Practical Applications of The Hunt for Alpha in ESG Fixed Income: Fund Evidence from around the World

Inna Zorina, Lux Corlett-Roy
{"title":"Practical Applications of The Hunt for Alpha in ESG Fixed Income: Fund Evidence from around the World","authors":"Inna Zorina, Lux Corlett-Roy","doi":"10.3905/pa.2023.pa555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In <ext-link><bold><italic>The Hunt for Alpha in ESG Fixed Income: Fund Evidence from around the World</italic></bold></ext-link>, from the Fall 2022 issue of <bold><italic>The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing</italic></bold>, authors <bold>Inna Zorina</bold>, of <bold>Vanguard</bold>, and <bold>Lux Corlett-Roy</bold>, formerly of <bold>Vanguard</bold>, find that environmental, social, and governance (ESG) fixed-income funds have not consistently outperformed the bond market, after controlling for well-established fixed-income factors. Recent years have seen a rapid rise in assets under management by investment funds that take into account ESG considerations in asset allocation decisions. It is therefore important to understand whether reallocating assets to ESG funds is likely to create alpha (meaning outperformance of the market average) or otherwise affect portfolio returns. The study finds that ESG fund returns are driven by their exposure to credit default risk and term until bond maturity, just like non-ESG funds. Higher-risk and longer-term funds have higher average returns, while ESG funds with higher expense ratios outperform the market less frequently than those with lower expense ratios. Given the lack of consistent alpha and the fact that bondholders do not have shareholder voting rights like those of stockholders, ESG fixed-income funds may or may not align with the goals of impact-investing clients.","PeriodicalId":500434,"journal":{"name":"Practical applications of institutional investor journals","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical applications of institutional investor journals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/pa.2023.pa555","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In The Hunt for Alpha in ESG Fixed Income: Fund Evidence from around the World, from the Fall 2022 issue of The Journal of Impact and ESG Investing, authors Inna Zorina, of Vanguard, and Lux Corlett-Roy, formerly of Vanguard, find that environmental, social, and governance (ESG) fixed-income funds have not consistently outperformed the bond market, after controlling for well-established fixed-income factors. Recent years have seen a rapid rise in assets under management by investment funds that take into account ESG considerations in asset allocation decisions. It is therefore important to understand whether reallocating assets to ESG funds is likely to create alpha (meaning outperformance of the market average) or otherwise affect portfolio returns. The study finds that ESG fund returns are driven by their exposure to credit default risk and term until bond maturity, just like non-ESG funds. Higher-risk and longer-term funds have higher average returns, while ESG funds with higher expense ratios outperform the market less frequently than those with lower expense ratios. Given the lack of consistent alpha and the fact that bondholders do not have shareholder voting rights like those of stockholders, ESG fixed-income funds may or may not align with the goals of impact-investing clients.
寻找阿尔法在ESG固定收益中的实际应用:来自世界各地的基金证据
在《影响与ESG投资杂志》2022年秋季刊的《在ESG固定收益中寻找阿尔法:来自世界各地的基金证据》一文中,先锋集团的Inna Zorina和前先锋集团的Lux Corlett-Roy发现,在控制了成熟的固定收益因素后,环境、社会和治理(ESG)固定收益基金并没有一直跑赢债券市场。近年来,在资产配置决策中考虑到ESG因素的投资基金管理的资产迅速增加。因此,了解将资产重新配置到ESG基金是否可能产生alpha(意味着优于市场平均水平)或以其他方式影响投资组合回报是很重要的。研究发现,与非ESG基金一样,ESG基金的回报受到其信用违约风险敞口和债券到期日期限的驱动。高风险和长期基金的平均回报率更高,而费用比率较高的ESG基金跑赢市场的频率低于费用比率较低的ESG基金。由于缺乏一致的alpha,而且债券持有人不像股东那样拥有股东投票权,ESG固定收益基金可能与影响投资客户的目标一致,也可能不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信