Survey Recruitment Bias and Estimates of College Student Food Insecurity

IF 1.2 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Victoria Venable, Mark Edwards, Jennifer A. Jackson
{"title":"Survey Recruitment Bias and Estimates of College Student Food Insecurity","authors":"Victoria Venable, Mark Edwards, Jennifer A. Jackson","doi":"10.1080/19320248.2023.2276689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTHaving valid measures of college student FI is essential for justifying basic-needs services for students. But college student food insecurity (FI) rates vary significantly across institutions, perhaps partially due to differences in non-response bias resulting from participant recruitment strategies. We tested for effects of recruitment method on measured levels of college student FI at three time points (2020, 2021, 2022). Survey response rates varied dramatically across recruitment modalities. Higher FI rates were estimated in low-response-rate survey deliveries. Emailed surveys appear to inflate estimates of student FI. Efforts to increase response rates likely produce more valid estimates of college student FI.KEYWORDS: College food insecuritysample biasresponse biassurvey recruitment AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank the students who participated in this study, the Office of the Dean of Students for authorization to conduct the survey on campus and for funding student and faculty researchers.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis project was funded by the Office of the Dean of Students at the “Main Campus”.","PeriodicalId":51621,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition","volume":"53 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19320248.2023.2276689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTHaving valid measures of college student FI is essential for justifying basic-needs services for students. But college student food insecurity (FI) rates vary significantly across institutions, perhaps partially due to differences in non-response bias resulting from participant recruitment strategies. We tested for effects of recruitment method on measured levels of college student FI at three time points (2020, 2021, 2022). Survey response rates varied dramatically across recruitment modalities. Higher FI rates were estimated in low-response-rate survey deliveries. Emailed surveys appear to inflate estimates of student FI. Efforts to increase response rates likely produce more valid estimates of college student FI.KEYWORDS: College food insecuritysample biasresponse biassurvey recruitment AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank the students who participated in this study, the Office of the Dean of Students for authorization to conduct the survey on campus and for funding student and faculty researchers.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationFundingThis project was funded by the Office of the Dean of Students at the “Main Campus”.
大学生食物不安全的调查、招聘偏见和估计
摘要掌握有效的大学生基本需求测量方法,是合理开展大学生基本需求服务的重要依据。但不同院校的大学生食物不安全(FI)率差异很大,部分原因可能是参与者招聘策略导致的非反应性偏见的差异。我们在三个时间点(2020年、2021年、2022年)测试了招聘方法对大学生FI测量水平的影响。不同招聘方式的调查回复率差异很大。在低回复率的调查交付中估计有较高的FI率。电子邮件调查似乎夸大了对学生FI的估计。努力提高回复率可能产生更有效的估计大学生FI。关键词:大学食品不安全样本偏差响应偏差调查招募致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢致谢披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本项目由“主校区”学生主任办公室资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition
Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
69
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信