Mending the Research-Policy-Practice Gap: Conceptualising Research as Social Change in Education

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Shyam Anand Singh, Ching Leen Chiam, David Jun-Song Huang, Wei Loong David Hung
{"title":"Mending the Research-Policy-Practice Gap: Conceptualising Research as Social Change in Education","authors":"Shyam Anand Singh, Ching Leen Chiam, David Jun-Song Huang, Wei Loong David Hung","doi":"10.17159/2221-4070/2023/v12i2a9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a widely acknowledged gap between research, policy, and practice owing to a lack of capacity to translate and mobilise research results to end-users including policymakers, practitioners, and community members. Acknowledging the divide amongst researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, this conceptual paper seeks to address the following: How do we devise ways to strengthen the research-policy-practice nexus in the education landscape such that research institutions can better attend to the needs of policymakers and practitioners? How can we facilitate greater interaction among researchers, policymakers, practitioners, and other stakeholders to create a common understanding of the challenges, needs, and what works for all stakeholders? To do this, we propose a new approach that employs research as a mechanism for social change and uses the consciousness of the self as a resource for research. More specifically, we develop a framework that facilitates the conditions for the mutual understanding of norms, operational roles, academic rigour, and policy and practice outcomes among all stakeholders. Additionally, this framework seeks to foster increased inter-stakeholder conversations and dialogues to narrow the divide between researchers and policymakers and, correspondingly, improve policy translations from academic research.","PeriodicalId":43084,"journal":{"name":"Educational Research for Social Change","volume":"1 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Research for Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2221-4070/2023/v12i2a9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a widely acknowledged gap between research, policy, and practice owing to a lack of capacity to translate and mobilise research results to end-users including policymakers, practitioners, and community members. Acknowledging the divide amongst researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, this conceptual paper seeks to address the following: How do we devise ways to strengthen the research-policy-practice nexus in the education landscape such that research institutions can better attend to the needs of policymakers and practitioners? How can we facilitate greater interaction among researchers, policymakers, practitioners, and other stakeholders to create a common understanding of the challenges, needs, and what works for all stakeholders? To do this, we propose a new approach that employs research as a mechanism for social change and uses the consciousness of the self as a resource for research. More specifically, we develop a framework that facilitates the conditions for the mutual understanding of norms, operational roles, academic rigour, and policy and practice outcomes among all stakeholders. Additionally, this framework seeks to foster increased inter-stakeholder conversations and dialogues to narrow the divide between researchers and policymakers and, correspondingly, improve policy translations from academic research.
弥补研究-政策-实践的差距:将研究概念化为教育中的社会变革
由于缺乏将研究成果转化和动员给最终用户(包括决策者、从业者和社区成员)的能力,研究、政策和实践之间存在着广泛承认的差距。承认研究者、政策制定者和实践者之间的分歧,这篇概念性论文试图解决以下问题:我们如何设计方法来加强教育领域的研究-政策-实践联系,使研究机构能够更好地满足政策制定者和实践者的需求?我们如何促进研究人员、政策制定者、从业者和其他利益相关者之间更大的互动,以形成对挑战、需求和对所有利益相关者有效的方法的共同理解?为了做到这一点,我们提出了一种新的方法,将研究作为社会变革的机制,并将自我意识作为研究的资源。更具体地说,我们开发了一个框架,为所有利益相关者之间对规范、操作角色、学术严谨性以及政策和实践成果的相互理解创造了条件。此外,该框架旨在促进更多的利益相关者之间的对话和对话,以缩小研究人员和政策制定者之间的鸿沟,并相应地改善学术研究的政策翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Research for Social Change
Educational Research for Social Change EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信