An Analysis of Cohesive Devices on Phoenix Posts on The Death of Queen Elisabeth II

Peniel Zaazra Nouhou, Ngonjo Victor Fuh
{"title":"An Analysis of Cohesive Devices on Phoenix Posts on The Death of Queen Elisabeth II","authors":"Peniel Zaazra Nouhou, Ngonjo Victor Fuh","doi":"10.25077/ar.10.3.210-220.2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores some cohesive devices namely reference, repetition, and collocation on Phoenix messages by internet users worldwide in reaction to the death of Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. 400 e-messages on Phoenix platform were collected from 175 informants. Each participant provided at most three e-messages. The study examines the types of cohesive devices and the extent to which they are used in the various conversations of the texters. Insights were drawn from Halliday and Hassan (1976) who laid down the foundation of cohesion theory in English. They identified two different types of cohesive devices namely grammatical and lexical cohesion. The grammatical type is made up of reference, conjunction, substitution, and ellipsis; while lexical one comprises reiteration and collocation. Facts from the analysis of the data revealed that reference was the dominant cohesive devices. More precisely, the demonstrative pronouns (28.57%) are the most used referential items. it is seconded by possessive pronouns (23.42%) and the least employed devices is personal pronouns (20.57%). The results also indicated the use of repetition and collocation in messages of the participants. The most repeated word is Queen while the least reduplicated one is slave/slavery. Items of collocation are used at varying frequencies.","PeriodicalId":56218,"journal":{"name":"Arbitrer","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arbitrer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.10.3.210-220.2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores some cohesive devices namely reference, repetition, and collocation on Phoenix messages by internet users worldwide in reaction to the death of Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom. 400 e-messages on Phoenix platform were collected from 175 informants. Each participant provided at most three e-messages. The study examines the types of cohesive devices and the extent to which they are used in the various conversations of the texters. Insights were drawn from Halliday and Hassan (1976) who laid down the foundation of cohesion theory in English. They identified two different types of cohesive devices namely grammatical and lexical cohesion. The grammatical type is made up of reference, conjunction, substitution, and ellipsis; while lexical one comprises reiteration and collocation. Facts from the analysis of the data revealed that reference was the dominant cohesive devices. More precisely, the demonstrative pronouns (28.57%) are the most used referential items. it is seconded by possessive pronouns (23.42%) and the least employed devices is personal pronouns (20.57%). The results also indicated the use of repetition and collocation in messages of the participants. The most repeated word is Queen while the least reduplicated one is slave/slavery. Items of collocation are used at varying frequencies.
英国女王伊丽莎白二世去世时凤凰贴的衔接手段分析
本研究从全球网民对英国女王伊丽莎白二世去世的回应中,通过凤凰平台收集175个信息者的400封电子邮件,探讨了凤凰平台上网民留言中的一些衔接手段,即引用、重复和搭配。每位与会者最多提供三条电子邮件。该研究考察了衔接手段的类型以及它们在短信发送者的各种对话中使用的程度。韩礼德和哈桑(1976)的见解为英语衔接理论奠定了基础。他们确定了两种不同类型的衔接手段,即语法衔接和词汇衔接。语法类型由指称、连词、替代和省略构成;而词汇方面则包括重复和搭配。从数据分析的事实来看,指称是主要的衔接手段。更确切地说,指示代词(28.57%)是使用最多的指称词。其次是所有格代词(23.42%),使用最少的人称代词(20.57%)。结果还显示了参与者在信息中使用重复和搭配的情况。重复次数最多的单词是Queen,而重复次数最少的单词是slave/奴隶制。搭配项以不同的频率使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信