{"title":"Occupational Therapy Assessments of Cortical or Cerebral Visual Impairment: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Orli Weisser-Pike, Anita Witt Mitchell, Leah Cordova","doi":"10.5014/ajot.2023.050313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Cortical or cerebral visual impairment (CVI), a leading cause of visual dysfunction in children across the globe, can result in delayed development of fine and gross motor skills, functional mobility, and socialization, which affects all areas of occupation. No assessments are recommended for occupational therapy practitioners working with children with CVI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To appraise the measurement properties and clinical utility of CVI assessments appropriate for use by occupational therapy practitioners.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.</p><p><strong>Study selection and data collection: </strong>We followed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures for relevant studies.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 590 records yielded 15 studies of the measurement properties of 12 assessment tools, 8 patient-reported outcome measures and 4 clinician-reported or performance-based outcome measures. We report on the quality of measurement properties of 10 of the 12 outcome measures. None had high-quality evidence of content validity, structural validity, or test-retest reliability. Most had indeterminate internal consistency as a result of a lack of confirmatory factor analysis. Three instruments demonstrated high quality and sufficient construct validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>On the basis of the COSMIN guidelines, all 12 outcome measures have the potential to be recommended but require further study before definitive recommendations can be made. What This Article Adds: This is the first systematic review of assessments of CVI feasible for use by occupational therapy practitioners. High-quality studies of measurement properties are lacking. Further examination of the measurement properties of outcome measures is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":48317,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"77 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2023.050313","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Importance: Cortical or cerebral visual impairment (CVI), a leading cause of visual dysfunction in children across the globe, can result in delayed development of fine and gross motor skills, functional mobility, and socialization, which affects all areas of occupation. No assessments are recommended for occupational therapy practitioners working with children with CVI.
Objective: To appraise the measurement properties and clinical utility of CVI assessments appropriate for use by occupational therapy practitioners.
Data sources: MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science.
Study selection and data collection: We followed the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures for relevant studies.
Findings: A total of 590 records yielded 15 studies of the measurement properties of 12 assessment tools, 8 patient-reported outcome measures and 4 clinician-reported or performance-based outcome measures. We report on the quality of measurement properties of 10 of the 12 outcome measures. None had high-quality evidence of content validity, structural validity, or test-retest reliability. Most had indeterminate internal consistency as a result of a lack of confirmatory factor analysis. Three instruments demonstrated high quality and sufficient construct validity.
Conclusions and relevance: On the basis of the COSMIN guidelines, all 12 outcome measures have the potential to be recommended but require further study before definitive recommendations can be made. What This Article Adds: This is the first systematic review of assessments of CVI feasible for use by occupational therapy practitioners. High-quality studies of measurement properties are lacking. Further examination of the measurement properties of outcome measures is required.
重要性:皮质或大脑视觉障碍(CVI)是全球儿童视觉功能障碍的主要原因,可导致精细和大肌肉运动技能,功能活动和社交的延迟发展,影响所有职业领域。不建议从事CVI儿童工作的职业治疗从业人员进行评估。目的:评价适合职业治疗从业人员使用的CVI评估的测量特性和临床应用。数据来源:MEDLINE通过PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science。研究选择和数据收集:我们遵循基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准(COSMIN)指南,对相关研究中患者报告的结果测量进行系统评价。结果:共有590条记录产生了15项关于12种评估工具的测量特性的研究,8项患者报告的结果测量和4项临床报告的或基于绩效的结果测量。我们报告了12个结果测量中10个测量属性的质量。没有内容效度、结构效度或重测信度的高质量证据。由于缺乏验证性因素分析,大多数具有不确定的内部一致性。三种工具均表现出较高的质量和足够的结构效度。结论和相关性:在COSMIN指南的基础上,所有12项结果措施都有可能被推荐,但在提出明确建议之前需要进一步研究。本文补充:这是对职业治疗从业者使用的CVI可行性评估的第一个系统综述。缺乏对测量特性的高质量研究。需要进一步检查结果测量的测量特性。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Occupational Therapy (AJOT) is an official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, Inc. and is published 6 times per year. This peer reviewed journal focuses on research, practice, and health care issues in the field of occupational therapy. AOTA members receive 6 issues of AJOT per year and have online access to archived abstracts and full-text articles. Nonmembers may view abstracts online but must purchase full-text articles.