefore calls for a post-revolutionary paradigm as proposed by Wang Hui, among others. I thus advocate cross-fertilization, rather than mutual exclusion, not only between the postcolonial and post-revolutionary paradigms but also between postcolonial studies and Chinese scholarship/academia.</p>","PeriodicalId":101168,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Lens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/johs.12361","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Lens","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/johs.12361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is intended to rethink a symbiotic but otherwise inadequately attended relationship between postcolonial studies and Chinese academia at a time when the rise of China evokes epistemic, ontological and empirical challenges for critical reflection. Above all, I argue that China is situated in her postcolonial conditions in such a way that these conditions largely define China's multi-faceted positioning as colonial agent, (semi-)colonial victim, recipient of colonialist ideology, overthrower of that ideology and its accompanying world-system, and contender for the “top place” within such a world-system. Postcolonial theory hence becomes relevant and productive in terms of its potential to problematize various puzzles, contradictions and tensions during China's rise like widespread disregard of basic civic values, political partisanship in scholarship, aggravation of the East-West divide and rising Chinese exceptionalism. Additionally, however, this article also pinpoints the need to transform and reshape the oftentimes Eurocentric inclination in postcolonial studies through an incorporation of the revolutionary and post-revolutionary experiences in China and elsewhere. Doing so therefore calls for a post-revolutionary paradigm as proposed by Wang Hui, among others. I thus advocate cross-fertilization, rather than mutual exclusion, not only between the postcolonial and post-revolutionary paradigms but also between postcolonial studies and Chinese scholarship/academia.

重新思考中国的崛起:中国的后殖民批判与中国的后殖民批判
本文旨在重新思考后殖民研究与中国学术界之间的共生关系,但在此之前,中国的崛起引发了对批判性反思的认识论、本体论和经验主义挑战。最重要的是,我认为中国处于后殖民状态,这些状态在很大程度上决定了中国的多重定位:殖民代理人、(半)殖民受害者、殖民意识形态的接受者、殖民意识形态及其伴随的世界体系的推翻者,以及在这种世界体系中争夺“最高地位”的竞争者。因此,后殖民理论在解决中国崛起过程中出现的各种难题、矛盾和紧张局势方面变得相关且富有成效,比如对基本公民价值观的普遍漠视、学术上的政治党派之争、东西方分歧的加剧以及中国例外论的兴起。此外,本文还指出,需要通过结合中国和其他地方的革命和后革命经验,转变和重塑后殖民研究中经常出现的欧洲中心主义倾向。因此,这样做需要王辉等人提出的后革命范式。因此,我主张不仅在后殖民和后革命范式之间,而且在后殖民研究和中国学术之间,相互促进,而不是相互排斥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信