From the breakdown of psychiatry during nazism and the Nuremberg Code, to the materialist neuropsychological model in contemporary science and society: A bioethical analysis

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Francisco López-Muñoz, Francisco Pérez-Fernández
{"title":"From the breakdown of psychiatry during nazism and the Nuremberg Code, to the materialist neuropsychological model in contemporary science and society: A bioethical analysis","authors":"Francisco López-Muñoz, Francisco Pérez-Fernández","doi":"10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2023.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The breakdown of German psychiatry with the coming to power of the National Socialist regime in 1933 resulted in a revival after the war of bioethical issues, the immediate effect of which was the enactment of the Nuremberg Code. In many ways, this breakdown was the result of the historical evolution of psychomedical knowledge and the mass dissemination of reductionist discourses and ideas that created a breeding ground for tragedy. The cyclical discourse of psychic materialism, which has been repeated for centuries in the history of science in different formulations, can, if not properly interpreted, lead to far-reaching appropriations and risks, to which due attention must be paid. The latest manifestation of this issue, the view of mental life as basically cerebral, neurological, biochemical, and determinist, a view that has not been managed or presented adequately to the public, could become the basis for perverse new perspectives and applications in the current context of research and academic activity.","PeriodicalId":46510,"journal":{"name":"Salud Mental","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Salud Mental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17711/sm.0185-3325.2023.028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The breakdown of German psychiatry with the coming to power of the National Socialist regime in 1933 resulted in a revival after the war of bioethical issues, the immediate effect of which was the enactment of the Nuremberg Code. In many ways, this breakdown was the result of the historical evolution of psychomedical knowledge and the mass dissemination of reductionist discourses and ideas that created a breeding ground for tragedy. The cyclical discourse of psychic materialism, which has been repeated for centuries in the history of science in different formulations, can, if not properly interpreted, lead to far-reaching appropriations and risks, to which due attention must be paid. The latest manifestation of this issue, the view of mental life as basically cerebral, neurological, biochemical, and determinist, a view that has not been managed or presented adequately to the public, could become the basis for perverse new perspectives and applications in the current context of research and academic activity.
从纳粹主义和纽伦堡法典期间精神病学的崩溃,到当代科学和社会中的唯物主义神经心理学模型:生物伦理分析
1933年国家社会主义政权上台后,德国精神病学的崩溃导致了战后生物伦理问题的复兴,其直接影响是《纽伦堡法典》的颁布。在许多方面,这种崩溃是精神医学知识的历史演变和还原论话语和思想的大规模传播的结果,这些话语和思想为悲剧创造了温床。心灵唯物主义的循环话语,在科学史上以不同的形式重复了几个世纪,如果不能正确解释,可能会导致深远的挪用和风险,对此必须给予应有的关注。这个问题的最新表现是,精神生活基本上是大脑的、神经的、生化的和决定论的,这一观点没有得到充分的管理或向公众展示,可能成为当前研究和学术活动背景下反常的新观点和应用的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Salud Mental
Salud Mental PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Salud Mental receives original manuscripts dealing with various mental health-related topics (such as psychiatry, neurosciences, psychology, epidemiology, and addictions). The submission of a manuscript must be exclusively carried out through this website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信