THE MOORS AND BYZANTINE EMPEROR HERACLIUS (610–641 AD) BY “THE CHRONICLE” OF JOHN OF NIKIU: A SOURCE-STUDY PERSPECTIVE

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Е. А. Мekhamadiev
{"title":"THE MOORS AND BYZANTINE EMPEROR HERACLIUS (610–641 AD) BY “THE CHRONICLE” OF JOHN OF NIKIU: A SOURCE-STUDY PERSPECTIVE","authors":"Е. А. Мekhamadiev","doi":"10.17072/2219-3111-2023-2-5-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with a rather rare and little-studied text – the “Chronicle” of John of Nikiu, a Coptic chronicler who lived in Egypt in the second half of the 7th century and headed the bishopric in the city of Nikiu. The “Chronicle”, preserved only in Ethiopic version, contains many valuable testimonies on Egypt during the Arab conquest (640–643). The author examines the sources of John of Nikiu, trying to answer from whom John borrowed his evidence on the Moors who served in army of Byzantine Emperor Heraclius (610–641). Based on this subject, the author is looking over a historiography tradition that John followed when describing the way of life and tribal organization of the Moors who lived west of the Nile Delta. Having compared the evidence of John of Nikiu and John of Antioch, a unique Greek-speaking author living in the 7th century and mentioned the presence of the Moors within Heraclius’ army, the author concludes that John of Nikiu used the testimonies of the prominent Byzantine 6th-century historian Procopius of Caesarea, an eyewitness to the reign of Emperor Justinian I (527–565). John of Nikiu read Procopius’ works, as he himself strictly says, and, respectively, thanks to Procopius, John knew well about the tribal behaviour and political structures of the Moors. According to the author, Procopius influenced John not only in subjects, but also in emotions: like Procopius, John of Nikiu declared a sharp negative assessment of the Moors’ behaviour and tribal life. The Coptic chronicler constantly labeled them as barbarians.","PeriodicalId":41257,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-2-5-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper deals with a rather rare and little-studied text – the “Chronicle” of John of Nikiu, a Coptic chronicler who lived in Egypt in the second half of the 7th century and headed the bishopric in the city of Nikiu. The “Chronicle”, preserved only in Ethiopic version, contains many valuable testimonies on Egypt during the Arab conquest (640–643). The author examines the sources of John of Nikiu, trying to answer from whom John borrowed his evidence on the Moors who served in army of Byzantine Emperor Heraclius (610–641). Based on this subject, the author is looking over a historiography tradition that John followed when describing the way of life and tribal organization of the Moors who lived west of the Nile Delta. Having compared the evidence of John of Nikiu and John of Antioch, a unique Greek-speaking author living in the 7th century and mentioned the presence of the Moors within Heraclius’ army, the author concludes that John of Nikiu used the testimonies of the prominent Byzantine 6th-century historian Procopius of Caesarea, an eyewitness to the reign of Emperor Justinian I (527–565). John of Nikiu read Procopius’ works, as he himself strictly says, and, respectively, thanks to Procopius, John knew well about the tribal behaviour and political structures of the Moors. According to the author, Procopius influenced John not only in subjects, but also in emotions: like Procopius, John of Nikiu declared a sharp negative assessment of the Moors’ behaviour and tribal life. The Coptic chronicler constantly labeled them as barbarians.
摩尔人和拜占庭皇帝希拉克略(公元610-641年),由尼基乌的约翰编年史:一个来源研究的角度
这篇论文涉及的是一个相当罕见且研究很少的文本——尼基乌约翰的《编年史》,他是一位科普特编年史家,生活在7世纪下半叶的埃及,是尼基乌市的主教。仅保存在埃塞俄比亚版本的“编年史”包含了许多关于阿拉伯征服期间(640-643)埃及的宝贵证词。作者考察了尼基乌的约翰的资料来源,试图回答约翰从谁那里借用了拜占庭皇帝希拉克略(610-641)军队中服役的摩尔人的证据。基于这一主题,作者回顾了约翰在描述生活在尼罗河三角洲西部的摩尔人的生活方式和部落组织时所遵循的历史编纂传统。在比较了尼基乌的约翰和安提阿的约翰的证据后,作者得出结论,尼基乌的约翰使用了6世纪著名的拜占庭历史学家普罗科皮乌斯的证词,他是查士丁尼一世(527-565)统治时期的目击者。约翰是一位生活在7世纪的独特的希腊语作家,并提到了摩尔人在赫拉克利乌斯的军队中的存在。尼基的约翰读了普罗科匹厄斯的著作,正如他自己严格所说的那样,多亏了普罗科匹厄斯,约翰对摩尔人的部落行为和政治结构有了深入的了解。根据作者的说法,普罗科匹厄斯不仅在学科上影响了约翰,而且在情感上也影响了约翰:像普罗科匹厄斯一样,尼基的约翰对摩尔人的行为和部落生活发表了尖锐的负面评价。科普特编年史家不断给他们贴上野蛮人的标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信