Trends in German Criminal Procedure Law

Georg Gesk
{"title":"Trends in German Criminal Procedure Law","authors":"Georg Gesk","doi":"10.32523/2616-6844-2023-144-3-106-115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"German criminal procedure law is under constant reconstruction, since its promulgation in the 1870s, it was changed more than 200 times. When a law undergoes long term changes, it is especially interesting to take account of specific trends – where does normative restructuring happen and how are different spheres of reconstruction interrelated. This contribution identifies 4 distinct areas where topics either remain very stable or where criminal procedure law undergoes profound changes. One area that is rather constant is the interest in efficiency of criminal investigation, trial, and sentencing. However, within this common interest in efficiency, we see important changes in the realm of human rights guarantees. Since the German Federal Constitutional Court did substantially change its interpretation of human rights, insisting upon a core of absolute protection within each and every human right, institutional safeguards of human rights in criminal procedure had to be amended, leading to a new emphasis on the principle of proportionality. While this is a trend that is mainly concerned with serious crime, lesser offenses are subject to widespread procedural decriminalization. Such widespread decriminalization is only possible because the role of the victim was newly assessed. Newfound possibilities to actively participate in criminal procedure or to interact with criminal procedure increase acceptance for procedural outcomes apart from criminal sentencing.","PeriodicalId":485485,"journal":{"name":"Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университетінің хабаршысы","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Л.Н. Гумилев атындағы Еуразия ұлттық университетінің хабаршысы","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-6844-2023-144-3-106-115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

German criminal procedure law is under constant reconstruction, since its promulgation in the 1870s, it was changed more than 200 times. When a law undergoes long term changes, it is especially interesting to take account of specific trends – where does normative restructuring happen and how are different spheres of reconstruction interrelated. This contribution identifies 4 distinct areas where topics either remain very stable or where criminal procedure law undergoes profound changes. One area that is rather constant is the interest in efficiency of criminal investigation, trial, and sentencing. However, within this common interest in efficiency, we see important changes in the realm of human rights guarantees. Since the German Federal Constitutional Court did substantially change its interpretation of human rights, insisting upon a core of absolute protection within each and every human right, institutional safeguards of human rights in criminal procedure had to be amended, leading to a new emphasis on the principle of proportionality. While this is a trend that is mainly concerned with serious crime, lesser offenses are subject to widespread procedural decriminalization. Such widespread decriminalization is only possible because the role of the victim was newly assessed. Newfound possibilities to actively participate in criminal procedure or to interact with criminal procedure increase acceptance for procedural outcomes apart from criminal sentencing.
德国刑事诉讼法的发展趋势
德国刑事诉讼法自19世纪70年代颁布以来,经历了200多次修改,处于不断的重构之中。当一项法律经历长期变化时,特别值得注意的是考虑到具体的趋势- -规范性的改革在哪里发生以及不同领域的重建如何相互关联。这篇文章指出了四个不同的领域,其中的主题要么保持稳定,要么刑事诉讼法发生了深刻的变化。一个相当稳定的领域是对刑事调查、审判和量刑效率的关注。然而,在这种对效率的共同关心范围内,我们看到人权保障领域的重要变化。由于德国联邦宪法法院确实在很大程度上改变了对人权的解释,坚持在每一项人权中都有绝对保护的核心,因此必须修正刑事诉讼中对人权的体制保障,从而重新强调相称原则。虽然这一趋势主要与严重犯罪有关,但较轻的犯罪也受到广泛的程序性非刑事化。如此广泛的除罪化是可能的,因为受害者的作用得到了新的评估。积极参与刑事诉讼程序或与刑事诉讼程序互动的新可能性增加了对刑事判决以外的程序结果的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信