The Influence of Guided Inquiry, Discovery Learning Models and Learning Styles on Learning Outcomes

Sri Endang Lestari, Hasruddin Hasruddin, Zulkifli Matondang
{"title":"The Influence of Guided Inquiry, Discovery Learning Models and Learning Styles on Learning Outcomes","authors":"Sri Endang Lestari, Hasruddin Hasruddin, Zulkifli Matondang","doi":"10.47175/rielsj.v4i3.795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was conducted with three objectives, namely: 1) to determine the difference in the influence of guided inquiry learning model and discovery model on student’s learning outcomes in science subjects on the human excretory system in class VIII of SMP Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan ; 2) to determine the difference in the influence of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles on student’s learning outcomes in science subjects on the human excretory system in class VIII of SMP Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan ; and 3) to determine the interaction between the two learning models and learning styles in influencing student’s learning outcomes in science subjects on the human excretory system in class VIII of SMP Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan. The approach used in this study was a quantitative approach with a nonequivalent pretest-posttest group design with a 2x3 factorial treatment level. The research sample consisted of all students in class VIII1, totaling 28 students, and class VIII4, totaling 30 students, with the sampling technique using Cluster Random Sampling. The results of the study indicate that, firstly, students who were taught using the guided inquiry learning model performed better or excelled compared to students taught using the discovery learning model. Secondly, students who were taught using the visual learning style performed better or excelled compared to students taught using the auditory or kinesthetic learning styles. Thirdly, there is an interaction between the two learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes in science subjects on the human excretory system.","PeriodicalId":475761,"journal":{"name":"Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Randwick International of Education and Linguistics Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47175/rielsj.v4i3.795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was conducted with three objectives, namely: 1) to determine the difference in the influence of guided inquiry learning model and discovery model on student’s learning outcomes in science subjects on the human excretory system in class VIII of SMP Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan ; 2) to determine the difference in the influence of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles on student’s learning outcomes in science subjects on the human excretory system in class VIII of SMP Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan ; and 3) to determine the interaction between the two learning models and learning styles in influencing student’s learning outcomes in science subjects on the human excretory system in class VIII of SMP Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan. The approach used in this study was a quantitative approach with a nonequivalent pretest-posttest group design with a 2x3 factorial treatment level. The research sample consisted of all students in class VIII1, totaling 28 students, and class VIII4, totaling 30 students, with the sampling technique using Cluster Random Sampling. The results of the study indicate that, firstly, students who were taught using the guided inquiry learning model performed better or excelled compared to students taught using the discovery learning model. Secondly, students who were taught using the visual learning style performed better or excelled compared to students taught using the auditory or kinesthetic learning styles. Thirdly, there is an interaction between the two learning models and learning styles on students' learning outcomes in science subjects on the human excretory system.
引导式探究、发现式学习模式和学习风格对学习成果的影响
本研究有三个目的,即:1)确定引导探究学习模式和发现学习模式对学生在科学科目中学习成果的影响对SMP Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan VIII班人体排泄系统的影响差异;2)探讨视觉、听觉和动觉学习风格对学生科学科目学习成果的影响差异,以及对SMP Negeri 1 Kualuh Selatan八级人体排泄系统的影响;3)探讨两种学习模式和学习风格对学生在科学科目中排泄系统学习效果的影响。本研究中使用的方法是定量方法,采用非等效前测后测组设计,采用2x3析因处理水平。研究样本为VIII1班28名学生和VIII4班30名学生,采用整群随机抽样的抽样方法。研究结果表明,首先,与使用发现学习模式的学生相比,使用指导性探究学习模式的学生表现更好或更出色。其次,与使用听觉或动觉学习风格的学生相比,使用视觉学习风格的学生表现更好或更出色。第三,两种学习模式和学习方式对学生在人体排泄系统理科科目的学习成果存在交互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书