Angela Kimweri , Sabrina Hermosilla , Elysia Larson , Godfrey Mbaruku , Margaret E. Kruk
{"title":"Service quality influences delivery decisions: A qualitative study on maternity care in rural Tanzania","authors":"Angela Kimweri , Sabrina Hermosilla , Elysia Larson , Godfrey Mbaruku , Margaret E. Kruk","doi":"10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The relationship between utilization of quality health services and positive health outcomes is well documented, however in low resource settings there is both a shortage of quality services and low utilization of existing services. We assessed women and men's understanding of quality in health facilities and their application of this understanding in selecting place of delivery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Ten focus group discussions (FGD) were held between May and December 2011 (five with women and five with men). The groups had 6–11 respondents. FGDs were conducted, recorded, and transcribed in Swahili then translated into English. Transcripts were analyzed using NVivo 9 software. Conceptual framework confirmatory analysis was conducted to compare results from FGDs with pre-existing frameworks for understanding health center quality in low resource settings.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>High education and positive attitude of delivery staff, close proximity to the health facility, availability of providers, and modern equipment were cited as reasons for facility delivery. Expectations of complications and better care led to seeking care at higher-level institutions. The one aspect of quality that men focused on more than women was disrespectful care and health worker attitude. The choice to deliver in a hospital versus a primary care clinic or at home was not always the woman's – it was greatly influenced by providers, the husband and the mother-in-law.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These results suggest that quality improvement efforts should focus on both technical and nontechnical aspects of care and target not just women, but those who influence their choice of delivery location.</p></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><p>ISRCTN17107760.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.10.002","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X16300523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
Background
The relationship between utilization of quality health services and positive health outcomes is well documented, however in low resource settings there is both a shortage of quality services and low utilization of existing services. We assessed women and men's understanding of quality in health facilities and their application of this understanding in selecting place of delivery.
Methods
Ten focus group discussions (FGD) were held between May and December 2011 (five with women and five with men). The groups had 6–11 respondents. FGDs were conducted, recorded, and transcribed in Swahili then translated into English. Transcripts were analyzed using NVivo 9 software. Conceptual framework confirmatory analysis was conducted to compare results from FGDs with pre-existing frameworks for understanding health center quality in low resource settings.
Results
High education and positive attitude of delivery staff, close proximity to the health facility, availability of providers, and modern equipment were cited as reasons for facility delivery. Expectations of complications and better care led to seeking care at higher-level institutions. The one aspect of quality that men focused on more than women was disrespectful care and health worker attitude. The choice to deliver in a hospital versus a primary care clinic or at home was not always the woman's – it was greatly influenced by providers, the husband and the mother-in-law.
Conclusions
These results suggest that quality improvement efforts should focus on both technical and nontechnical aspects of care and target not just women, but those who influence their choice of delivery location.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
