Does beautiful nature motivate to work? Outlining an alternative pathway to nature-induced cognitive performance benefits

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yannick Joye , Florian Lange , Maja Fischer
{"title":"Does beautiful nature motivate to work? Outlining an alternative pathway to nature-induced cognitive performance benefits","authors":"Yannick Joye ,&nbsp;Florian Lange ,&nbsp;Maja Fischer","doi":"10.1016/j.newideapsych.2022.100946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Ample research shows that spending time in natural (vs. urban) environments, or merely watching nature scenes, can seemingly replenish depleted cognitive resources and thereby improve cognitive functioning. While such findings are traditionally explained by referring to Attention Restoration Theory (ART), in the present research, we outline and test a potential alternative explanation for nature-related performance benefits. Our account centers on the notion that the aesthetically pleasing character of nature scenes simply fosters individuals' willingness to work, including working on the cognitive tasks used in attention restoration research. After outlining our theoretical proposal, we report the results of a preregistered showcase study in which we asked participants (</span><em>N</em> = 219) to watch a slideshow of fifteen photos of natural scenes/elements. The beauty of the slideshow images was manipulated by presenting either aesthetically attractive nature images (beautiful nature condition) or nature images where the aesthetic qualities had been removed through pixilation (pixelated nature condition). We subsequently tested the effect of this manipulation on participants' performance on a simple and mindless “clicking task”, consisting of freely clicking radio buttons. We also varied the number of clicking tasks participants had to perform (between-subjects); while all participants had to click buttons after the nature slideshow, a subset of them also had to do the clicking task <em>before</em> watching the slideshow images. Results show that participants who only had to do the clicking task once (i.e., after the slideshow) and who had watched beautiful nature, clicked more buttons, and reported to feel more motivated to click buttons compared to participants who had watched relatively unappealing pixelated nature images. This general nature-related performance enhancement could account for the general pattern of positive nature effects on cognitive tasks without requiring ART's additional assumptions of resource replenishment and resource specificity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0732118X22000162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ample research shows that spending time in natural (vs. urban) environments, or merely watching nature scenes, can seemingly replenish depleted cognitive resources and thereby improve cognitive functioning. While such findings are traditionally explained by referring to Attention Restoration Theory (ART), in the present research, we outline and test a potential alternative explanation for nature-related performance benefits. Our account centers on the notion that the aesthetically pleasing character of nature scenes simply fosters individuals' willingness to work, including working on the cognitive tasks used in attention restoration research. After outlining our theoretical proposal, we report the results of a preregistered showcase study in which we asked participants (N = 219) to watch a slideshow of fifteen photos of natural scenes/elements. The beauty of the slideshow images was manipulated by presenting either aesthetically attractive nature images (beautiful nature condition) or nature images where the aesthetic qualities had been removed through pixilation (pixelated nature condition). We subsequently tested the effect of this manipulation on participants' performance on a simple and mindless “clicking task”, consisting of freely clicking radio buttons. We also varied the number of clicking tasks participants had to perform (between-subjects); while all participants had to click buttons after the nature slideshow, a subset of them also had to do the clicking task before watching the slideshow images. Results show that participants who only had to do the clicking task once (i.e., after the slideshow) and who had watched beautiful nature, clicked more buttons, and reported to feel more motivated to click buttons compared to participants who had watched relatively unappealing pixelated nature images. This general nature-related performance enhancement could account for the general pattern of positive nature effects on cognitive tasks without requiring ART's additional assumptions of resource replenishment and resource specificity.

美丽的自然能激励人们工作吗?概述了自然诱导的认知表现益处的另一种途径
大量的研究表明,花时间在自然环境(相对于城市)中,或者仅仅是观看自然场景,似乎可以补充耗尽的认知资源,从而改善认知功能。虽然这些发现传统上是通过参考注意力恢复理论(ART)来解释的,但在本研究中,我们概述并测试了与自然相关的表现益处的潜在替代解释。我们的描述集中在这样一个概念上,即自然场景的美学愉悦性只会促进个人的工作意愿,包括在注意力恢复研究中使用的认知任务上的工作。在概述了我们的理论建议之后,我们报告了一项预注册展示研究的结果,在该研究中,我们要求参与者(N = 219)观看15张自然场景/元素照片的幻灯片。通过呈现具有美学吸引力的自然图像(美丽的自然条件)或通过像素化(像素化的自然条件)去除美学品质的自然图像来操纵幻灯片图像的美感。随后,我们测试了这种操作对参与者在一个简单且无需动脑的“点击任务”中的表现的影响,这个任务包括自由点击单选按钮。我们还改变了参与者必须执行的点击任务的数量(在受试者之间);虽然所有参与者都必须在自然幻灯片放映后点击按钮,但他们中的一部分人也必须在观看幻灯片图像之前完成点击任务。结果显示,那些只需要做一次点击任务的参与者(即在幻灯片之后),那些观看了美丽自然的参与者,点击了更多的按钮,并且与那些观看相对不吸引人的像素化自然图像的参与者相比,他们更有动力点击按钮。这种与自然相关的一般性能增强可以解释认知任务中积极自然效应的一般模式,而不需要ART对资源补充和资源特异性的额外假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信