Provider perspective on use of episiotomy in obstetric practice

Shalini Singh , Tushita Thakur , Nomita Chandhiok , B.S. Dhillon
{"title":"Provider perspective on use of episiotomy in obstetric practice","authors":"Shalini Singh ,&nbsp;Tushita Thakur ,&nbsp;Nomita Chandhiok ,&nbsp;B.S. Dhillon","doi":"10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>A survey of private and public sector maternity care providers was carried out to understand their perspective on use of current guidelines advocating selective use of episiotomy. Nearly 90% of the providers were aware of guidelines on selective episiotomy use but significantly higher proportion (</span><em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.03) of private practitioners (56.6%) advocated its use in all nullipara as compared to public sector doctors (23.3%). In actual practice, however, nearly 80% providers reported performing episiotomy in more than 75% nullipara with no difference between private and public sector doctors. Thus, awareness of current evidence was not reflected in clinical practice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":91915,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jrhm.2016.02.001","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reproductive health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214420X1600019X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A survey of private and public sector maternity care providers was carried out to understand their perspective on use of current guidelines advocating selective use of episiotomy. Nearly 90% of the providers were aware of guidelines on selective episiotomy use but significantly higher proportion (p = 0.03) of private practitioners (56.6%) advocated its use in all nullipara as compared to public sector doctors (23.3%). In actual practice, however, nearly 80% providers reported performing episiotomy in more than 75% nullipara with no difference between private and public sector doctors. Thus, awareness of current evidence was not reflected in clinical practice.

会阴切开术在产科实践中的应用
对私营和公共部门的产科护理提供者进行了调查,以了解他们对使用当前倡导选择性使用会阴切开术的指南的看法。近90%的医护人员了解选择性会阴切开术的使用指南,但主张在所有无产者中使用会阴切开术的私人医生比例(56.6%)明显高于公立医生(23.3%)(p = 0.03)。然而,在实际实践中,近80%的医疗服务提供者报告说,在超过75%的产妇中进行了会阴切开术,私营和公立部门的医生之间没有区别。因此,对现有证据的认识并没有反映在临床实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信