Efectos de la pandemia por COVID-19 con relación al ACV isquémico. ¿La pandemia realmente lo cambió todo? Un estudio comparativo pre-post COVID-19 con revisión de la literatura
Julián Fernández Boccazzi, Xavier Merchán del Hierro, Gabriel Persi, Josefina Seguí, Victoria Aldinio, Santiago Muniagurria, Jonathan Cubas Guillen, Emilia M. Gatto, Afra Gilbert, Nahuel Pereira de Silva
{"title":"Efectos de la pandemia por COVID-19 con relación al ACV isquémico. ¿La pandemia realmente lo cambió todo? Un estudio comparativo pre-post COVID-19 con revisión de la literatura","authors":"Julián Fernández Boccazzi, Xavier Merchán del Hierro, Gabriel Persi, Josefina Seguí, Victoria Aldinio, Santiago Muniagurria, Jonathan Cubas Guillen, Emilia M. Gatto, Afra Gilbert, Nahuel Pereira de Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.neuarg.2022.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Ischemic stroke is the third leading cause of death and the first cause of disability in the world. Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has generated changes in daily medical practice, as well as an impact on access to health centers.</p><p>The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of admissions, consultation time and treatment rates of stroke in our center.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Descriptive and retrospective study, with 115 patients between March 2019 and March 2021. Clinical characteristics, admissions time, severity and treatment rates pre-pandemic and during the same were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Both groups presented mild events (71% vs. 59%, <em>P</em> <!-->><!--> <!-->.05). There was an increase in the time from consultation to initiation of thrombolysis therapy during the pandemic (median 2.1 vs. 3.5<!--> <!-->h, <em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.02). No significant differences were observed in reperfusion rates, consultation time and door-to-needle time.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In our study, a significant difference was observed between the time of symptom onset and treatment with thrombolysis during the pandemic. On the other hand, no significant differences were observed in relation to the number of admissions, consultation time and door-to-needle time or treatment rate of patients with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p>We believe that this work can provide an approach to epidemiology in the private regional setting and a potential basis for further analysis of the collateral damage and long-term consequences generated by the COVID-19 pandemic.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39051,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia Argentina","volume":"14 4","pages":"Pages 244-250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1853002822000507/pdfft?md5=0e49d4861a5a4e2d483ba51e5c6d4d45&pid=1-s2.0-S1853002822000507-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia Argentina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1853002822000507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction and objectives
Ischemic stroke is the third leading cause of death and the first cause of disability in the world. Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has generated changes in daily medical practice, as well as an impact on access to health centers.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of admissions, consultation time and treatment rates of stroke in our center.
Materials and methods
Descriptive and retrospective study, with 115 patients between March 2019 and March 2021. Clinical characteristics, admissions time, severity and treatment rates pre-pandemic and during the same were compared.
Results
Both groups presented mild events (71% vs. 59%, P > .05). There was an increase in the time from consultation to initiation of thrombolysis therapy during the pandemic (median 2.1 vs. 3.5 h, P = .02). No significant differences were observed in reperfusion rates, consultation time and door-to-needle time.
Conclusion
In our study, a significant difference was observed between the time of symptom onset and treatment with thrombolysis during the pandemic. On the other hand, no significant differences were observed in relation to the number of admissions, consultation time and door-to-needle time or treatment rate of patients with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic.
We believe that this work can provide an approach to epidemiology in the private regional setting and a potential basis for further analysis of the collateral damage and long-term consequences generated by the COVID-19 pandemic.
简介和目的缺血性中风是世界上第三大死亡原因和第一大致残原因。自2020年3月以来,COVID-19大流行给日常医疗实践带来了变化,也对前往医疗中心的机会产生了影响。本研究的目的是评估COVID-19大流行对我中心卒中入院人数、会诊时间和治愈率的影响。材料和方法:描述性和回顾性研究,在2019年3月至2021年3月期间纳入115例患者。比较大流行前和大流行期间的临床特征、入院时间、严重程度和治疗率。结果两组均出现轻度事件(71% vs. 59%, P >. 05)。在大流行期间,从就诊到开始溶栓治疗的时间有所增加(中位数分别为2.1小时和3.5小时,P = 0.02)。两组再灌注率、会诊时间、门到针时间均无显著差异。结论在我们的研究中,观察到大流行期间症状出现时间和溶栓治疗时间有显著差异。另一方面,在COVID-19大流行期间,卒中患者的入院次数、就诊时间、门到针时间或治疗率均无显著差异。我们认为,这项工作可以为私人区域环境中的流行病学提供一种方法,并为进一步分析COVID-19大流行造成的附带损害和长期后果提供潜在基础。
期刊介绍:
Neurología Argentina es la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Neurológica Argentina. Todos los artículos, publicados en español, son sometidos a un proceso de revisión sobre ciego por pares con la finalidad de ofrecer información original, relevante y de alta calidad que abarca todos los aspectos de la Neurología y la Neurociencia.