Prehospital Time Intervals in Thailand during COVID-19

Patiman Chanrak, Kanthika Kraisawat
{"title":"Prehospital Time Intervals in Thailand during COVID-19","authors":"Patiman Chanrak, Kanthika Kraisawat","doi":"10.31584/jhsmr.20231013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine the effect of the coronavirus disease, 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the prehospital time intervals of emergency medical services (EMS) in Thailand. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the prehospital time intervals of EMS in Thailand; from January 1, 2019 to September 30, 2021 using data obtained from the national EMS database. Patients with incomplete medical records, prehospital time intervals <1 or >300 minutes, and those admitted between January 1 and March 31, 2020 were excluded. Data were compared between the following groups: Group 1, pre-COVID-19; Group 2, first- and second-wave of COVID-19; and Group 3, third-wave of COVID-19: Kruskal–Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and chi-square tests were used. Results: A total of 3,863,153 patients were enrolled into this study. The median total prehospital time was significantly longer in Group 2 when compared to Group 1, [25 (17,34) vs. 24 (17,33) minutes, p-value<0.001]; longer on-scene time, [4 (2,7) vs. 3 (2,6) minutes, p-value<0.001]; shorter transportation time, [10 (6,17) vs. 11 (6,18) minutes, p-value<0.001]. The median total prehospital time [27 (19,37) vs. 25 (17,34) minutes, p-value<0.001], response time [8 (5,14) vs. 7 (4,11) minutes, p-value<0.001], and transportation time were significantly longer in Group 3 than in Group 2 [11 (6,18) vs. 10 (6,17) minutes, p-value<0.001]. Conclusion: The EMS prehospital time intervals in Thailand during COVID-19 were significantly longer in both the non-trauma and trauma subgroups. Appropriate pre-hospital strategies and monitoring should be developed to manage future pandemics.","PeriodicalId":93205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)","volume":"51 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20231013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effect of the coronavirus disease, 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the prehospital time intervals of emergency medical services (EMS) in Thailand. Material and Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the prehospital time intervals of EMS in Thailand; from January 1, 2019 to September 30, 2021 using data obtained from the national EMS database. Patients with incomplete medical records, prehospital time intervals <1 or >300 minutes, and those admitted between January 1 and March 31, 2020 were excluded. Data were compared between the following groups: Group 1, pre-COVID-19; Group 2, first- and second-wave of COVID-19; and Group 3, third-wave of COVID-19: Kruskal–Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and chi-square tests were used. Results: A total of 3,863,153 patients were enrolled into this study. The median total prehospital time was significantly longer in Group 2 when compared to Group 1, [25 (17,34) vs. 24 (17,33) minutes, p-value<0.001]; longer on-scene time, [4 (2,7) vs. 3 (2,6) minutes, p-value<0.001]; shorter transportation time, [10 (6,17) vs. 11 (6,18) minutes, p-value<0.001]. The median total prehospital time [27 (19,37) vs. 25 (17,34) minutes, p-value<0.001], response time [8 (5,14) vs. 7 (4,11) minutes, p-value<0.001], and transportation time were significantly longer in Group 3 than in Group 2 [11 (6,18) vs. 10 (6,17) minutes, p-value<0.001]. Conclusion: The EMS prehospital time intervals in Thailand during COVID-19 were significantly longer in both the non-trauma and trauma subgroups. Appropriate pre-hospital strategies and monitoring should be developed to manage future pandemics.
2019冠状病毒病期间泰国院前时间间隔
目的:了解2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对泰国急诊医疗服务院前时间间隔的影响。材料和方法:本回顾性队列研究分析了泰国EMS的院前时间间隔;从2019年1月1日至2021年9月30日,使用从国家EMS数据库获取的数据。排除病历不完整、院前时间间隔1 ~ 300分钟、2020年1月1日~ 3月31日住院的患者。比较以下两组数据:第一组,未感染covid -19;第2组,第一波和第二波COVID-19;第3组,第三波COVID-19:采用Kruskal-Wallis、Wilcoxon秩和和卡方检验。结果:共有3,863,153例患者入组。与1组相比,2组的院前总中位数时间明显更长,[25(17,34)比24(17,33)分钟,p值<0.001];更长的现场时间,[4 (2,7)vs. 3(2,6)分钟,p值<0.001];运输时间更短,[10 (6,17)vs. 11(6,18)分钟,p值<0.001]。院前总时间中位数[27 (19,37)vs. 25 (17,34) min, p值<0.001]、反应时间[8 (5,14)vs. 7 (4,11) min, p值<0.001]、转运时间中位数3组明显大于2组[11 (6,18)vs. 10 (6,17) min, p值<0.001]。结论:在泰国,非创伤亚组和创伤亚组在COVID-19期间的EMS院前时间间隔均显着延长。应制定适当的院前战略和监测,以管理未来的大流行病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信