Maximillian T Diaz, Joel B Harley, Jennifer A Nichols
{"title":"Sensitivity Analysis of Upper Limb Musculoskeletal Models During Isometric and Isokinetic Tasks.","authors":"Maximillian T Diaz, Joel B Harley, Jennifer A Nichols","doi":"10.1115/1.4064056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sensitivity coefficients are used to understand how errors in subject-specific musculoskeletal model parameters influence model predictions. Previous sensitivity studies in the lower limb calculated sensitivity using perturbations that do not fully represent the diversity of the population. Hence, the present study performs sensitivity analysis in the upper limb using a large synthetic dataset to capture greater physiological diversity. The large dataset (n = 401 synthetic subjects) was created by adjusting maximum isometric force, optimal fiber length, pennation angle, and bone mass to induce atrophy, hypertrophy, osteoporosis, and osteopetrosis in two upper limb musculoskeletal models. Simulations of three isometric and two isokinetic upper limb tasks were performed using each synthetic subject to predict muscle activations. Sensitivity coefficients were calculated using three different methods (two point, linear regression, and sensitivity functions) to understand how changes in Hill-type parameters influenced predicted muscle activations. The sensitivity coefficient methods were then compared by evaluating how well the coefficients accounted for measurement uncertainty. This was done by using the sensitivity coefficients to predict the range of muscle activations given known errors in measuring musculoskeletal parameters from medical imaging. Sensitivity functions were found to best account for measurement uncertainty. Simulated muscle activations were most sensitive to optimal fiber length and maximum isometric force during upper limb tasks. Importantly, the level of sensitivity was muscle and task dependent. These findings provide a foundation for how large synthetic datasets can be applied to capture physiologically diverse populations and understand how model parameters influence predictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10750789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064056","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Sensitivity coefficients are used to understand how errors in subject-specific musculoskeletal model parameters influence model predictions. Previous sensitivity studies in the lower limb calculated sensitivity using perturbations that do not fully represent the diversity of the population. Hence, the present study performs sensitivity analysis in the upper limb using a large synthetic dataset to capture greater physiological diversity. The large dataset (n = 401 synthetic subjects) was created by adjusting maximum isometric force, optimal fiber length, pennation angle, and bone mass to induce atrophy, hypertrophy, osteoporosis, and osteopetrosis in two upper limb musculoskeletal models. Simulations of three isometric and two isokinetic upper limb tasks were performed using each synthetic subject to predict muscle activations. Sensitivity coefficients were calculated using three different methods (two point, linear regression, and sensitivity functions) to understand how changes in Hill-type parameters influenced predicted muscle activations. The sensitivity coefficient methods were then compared by evaluating how well the coefficients accounted for measurement uncertainty. This was done by using the sensitivity coefficients to predict the range of muscle activations given known errors in measuring musculoskeletal parameters from medical imaging. Sensitivity functions were found to best account for measurement uncertainty. Simulated muscle activations were most sensitive to optimal fiber length and maximum isometric force during upper limb tasks. Importantly, the level of sensitivity was muscle and task dependent. These findings provide a foundation for how large synthetic datasets can be applied to capture physiologically diverse populations and understand how model parameters influence predictions.
期刊介绍:
Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.