Exploring the Impact of Training Methods on Repeated Sprints in Hypoxia Training Effects

Daniel Rojas-Valverde, Aldo A. Vasquez-Bonilla, Rafael Timón, Joan M. Feliu-Ilvonen, Ismael Martínez-Guardado, Guillermo Olcina
{"title":"Exploring the Impact of Training Methods on Repeated Sprints in Hypoxia Training Effects","authors":"Daniel Rojas-Valverde, Aldo A. Vasquez-Bonilla, Rafael Timón, Joan M. Feliu-Ilvonen, Ismael Martínez-Guardado, Guillermo Olcina","doi":"10.3390/oxygen3030023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Emerging evidence suggests that the outcomes of hypoxia training may be influenced by various factors, contingent upon the chosen method, such as chamber, tent, or mask. This study aimed to examine how different training methods influence the effects of Repeated Sprints in Hypoxia (RSH) training. Methods: Sixteen well-trained cyclists were divided into two groups, experimental (tent; n = 8) and control (mask; n = 8), and carried out eight RSH sessions for four weeks. Training sessions consisted of three bouts of high-intensity sprints using a cycle ergometer. The indoor ambient conditions (CO2, temperature, and humidity), performance variables (power and relative power output), arterial oxygen saturation, local muscle oxygen of vastus lateralis, heart rate, core temperature, and physiological variables (perception of effort) were measured in each training session. Results: The experimental group reported significantly higher CO2 (p < 0.001 ES = 0.784), humidity levels (p < 0.001 ES = 0.750), thermal discomfort (p = 0.003 ES = 0.266), dehydration (p 0.025 ES = 0.097), heart rate (p = 0.017 ES = 0.113), and lower muscle oxygen amplification (p = 0.002 ES = 0.181) than the control group. Conclusion: According to the responses observed, interval training performed under hypoxic conditions inside a chamber induces a more severe physiological response.","PeriodicalId":74387,"journal":{"name":"Oxygen (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxygen (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/oxygen3030023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emerging evidence suggests that the outcomes of hypoxia training may be influenced by various factors, contingent upon the chosen method, such as chamber, tent, or mask. This study aimed to examine how different training methods influence the effects of Repeated Sprints in Hypoxia (RSH) training. Methods: Sixteen well-trained cyclists were divided into two groups, experimental (tent; n = 8) and control (mask; n = 8), and carried out eight RSH sessions for four weeks. Training sessions consisted of three bouts of high-intensity sprints using a cycle ergometer. The indoor ambient conditions (CO2, temperature, and humidity), performance variables (power and relative power output), arterial oxygen saturation, local muscle oxygen of vastus lateralis, heart rate, core temperature, and physiological variables (perception of effort) were measured in each training session. Results: The experimental group reported significantly higher CO2 (p < 0.001 ES = 0.784), humidity levels (p < 0.001 ES = 0.750), thermal discomfort (p = 0.003 ES = 0.266), dehydration (p 0.025 ES = 0.097), heart rate (p = 0.017 ES = 0.113), and lower muscle oxygen amplification (p = 0.002 ES = 0.181) than the control group. Conclusion: According to the responses observed, interval training performed under hypoxic conditions inside a chamber induces a more severe physiological response.
探讨缺氧训练中重复冲刺训练方式对训练效果的影响
背景:新出现的证据表明,缺氧训练的结果可能受到各种因素的影响,取决于所选择的方法,如室内、帐篷或面罩。本研究旨在研究不同的训练方法如何影响在低氧(RSH)训练中重复冲刺的效果。方法:16名训练有素的自行车运动员分为两组,实验组(帐篷组;N = 8)和对照组(口罩;n = 8),并进行8次RSH疗程,为期四周。训练包括三次高强度的冲刺,使用自行车计力器。在每次训练中测量室内环境条件(CO2、温度和湿度)、性能变量(功率和相对功率输出)、动脉血氧饱和度、股外侧局部肌氧、心率、核心温度和生理变量(努力感)。结果:实验组的CO2 (p <0.001 ES = 0.784),湿度水平(p <0.001 ES = 0.750)、热不适(p = 0.003 ES = 0.266)、脱水(p = 0.025 ES = 0.097)、心率(p = 0.017 ES = 0.113)、肌氧扩增(p = 0.002 ES = 0.181)均低于对照组。结论:根据观察到的反应,在室内低氧条件下进行间歇训练会引起更严重的生理反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信