The prosodic marking of rhetorical questions in Standard Chinese

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Katharina Zahner-Ritter , Yiya Chen , Nicole Dehé , Bettina Braun
{"title":"The prosodic marking of rhetorical questions in Standard Chinese","authors":"Katharina Zahner-Ritter ,&nbsp;Yiya Chen ,&nbsp;Nicole Dehé ,&nbsp;Bettina Braun","doi":"10.1016/j.wocn.2022.101190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study investigates the prosody of information-seeking (ISQs) and rhetorical questions (RQs) in Standard Chinese, in polar and <em>wh</em>-questions. Like in other languages, ISQs and RQs in Standard Chinese can have the same surface structure, allowing for a direct prosodic comparison between illocution types (ISQ vs RQ). Since Standard Chinese has lexical tone, the use of <em>f0</em> as a cue to illocution type may be restricted. We investigate the prosodic differences between ISQs and RQs as well as the interplay of prosodic cues to RQs. In terms of <em>f0</em>, results showed that RQs were lower in <em>f0</em>, with the <em>f0</em> range on the first word being expanded followed by <em>f0</em> compression. RQs were further longer in duration and more often realized with non-modal voice quality (glottalized voice) as compared to ISQs. These prosodic cues were largely manipulated in tandem (illocutionary pairs with larger durational differences also showed larger differences in mean <em>f0</em>; voice quality, in turn, seemed to be an additional cue). We suggest three possible explanations (assertive force, focus, speaker attitude) that unite the present findings on RQs in Standard Chinese with the findings on RQs in other, non-tonal languages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51397,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phonetics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447022000651/pdfft?md5=73492488c4d4ad9d16611c134a7b5421&pid=1-s2.0-S0095447022000651-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phonetics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0095447022000651","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigates the prosody of information-seeking (ISQs) and rhetorical questions (RQs) in Standard Chinese, in polar and wh-questions. Like in other languages, ISQs and RQs in Standard Chinese can have the same surface structure, allowing for a direct prosodic comparison between illocution types (ISQ vs RQ). Since Standard Chinese has lexical tone, the use of f0 as a cue to illocution type may be restricted. We investigate the prosodic differences between ISQs and RQs as well as the interplay of prosodic cues to RQs. In terms of f0, results showed that RQs were lower in f0, with the f0 range on the first word being expanded followed by f0 compression. RQs were further longer in duration and more often realized with non-modal voice quality (glottalized voice) as compared to ISQs. These prosodic cues were largely manipulated in tandem (illocutionary pairs with larger durational differences also showed larger differences in mean f0; voice quality, in turn, seemed to be an additional cue). We suggest three possible explanations (assertive force, focus, speaker attitude) that unite the present findings on RQs in Standard Chinese with the findings on RQs in other, non-tonal languages.

标准汉语反问句的韵律标记
本研究研究了标准汉语中信息寻求问句和反问句的韵律,包括极性反问句和wh反问句。与其他语言一样,标准汉语的中音和中音可以有相同的表面结构,从而可以直接比较不同类型的句子(中音和中音)的韵律。由于标准汉语有词汇语调,因此使用f0作为提示语类型可能会受到限制。我们研究了isq和rq之间的韵律差异,以及韵律线索对rq的相互作用。在f0方面,结果表明,在f0时rq较低,第一个单词的f0范围被扩大,然后f0被压缩。与isq相比,rq的持续时间更长,并且更经常以非模态语音质量(声门化的语音)实现。这些韵律线索在很大程度上是串联操作的(持续时间差异较大的言外语对在平均f0上也表现出较大的差异;反过来,音质似乎是一个额外的提示)。我们提出了三种可能的解释(自信力、注意力、说话人的态度),将目前对标准汉语rq的研究结果与其他非声调语言的rq研究结果结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
26.30%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The Journal of Phonetics publishes papers of an experimental or theoretical nature that deal with phonetic aspects of language and linguistic communication processes. Papers dealing with technological and/or pathological topics, or papers of an interdisciplinary nature are also suitable, provided that linguistic-phonetic principles underlie the work reported. Regular articles, review articles, and letters to the editor are published. Themed issues are also published, devoted entirely to a specific subject of interest within the field of phonetics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信