Perbandingan Ketentuan Pidana Legislasi Nasional Negara Sponsor Eksplorasi Deep-seabed Mining Pada International Seabed Authority : Masukan Bagi Indonesia

Ratna Galuh Manika Trisista, Farhana Farhana, Hamdan Azhar Siregar
{"title":"Perbandingan Ketentuan Pidana Legislasi Nasional Negara Sponsor Eksplorasi Deep-seabed Mining Pada International Seabed Authority : Masukan Bagi Indonesia","authors":"Ratna Galuh Manika Trisista, Farhana Farhana, Hamdan Azhar Siregar","doi":"10.30641/dejure.2023.v23.375-388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"National legislation is the requirement established by the International Seabed Authority (ISA) for each country sponsoring Deep-seabed Mining (DSM) and criminal provisions and sanctions are an inseparable part of it. A total of 38 countries are listed as sponsor countries, while Indonesia, with its potential as a maritime country and member of UNCLOS 1982, has not participated in DSM activities. This article aims to explore and compare the criminal provisions in the national legislation of sponsoring countries that have been approved by the ISA so that the formulation of sanctions in Indonesian national legislation can be illustrated in order to prepare Indonesia’s contribution as a sponsoring country for DSM activities in the International Seabed Area. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and comparative approach. The research results show that the majority of sponsoring countries in their criminal provisions stipulate criminal sanctions in the form of fines as well as the possibility of imprisonment and several administrative sanctions. Based on the results of this comparative study, it can be concluded that the formulation of sanctions that can be regulated in Indonesian national legislation is a maximum fine of more than 100 billion Rupiah and a maximum prison sentence of not less than 5 years, as well as additional criminal penalties and administrative sanctions in the form of termination or revocation of DSM activity permits, confiscation of profits resulting from illegal DSM acquisition, and compensation for environmental damage caused by DSM activities.","PeriodicalId":473010,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Penelitian Hukum de Jure","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Penelitian Hukum de Jure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2023.v23.375-388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

National legislation is the requirement established by the International Seabed Authority (ISA) for each country sponsoring Deep-seabed Mining (DSM) and criminal provisions and sanctions are an inseparable part of it. A total of 38 countries are listed as sponsor countries, while Indonesia, with its potential as a maritime country and member of UNCLOS 1982, has not participated in DSM activities. This article aims to explore and compare the criminal provisions in the national legislation of sponsoring countries that have been approved by the ISA so that the formulation of sanctions in Indonesian national legislation can be illustrated in order to prepare Indonesia’s contribution as a sponsoring country for DSM activities in the International Seabed Area. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and comparative approach. The research results show that the majority of sponsoring countries in their criminal provisions stipulate criminal sanctions in the form of fines as well as the possibility of imprisonment and several administrative sanctions. Based on the results of this comparative study, it can be concluded that the formulation of sanctions that can be regulated in Indonesian national legislation is a maximum fine of more than 100 billion Rupiah and a maximum prison sentence of not less than 5 years, as well as additional criminal penalties and administrative sanctions in the form of termination or revocation of DSM activity permits, confiscation of profits resulting from illegal DSM acquisition, and compensation for environmental damage caused by DSM activities.
国家国家立法对国际海运管理局深海运勘探结果的比较:印度尼西亚的输入
国家立法是国际海底管理局为赞助深海底采矿的每一个国家制定的要求,刑事规定和制裁是其中不可分割的一部分。共有38个国家被列为主办国,而印度尼西亚作为一个有潜力的海洋国家和1982年联合国海洋法公约的成员,尚未参加DSM活动。本文旨在探讨和比较经国际海底管理局批准的赞助国国家立法中的刑事规定,以便说明印度尼西亚国家立法中制裁的制定情况,以便印度尼西亚作为国际海底区DSM活动的赞助国作出贡献。采用的研究方法是规范司法与成文法和比较法。研究结果表明,大多数提案国在其刑法规定中规定了罚款形式的刑事制裁,以及监禁和几种行政制裁的可能性。根据这一比较研究的结果,可以得出结论,在印度尼西亚国家立法中可以规定的制裁的制定是最高1000亿印尼盾以上的罚款和最高不少于5年的监禁,以及以终止或撤销DSM活动许可证,没收非法获得DSM的利润的形式进行的额外刑事处罚和行政制裁,以及对用电需求管理活动造成的环境损害进行赔偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信