Matching Typology of innovations to different emerging business situations

Q3 Decision Sciences
None Okanga Boniface
{"title":"Matching Typology of innovations to different emerging business situations","authors":"None Okanga Boniface","doi":"10.26524/jms.13.24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Matching product, process or strategy innovation strategies to the emerging exogenous or endogenous business situations minimises a firm’s vulnerability in the wake of the increasingly more precarious business world. However, it is often the mismatch between such strategies which is often a major hurdle of most of the contemporary businesses. To address such innovation strategy mismatches, it is argued in this conceptual paper that it is not only synchronisation of product innovation with relevant process and strategy innovation strategies that would leverage a firm’s superior market performance, but also matching relevant product, process and strategy innovation strategies to the diagnosed exogenous and endogenous business situations. In exogenous business situations characterised by intense industry rivalries or market saturation, the application of a combination of product and strategy innovation strategies would enable a business avoid vulnerability to the increasing spate of destructive rivalries by creating new products to tape opportunities in new markets and render irrelevant the competition in the existing markets. However, in cases of frequent sporadic destructive competitors’ actions causing proliferation of enormous disruptive innovations, the use of a combination of product, process and strategy innovation strategies would enable a business create superior value offerings in conjunction with gaming-motivated cooperation and strategic alliances with rivals to recreate the existing industry conditions and circumstances to its advantages. That contrasts with the circumstances where a business is experiencing significant shifts in customer tastes and preferences. In such situations, the use of product and strategy innovation strategies would integrate new value offerings in the existing products to reverse the shifts in customer tastes and preferences. However, in endogenous situations, quests for growth would require the use of a combination of product, process and strategy innovation strategies as contrasted with cases of quests for costs’ minimisation where only the use of process and strategy innovation strategies would be required. It also contrasts with differentiation quests where only product and process innovation strategies would be critical for aiding a firm to achieve its business credo.","PeriodicalId":37730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Information and Decision Science","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Information and Decision Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26524/jms.13.24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Matching product, process or strategy innovation strategies to the emerging exogenous or endogenous business situations minimises a firm’s vulnerability in the wake of the increasingly more precarious business world. However, it is often the mismatch between such strategies which is often a major hurdle of most of the contemporary businesses. To address such innovation strategy mismatches, it is argued in this conceptual paper that it is not only synchronisation of product innovation with relevant process and strategy innovation strategies that would leverage a firm’s superior market performance, but also matching relevant product, process and strategy innovation strategies to the diagnosed exogenous and endogenous business situations. In exogenous business situations characterised by intense industry rivalries or market saturation, the application of a combination of product and strategy innovation strategies would enable a business avoid vulnerability to the increasing spate of destructive rivalries by creating new products to tape opportunities in new markets and render irrelevant the competition in the existing markets. However, in cases of frequent sporadic destructive competitors’ actions causing proliferation of enormous disruptive innovations, the use of a combination of product, process and strategy innovation strategies would enable a business create superior value offerings in conjunction with gaming-motivated cooperation and strategic alliances with rivals to recreate the existing industry conditions and circumstances to its advantages. That contrasts with the circumstances where a business is experiencing significant shifts in customer tastes and preferences. In such situations, the use of product and strategy innovation strategies would integrate new value offerings in the existing products to reverse the shifts in customer tastes and preferences. However, in endogenous situations, quests for growth would require the use of a combination of product, process and strategy innovation strategies as contrasted with cases of quests for costs’ minimisation where only the use of process and strategy innovation strategies would be required. It also contrasts with differentiation quests where only product and process innovation strategies would be critical for aiding a firm to achieve its business credo.
将创新类型与不同的新兴业务情况相匹配
将产品、流程或战略创新策略与新兴的外生或内生商业环境相匹配,可以最大限度地减少企业在日益不稳定的商业世界中的脆弱性。然而,这两种策略之间的不匹配往往是大多数当代企业的主要障碍。为了解决这种创新战略错配问题,本文认为,不仅产品创新与相关流程和战略创新战略的同步能够利用企业的卓越市场绩效,而且还需要将相关产品、流程和战略创新战略与诊断出的外生和内生业务状况相匹配。在以激烈的行业竞争或市场饱和为特征的外生业务情况下,产品和战略创新战略相结合的应用将通过创造新产品来抓住新市场的机会,使现有市场的竞争变得无关紧要,从而使企业避免容易受到日益增加的破坏性竞争的影响。然而,在频繁的零星破坏性竞争对手的行为导致巨大的破坏性创新扩散的情况下,结合使用产品,流程和战略创新策略,将使企业能够创造卓越的价值产品,并与竞争对手进行博弈驱动的合作和战略联盟,以重新创造现有的行业条件和环境,使其具有优势。这与企业正在经历客户品味和偏好的重大变化的情况形成鲜明对比。在这种情况下,使用产品和战略创新策略将在现有产品中整合新的价值提供,以扭转客户品味和偏好的变化。然而,在内生的情况下,追求增长将需要使用产品、流程和战略创新战略的组合,而在追求成本最小化的情况下,只需要使用流程和战略创新战略。它也与差异化任务形成对比,在差异化任务中,只有产品和流程创新战略对帮助公司实现其商业信条至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Management Information and Decision Science
Journal of Management Information and Decision Science Decision Sciences-Information Systems and Management
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences (JMIDS) is a reputed open access journal affiliated to Allied Business Academies. The journal focuses on disseminating the latest research in the field of management information system and its role in decision making, as well their relationships to cognate disciplines including Economics, Finance, Management, Management Science, Marketing, Statistics, Operations Research and Engineering. The journal adheres to stringent double blind peer review policy to maintain the publication quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信