Poematis genus ambigui I concetti di veritas, fictio e visio fra Petrarca e Boccaccio

Benedetta Monaco
{"title":"Poematis genus ambigui I concetti di veritas, fictio e visio fra Petrarca e Boccaccio","authors":"Benedetta Monaco","doi":"10.21747/21836884/med40a8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper aims to analyse, through multiple intertextual references, the reception of classical and me-dieval theory about relationship between veritas, fictio and poesis through Boccaccio’sand Petrarca’s examples. Starting from etymological and interpretative dissociation between the concepts of poetry and fiction, allowed by the rediscovery of Cicero’s Pro Archia, Petrarca and Boccaccio reaffirm the moral truth as center of poetic discourse, in defense of poetry against medieval accusations of defectum veritatis. A particular case of study is offered by the dialogicity of the elements of veritas and fictio in the new perspective of humanistic reworking of dream-vision’s literary theory in Boccaccio’s Amorosa Visione, and Petrarca’s Triumphi. This study highlights specifically the ways in which each author not only drew upon previous theoretical models (such as Macrobius Commentarium in Somnium Scipionis) and interacted with the genre of religious prophetic visions (like the Visio Alberici, Vision de Tondale)and the allegorism of Divine Comedy in the composition of his own oneiric texts, but also how, through their literary criticisms, they influenced the analysis of the symbols in subsequent literature.","PeriodicalId":497912,"journal":{"name":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediaevalia, textos e estudos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21747/21836884/med40a8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper aims to analyse, through multiple intertextual references, the reception of classical and me-dieval theory about relationship between veritas, fictio and poesis through Boccaccio’sand Petrarca’s examples. Starting from etymological and interpretative dissociation between the concepts of poetry and fiction, allowed by the rediscovery of Cicero’s Pro Archia, Petrarca and Boccaccio reaffirm the moral truth as center of poetic discourse, in defense of poetry against medieval accusations of defectum veritatis. A particular case of study is offered by the dialogicity of the elements of veritas and fictio in the new perspective of humanistic reworking of dream-vision’s literary theory in Boccaccio’s Amorosa Visione, and Petrarca’s Triumphi. This study highlights specifically the ways in which each author not only drew upon previous theoretical models (such as Macrobius Commentarium in Somnium Scipionis) and interacted with the genre of religious prophetic visions (like the Visio Alberici, Vision de Tondale)and the allegorism of Divine Comedy in the composition of his own oneiric texts, but also how, through their literary criticisms, they influenced the analysis of the symbols in subsequent literature.
帕特拉克和波卡乔之间的真理、菲蒂乌斯和维西奥的概念含糊不清
本文以薄伽丘和佩特拉卡为例,通过多种互文参考,分析古典和中世纪关于真理、小说和诗歌关系的理论的接受情况。从词源学和解释上诗歌和小说概念之间的分离开始,由西塞罗的《论阿奇亚》的重新发现所允许,彼特拉卡和薄伽丘重申了道德真理作为诗歌话语的中心,为诗歌辩护,反对中世纪对“真理的缺失”的指责。以薄伽丘的《阿莫罗莎·维西奥》和佩特拉卡的《凯旋》为例,从人本主义视角对梦境文学理论进行重构,从而探讨了真实性与虚构要素的对谈性。这项研究特别强调了每位作者不仅借鉴了先前的理论模型(如《Somnium scipiis》中的Macrobius Commentarium),并在其自己的梦境文本的构成中与宗教预言异象(如《Visio Alberici》、《Vision de Tondale》)和《神曲》的寓言相互作用的方式,而且还通过他们的文学批评,他们如何影响了后来文学中对符号的分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信