Do spatial practices legitimize the values promoted by organizations? An ethno-architectural survey of governance and sustainable development in coworking spaces

IF 1.2 4区 管理学 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Sabine Carton, Stéphanie Dadour, Nathalie Mitev, Lucie Perrier
{"title":"Do spatial practices legitimize the values promoted by organizations? An ethno-architectural survey of governance and sustainable development in coworking spaces","authors":"Sabine Carton, Stéphanie Dadour, Nathalie Mitev, Lucie Perrier","doi":"10.1080/14759551.2023.2272278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTCompared to traditional organizations, a coworking organization needs to be clearly distinguished, recognized and identified in its environment. The question of legitimacy is therefore relevant for coworking spaces. We investigate their spatial practices through Lefebvre’s spatial triad, and how they affect their organizational legitimacy, in order to establish whether these practices support the values promoted by coworking organizations. Based on an ethno-architectural survey, interviews and an analysis of their websites, we focus on two main values promoted by the collaborative spaces we investigated: alternative modes of governance and sustainability. We found that their spatial practices did not fully align with these values. We introduce the concept of spatial legitimacy, and our ethno-architectural survey contributes in methodological terms to the analysis of spatial practices in the field of organizational studies.KEYWORDS: Spatial practicesSpatial legitimacyCoworking spacesEthno-architectural survey Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 https://wiki.coworking.org/w/page/67817489/The%20Values%20of%20Open%20Coworking (July 2021).2 https://lesgrandsvoisins.org/les-grands-voisins/gouvernance/ [viewed on November 15, 2020].3 http://91.121.3.209/altercartonew/site0/index0.html#art_PR-Adhesion [viewed on November 15, 2020].4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PechaKucha5 https://thecamp.fr/fr/a-propos [viewed on November 9, 2020].6 https://woma.fr/lassociation/le-projet-woma/ [viewed on November 9, 2020].7 https://lesgrandsvoisins.org/la-vie-du-site-2/eco-responsabilite/ [viewed on November 15, 2020].8 http://91.121.3.209/altercartonew/site0/index0.html#art_PR-Que%20fait%20altercarto [viewed on November 15, 2020].9 https://www.ledonut-marseille.com/notre-approche [viewed on November 15, 2020].10 https://thecamp.fr/fr/document/rapport-developpement-durable-2018, p. 17. [Viewed on November 9, 2020].Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Université Grenoble Alpes : [Grant Number G7H-IRS17H76].","PeriodicalId":10824,"journal":{"name":"Culture and Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2023.2272278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTCompared to traditional organizations, a coworking organization needs to be clearly distinguished, recognized and identified in its environment. The question of legitimacy is therefore relevant for coworking spaces. We investigate their spatial practices through Lefebvre’s spatial triad, and how they affect their organizational legitimacy, in order to establish whether these practices support the values promoted by coworking organizations. Based on an ethno-architectural survey, interviews and an analysis of their websites, we focus on two main values promoted by the collaborative spaces we investigated: alternative modes of governance and sustainability. We found that their spatial practices did not fully align with these values. We introduce the concept of spatial legitimacy, and our ethno-architectural survey contributes in methodological terms to the analysis of spatial practices in the field of organizational studies.KEYWORDS: Spatial practicesSpatial legitimacyCoworking spacesEthno-architectural survey Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 https://wiki.coworking.org/w/page/67817489/The%20Values%20of%20Open%20Coworking (July 2021).2 https://lesgrandsvoisins.org/les-grands-voisins/gouvernance/ [viewed on November 15, 2020].3 http://91.121.3.209/altercartonew/site0/index0.html#art_PR-Adhesion [viewed on November 15, 2020].4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PechaKucha5 https://thecamp.fr/fr/a-propos [viewed on November 9, 2020].6 https://woma.fr/lassociation/le-projet-woma/ [viewed on November 9, 2020].7 https://lesgrandsvoisins.org/la-vie-du-site-2/eco-responsabilite/ [viewed on November 15, 2020].8 http://91.121.3.209/altercartonew/site0/index0.html#art_PR-Que%20fait%20altercarto [viewed on November 15, 2020].9 https://www.ledonut-marseille.com/notre-approche [viewed on November 15, 2020].10 https://thecamp.fr/fr/document/rapport-developpement-durable-2018, p. 17. [Viewed on November 9, 2020].Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Université Grenoble Alpes : [Grant Number G7H-IRS17H76].
空间实践是否使组织倡导的价值观合法化?联合办公空间中治理和可持续发展的民族建筑调查
摘要与传统组织相比,共享办公组织需要在其所处的环境中得到清晰的区分、认可和识别。因此,合法性问题与共享办公空间相关。我们通过列斐伏尔的空间三位一体来研究他们的空间实践,以及它们如何影响他们的组织合法性,以确定这些实践是否支持共同工作组织所倡导的价值观。基于民族建筑调查、访谈和对他们网站的分析,我们关注于我们所调查的协作空间所促进的两个主要价值:治理的替代模式和可持续性。我们发现他们的空间实践并不完全符合这些价值观。我们引入了空间合法性的概念,我们的民族建筑调查在方法论上有助于分析组织研究领域的空间实践。关键词:空间实践空间合法性共享空间民族建筑调查披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1 https://wiki.coworking.org/w/page/67817489/The%20Values%20of%20Open%20Coworking(2021年7月)。2 https://lesgrandsvoisins.org/les-grands-voisins/gouvernance/[2020年11月15日浏览]。3 http://91.121.3.209/altercartonew/site0/index0.html#art_PR-Adhesion[2020年11月15日浏览]。4 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PechaKucha5 https://thecamp.fr/fr/a-propos[2020年11月9日浏览]。6 https://woma.fr/lassociation/le-projet-woma/[2020年11月9日浏览]。7 https://lesgrandsvoisins.org/la-vie-du-site-2/eco-responsabilite/[2020年11月15日浏览]。8 http://91.121.3.209/altercartonew/site0/index0.html#art_PR-Que%20fait%20altercarto[2020年11月15日浏览]。9 https://www.ledonut-marseille.com/notre-approche[2020年11月15日浏览]。10 https://thecamp.fr/fr/document/rapport-developpement-durable-2018,第17页。[2020年11月9日观看]。本研究得到了法国格勒诺布尔阿尔卑斯大学的支持:[批准号:G7H-IRS17H76]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Culture and Organization was founded in 1995 as Studies in Cultures, Organizations and Societies . It represents the intersection of academic disciplines that have developed distinct qualitative, empirical and theoretical vocabularies to research organization, culture and related social phenomena. Culture and Organization features refereed articles that offer innovative insights and provoke discussion. It particularly offers papers which employ ethnographic, critical and interpretive approaches, as practised in such disciplines as organizational, communication, media and cultural studies, which go beyond description and use data to advance theoretical reflection. The Journal also presents papers which advance our conceptual understanding of organizational phenomena. Culture and Organization features refereed articles that offer innovative insights and provoke discussion. It particularly offers papers which employ ethnographic, critical and interpretive approaches, as practised in such disciplines as communication, media and cultural studies, which go beyond description and use data to advance theoretical reflection. The journal also presents papers which advance our conceptual understand-ing of organizational phenomena.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信