Threats to the soil microbiome from nanomaterials: A global meta and machine-learning analysis

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Sensen Chen , Ying Teng , Yongming Luo , Eiko Kuramae , Wenjie Ren
{"title":"Threats to the soil microbiome from nanomaterials: A global meta and machine-learning analysis","authors":"Sensen Chen ,&nbsp;Ying Teng ,&nbsp;Yongming Luo ,&nbsp;Eiko Kuramae ,&nbsp;Wenjie Ren","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Soil is the primary sink for released nanomaterials (NMs), but the understanding of the impacts of NMs on the soil </span>microbiome<span><span> remains fragmented. Moreover, there is currently lack of systematic approaches to evaluate the microbial ecological risks of NMs. In this study, we conducted a global meta-analysis incorporating 2134 paired observations from 107 publications from 2000 to June 2023 to comprehensively assess the effects of NMs on the soil microbiome. Additionally, we developed a machine-learning approach to predict these impacts and identified key contributing features. The results reveal that NMs have significant negative effects on soil microbial diversity (−0.96%), biomass (−14.01%), activity (−3.39%), and function (−14.44%). The impacts of NMs on fungal diversity were greater than those on bacteria. Compared with carbon NMs, metal NMs have more pronounced negative effects on various </span>soil microbial community metrics, with Ag NMs exhibiting the greatest negative impact. Ag NMs exhibited greater negative effects on microbial function than bulk Ag or Ag</span></span><sup>+</sup><span>. Nanoscale effects played a pivotal role in these adverse effects. These adverse effects are primarily associated with NM type, size and content. Two machine learning models achieved acceptable prediction accuracy in assessing the impact of NMs on the soil microbial community. This study offers an effective approach for the ecological risk assessment of NMs and provides a scientific foundation for the rational and informed application of NMs in the soil environment.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071723003103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil is the primary sink for released nanomaterials (NMs), but the understanding of the impacts of NMs on the soil microbiome remains fragmented. Moreover, there is currently lack of systematic approaches to evaluate the microbial ecological risks of NMs. In this study, we conducted a global meta-analysis incorporating 2134 paired observations from 107 publications from 2000 to June 2023 to comprehensively assess the effects of NMs on the soil microbiome. Additionally, we developed a machine-learning approach to predict these impacts and identified key contributing features. The results reveal that NMs have significant negative effects on soil microbial diversity (−0.96%), biomass (−14.01%), activity (−3.39%), and function (−14.44%). The impacts of NMs on fungal diversity were greater than those on bacteria. Compared with carbon NMs, metal NMs have more pronounced negative effects on various soil microbial community metrics, with Ag NMs exhibiting the greatest negative impact. Ag NMs exhibited greater negative effects on microbial function than bulk Ag or Ag+. Nanoscale effects played a pivotal role in these adverse effects. These adverse effects are primarily associated with NM type, size and content. Two machine learning models achieved acceptable prediction accuracy in assessing the impact of NMs on the soil microbial community. This study offers an effective approach for the ecological risk assessment of NMs and provides a scientific foundation for the rational and informed application of NMs in the soil environment.

纳米材料对土壤微生物群的威胁:一项全球元和机器学习分析
土壤是纳米材料释放的主要汇,但对纳米材料对土壤微生物群的影响的理解仍然是碎片化的。此外,目前还缺乏系统的方法来评估NMs的微生物生态风险。在这项研究中,我们进行了一项全球荟萃分析,纳入了2000年至2023年6月107份出版物中的2134对观测结果,以全面评估NMs对土壤微生物组的影响。此外,我们开发了一种机器学习方法来预测这些影响,并确定了关键的贡献特征。结果表明,施用NMs对土壤微生物多样性(- 0.96%)、生物量(- 14.01%)、活性(- 3.39%)和功能(- 14.44%)有显著的负影响。NMs对真菌多样性的影响大于对细菌的影响。与碳纳米管相比,金属纳米管对土壤微生物群落各指标的负面影响更为显著,其中银纳米管的负面影响最大。Ag NMs对微生物功能的负面影响大于Ag或Ag+。纳米效应在这些不良反应中起着关键作用。这些不良反应主要与纳米颗粒的类型、大小和含量有关。两个机器学习模型在评估NMs对土壤微生物群落的影响方面取得了可接受的预测精度。本研究为土壤环境中氮肥的生态风险评价提供了有效的方法,为氮肥在土壤环境中的合理应用提供了科学依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信