Clinical application of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation: A scoping review

Pub Date : 2023-09-30 DOI:10.1142/s1013702524500033
Anwar Hassan, Sidney Takacs, Sam Orde, Jennifer A. Alison, Stephen Huang, Maree A. Milross
{"title":"Clinical application of intrapulmonary percussive ventilation: A scoping review","authors":"Anwar Hassan, Sidney Takacs, Sam Orde, Jennifer A. Alison, Stephen Huang, Maree A. Milross","doi":"10.1142/s1013702524500033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Impaired respiratory function secondary to acute or chronic respiratory disease poses a significant clinical and healthcare burden. Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) is used in various clinical settings to treat excessive airway secretions, pulmonary atelectasis, and impaired gas exchange. Despite IPV’s wide use, there is a lack of clinical guidance on IPV application which may lead to inconsistency in clinical practice. This scoping review aimed to summarise the clinical application methods and dosage of IPV used by clinicians and researchers to provide guidance. A two-staged systematic search was conducted to retrieve studies that used IPV in inpatient and outpatient settings. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google scholar were searched from January 1979 till 2022. Studies with patients aged ≥16 years and published in any language were included. Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract, reviewed full text articles, and extracted data. Search yielded 514 studies. After removing duplicates and irrelevant studies, 25 studies with 905 participants met the inclusion criteria. This is the first scoping review to summarise IPV application methods and dosages from the available studies in intensive care unit (ICU), acute inpatient (non-ICU), and outpatient settings. Some variations in clinical applications and prescribed dosages of IPV were noted. Despite variations, common trends in clinical application and prescription of IPV dosages were observed and summarised to assist clinicians with IPV intervention. Although an evidence-based clinical guideline could not be provided, this review provides detailed information on IPV application and dosages in order to provide clinical guidance and lays a foundation towards developing a clinical practice guideline in the future.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s1013702524500033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impaired respiratory function secondary to acute or chronic respiratory disease poses a significant clinical and healthcare burden. Intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (IPV) is used in various clinical settings to treat excessive airway secretions, pulmonary atelectasis, and impaired gas exchange. Despite IPV’s wide use, there is a lack of clinical guidance on IPV application which may lead to inconsistency in clinical practice. This scoping review aimed to summarise the clinical application methods and dosage of IPV used by clinicians and researchers to provide guidance. A two-staged systematic search was conducted to retrieve studies that used IPV in inpatient and outpatient settings. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Google scholar were searched from January 1979 till 2022. Studies with patients aged ≥16 years and published in any language were included. Two reviewers independently screened the title and abstract, reviewed full text articles, and extracted data. Search yielded 514 studies. After removing duplicates and irrelevant studies, 25 studies with 905 participants met the inclusion criteria. This is the first scoping review to summarise IPV application methods and dosages from the available studies in intensive care unit (ICU), acute inpatient (non-ICU), and outpatient settings. Some variations in clinical applications and prescribed dosages of IPV were noted. Despite variations, common trends in clinical application and prescription of IPV dosages were observed and summarised to assist clinicians with IPV intervention. Although an evidence-based clinical guideline could not be provided, this review provides detailed information on IPV application and dosages in order to provide clinical guidance and lays a foundation towards developing a clinical practice guideline in the future.
分享
查看原文
肺内冲击通气的临床应用:范围综述
急性或慢性呼吸系统疾病继发的呼吸功能受损造成了重大的临床和医疗负担。肺内冲击通气(IPV)在各种临床环境中用于治疗气道分泌物过多,肺不张和气体交换受损。虽然IPV应用广泛,但临床对IPV的应用缺乏指导,这可能导致临床实践中的不一致。本综述旨在总结临床医生和研究人员使用的IPV的临床应用方法和剂量,以提供指导。进行了两阶段的系统检索,以检索在住院和门诊环境中使用IPV的研究。检索时间为1979年1月至2022年1月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、Scopus和谷歌scholar。纳入患者年龄≥16岁且以任何语言发表的研究。两位审稿人独立筛选标题和摘要,审阅全文文章,并提取数据。搜索产生了514项研究。在剔除重复和不相关的研究后,有25项研究905名受试者符合纳入标准。这是第一次从重症监护室(ICU)、急性住院(非ICU)和门诊环境中总结IPV应用方法和剂量的范围综述。注意到IPV在临床应用和处方剂量方面的一些变化。尽管存在差异,但观察和总结了IPV临床应用和处方剂量的共同趋势,以协助临床医生进行IPV干预。虽然无法提供循证临床指南,但本文提供了IPV应用和剂量的详细信息,为今后制定临床实践指南奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信