The body of constitutional control as a subject of constitutionalizing criminal procedure legislation

A.D. Rakhmetulin
{"title":"The body of constitutional control as a subject of constitutionalizing criminal procedure legislation","authors":"A.D. Rakhmetulin","doi":"10.32523/2616-6844-2023-144-3-71-79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing influence of constitutional ideas and principles on the system of legal regulation, including the regulation of pre-trial and judicial stages of criminal proceedings, has had a serious impact on the emergence and development of the concept and practice of constitutionalizing the legal system in modern states. The same trend has also affected the sphere of criminal proceedings, since, firstly, it is objectified by the need to improve the system of protecting human and civil rights and freedoms. Secondly, this trend is due to the fact that the subjects of criminal proceedings involved in the criminal process, on the one hand, are protected by the rights that are established in constitutional norms and regulations, on the other hand, these rights may be restricted in cases provided for by law. Determination of the balance in this matter is provided by law enforcement agencies in the process of law enforcement activities. At the same time, when situations arise when there are doubts about the constitutionality of the norms of criminal procedure legislation, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan has the last word in the dispute about the right, which expands the boundaries of constitutional legality through the adoption of regulatory decisions. In this aspect, the article analyzes the activity of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan as one of the main subjects of the constitutionalizing the norms of criminal proceedings. The author of the article examines the work of the constitutional control body through the content of its normative resolutions, which are an important source of constitutionalizing criminal procedure law.","PeriodicalId":485485,"journal":{"name":"Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университетінің хабаршысы","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университетінің хабаршысы","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-6844-2023-144-3-71-79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing influence of constitutional ideas and principles on the system of legal regulation, including the regulation of pre-trial and judicial stages of criminal proceedings, has had a serious impact on the emergence and development of the concept and practice of constitutionalizing the legal system in modern states. The same trend has also affected the sphere of criminal proceedings, since, firstly, it is objectified by the need to improve the system of protecting human and civil rights and freedoms. Secondly, this trend is due to the fact that the subjects of criminal proceedings involved in the criminal process, on the one hand, are protected by the rights that are established in constitutional norms and regulations, on the other hand, these rights may be restricted in cases provided for by law. Determination of the balance in this matter is provided by law enforcement agencies in the process of law enforcement activities. At the same time, when situations arise when there are doubts about the constitutionality of the norms of criminal procedure legislation, the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan has the last word in the dispute about the right, which expands the boundaries of constitutional legality through the adoption of regulatory decisions. In this aspect, the article analyzes the activity of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan as one of the main subjects of the constitutionalizing the norms of criminal proceedings. The author of the article examines the work of the constitutional control body through the content of its normative resolutions, which are an important source of constitutionalizing criminal procedure law.
宪法控制主体作为刑事诉讼立法的宪法化主体
宪法思想和原则对包括刑事诉讼审前和司法阶段在内的法律规制制度的影响越来越大,对现代国家法律制度宪政化理念和实践的产生和发展产生了严重影响。同样的趋势也影响到刑事诉讼领域,因为,首先,由于需要改进保护人权和公民权利与自由的制度,这一趋势是客观的。第二,出现这种趋势的原因是,刑事诉讼过程中涉及的刑事诉讼主体一方面受到宪法规范和条例所规定的权利的保护,另一方面,这些权利在法律规定的情况下可能受到限制。在这个问题上的平衡是由执法机构在执法活动的过程中提供的。同时,在对刑事诉讼立法规范的合宪性产生质疑的情况下,哈萨克斯坦共和国宪法法院在权利争议中具有最终决定权,通过通过规范性决定扩大了宪法合法性的界限。在这方面,文章分析了哈萨克斯坦共和国宪法法院作为刑事诉讼规范宪法化的主体之一的活动。宪法监督机构的规范性决议是刑事诉讼法宪法化的重要来源,本文通过其规范性决议的内容来审视宪法监督机构的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信