Evidence for a single rather than a triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobe: An fMRI recognition memory replication study

Q4 Neuroscience
Julie Van , Sam E. Nielsen , C. Brock Kirwan
{"title":"Evidence for a single rather than a triple dissociation in the medial temporal lobe: An fMRI recognition memory replication study","authors":"Julie Van ,&nbsp;Sam E. Nielsen ,&nbsp;C. Brock Kirwan","doi":"10.1016/j.ynirp.2022.100135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Common research practices in neuroimaging studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging may produce outcomes that are difficult to replicate. Results that cannot be replicated have contributed to a replication crisis in psychology, neuroscience, and other disciplines over the years. Here we replicate two previous papers in which the authors present two analysis paths for a dataset in which participants underwent fMRI while performing a recognition memory test for old and new words. Both studies found activation in the medial temporal lobe including the hippocampus, with the first demonstrating a distinction in activation corresponding to true and perceived oldness of stimuli and the second demonstrating that activation reflects the subjective experience of the participant. We replicated the behavioral and MRI acquisition parameters reported in the two target articles (Daselaar et al., 2006; Daselaar et al., 2006) with N = 53 participants. We focused fMRI analyses on regions of interest reported in the target articles examining fMRI activation for differences corresponding with true and perceived oldness and those associated with the subjective memory experiences of recollection, familiarity, and novelty. Comparisons between true and perceived oldness revealed main effects not only for true, but also perceived oldness along with a significant interaction. We replicate the findings of recollection and familiarity signals in the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe cortex, respectively, but failed to replicate a novelty signal in the anterior medial temporal lobe. These results remained when we analyzed only correct trials, indicating that the effects were not due to selectively averaging correct and incorrect trials. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that activation in the hippocampus corresponds to the subjective experience associated with correct recognition memory retrieval.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74277,"journal":{"name":"Neuroimage. Reports","volume":"2 4","pages":"Article 100135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956022000599/pdfft?md5=6dcbe8870ef9b5d454b8947f4976a29e&pid=1-s2.0-S2666956022000599-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroimage. Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666956022000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Common research practices in neuroimaging studies using functional magnetic resonance imaging may produce outcomes that are difficult to replicate. Results that cannot be replicated have contributed to a replication crisis in psychology, neuroscience, and other disciplines over the years. Here we replicate two previous papers in which the authors present two analysis paths for a dataset in which participants underwent fMRI while performing a recognition memory test for old and new words. Both studies found activation in the medial temporal lobe including the hippocampus, with the first demonstrating a distinction in activation corresponding to true and perceived oldness of stimuli and the second demonstrating that activation reflects the subjective experience of the participant. We replicated the behavioral and MRI acquisition parameters reported in the two target articles (Daselaar et al., 2006; Daselaar et al., 2006) with N = 53 participants. We focused fMRI analyses on regions of interest reported in the target articles examining fMRI activation for differences corresponding with true and perceived oldness and those associated with the subjective memory experiences of recollection, familiarity, and novelty. Comparisons between true and perceived oldness revealed main effects not only for true, but also perceived oldness along with a significant interaction. We replicate the findings of recollection and familiarity signals in the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe cortex, respectively, but failed to replicate a novelty signal in the anterior medial temporal lobe. These results remained when we analyzed only correct trials, indicating that the effects were not due to selectively averaging correct and incorrect trials. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that activation in the hippocampus corresponds to the subjective experience associated with correct recognition memory retrieval.

内侧颞叶的单一而非三重分离的证据:fMRI识别记忆复制研究
在使用功能性磁共振成像的神经成像研究中,常见的研究实践可能产生难以复制的结果。多年来,无法复制的结果导致了心理学、神经科学和其他学科的复制危机。在这里,我们复制了之前的两篇论文,在这两篇论文中,作者为一个数据集提供了两种分析路径,在这个数据集中,参与者在对新旧单词进行识别记忆测试时进行了功能磁共振成像。两项研究都发现了包括海马体在内的内侧颞叶的激活,第一个研究证明了刺激的真实和感知年龄的激活是不同的,第二个研究表明激活反映了参与者的主观体验。我们复制了两篇目标文章中报道的行为和MRI采集参数(Daselaar等人,2006;Daselaar et al., 2006), N = 53名参与者。我们将fMRI分析集中在目标文章中报道的感兴趣区域,检查fMRI激活与真实和感知的衰老以及与回忆、熟悉和新奇的主观记忆经验相关的差异。真实年龄和感知年龄之间的比较揭示了不仅对真实年龄有主要影响,而且对感知年龄也有显著的相互作用。我们分别复制了海马和内侧颞叶皮层的回忆和熟悉信号的发现,但未能复制内侧颞叶前部的新奇信号。当我们只分析正确的试验时,这些结果仍然存在,表明影响不是由于有选择地平均正确和不正确的试验。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,海马体的激活与正确识别记忆检索相关的主观体验相对应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuroimage. Reports
Neuroimage. Reports Neuroscience (General)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
87 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信