{"title":"A simpler elementary proof that <i>e</i> is irrational","authors":"F. M. S. Lima","doi":"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractIn this short note I present an elementary proof of irrationality for the number e, the base of the natural logarithm. It is simpler than other known proofs as it does not use comparisons with geometric series, nor Beukers' integrals, and it does not assume that e is a rational number from the beginning.Keywords: Irrationality proofEuler's numberMaclaurin seriesalternating seriesMathematic Subject classifications: 41-0197-0111J72 AcknowledgmentsThe author thanks M. R. Javier for some hints on how to simplify and reduce his initial proof without losing the mathematical rigour. Thanks are also due to the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and hints on additional references.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 The above conclusion that 1/e is not an integer makes unnecessary to check the case q=1.","PeriodicalId":14026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AbstractIn this short note I present an elementary proof of irrationality for the number e, the base of the natural logarithm. It is simpler than other known proofs as it does not use comparisons with geometric series, nor Beukers' integrals, and it does not assume that e is a rational number from the beginning.Keywords: Irrationality proofEuler's numberMaclaurin seriesalternating seriesMathematic Subject classifications: 41-0197-0111J72 AcknowledgmentsThe author thanks M. R. Javier for some hints on how to simplify and reduce his initial proof without losing the mathematical rigour. Thanks are also due to the anonymous reviewers for their suggestions and hints on additional references.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author.Notes1 The above conclusion that 1/e is not an integer makes unnecessary to check the case q=1.
期刊介绍:
Mathematics is pervading every study and technique in our modern world, bringing ever more sharply into focus the responsibilities laid upon those whose task it is to teach it. Most prominent among these is the difficulty of presenting an interdisciplinary approach so that one professional group may benefit from the experience of others. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology provides a medium by which a wide range of experience in mathematical education can be presented, assimilated and eventually adapted to everyday needs in schools, colleges, polytechnics, universities, industry and commerce. Contributions will be welcomed from lecturers, teachers and users of mathematics at all levels on the contents of syllabuses and methods of presentation.