Evaluation of CoronaVac and CoviShield Vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers in Salvador, Brazil

COVID Pub Date : 2023-10-27 DOI:10.3390/covid3110112
Jesús Enrique Patiño Escarcina, Felipe de Jesus Souza, Ana Keila Carvalho Vieira Da Silva, Keile Kemyly Assis Da Silva, Ruan Barbosa Souza, Saulo Reis Nery Santos, Eduardo M. Netto
{"title":"Evaluation of CoronaVac and CoviShield Vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Healthcare Workers in Salvador, Brazil","authors":"Jesús Enrique Patiño Escarcina, Felipe de Jesus Souza, Ana Keila Carvalho Vieira Da Silva, Keile Kemyly Assis Da Silva, Ruan Barbosa Souza, Saulo Reis Nery Santos, Eduardo M. Netto","doi":"10.3390/covid3110112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence and rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant in Brazil have raised concerns about SARS-CoV-2 vaccines’ neutralizing capacity and viral load impact. Our study aimed to assess the influence of the CoviShield and CoronaVac vaccines on the Ct-N2 value in the healthcare organization’s staff who experienced primary SARS-CoV-2 infection. We examined sixty-three COVID-19 cases reported in the first half of 2021 and identified similar clinical and laboratory characteristics among individuals, regardless of the vaccine they received. Surprisingly, our observations revealed that both CoviShield and CoronaVac vaccines had no impact on viral load or the development and severity of symptoms. These findings suggest a potential reduction in neutralizing response and indicate the need to consider the incorporation of other SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and maintain additional containment measures against SARS-CoV-2, as they remain imperative despite vaccination efforts.","PeriodicalId":72714,"journal":{"name":"COVID","volume":"212 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COVID","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/covid3110112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence and rapid spread of the SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant in Brazil have raised concerns about SARS-CoV-2 vaccines’ neutralizing capacity and viral load impact. Our study aimed to assess the influence of the CoviShield and CoronaVac vaccines on the Ct-N2 value in the healthcare organization’s staff who experienced primary SARS-CoV-2 infection. We examined sixty-three COVID-19 cases reported in the first half of 2021 and identified similar clinical and laboratory characteristics among individuals, regardless of the vaccine they received. Surprisingly, our observations revealed that both CoviShield and CoronaVac vaccines had no impact on viral load or the development and severity of symptoms. These findings suggest a potential reduction in neutralizing response and indicate the need to consider the incorporation of other SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and maintain additional containment measures against SARS-CoV-2, as they remain imperative despite vaccination efforts.
CoronaVac和CoviShield疫苗对巴西萨尔瓦多医护人员SARS-CoV-2感染的评估
SARS-CoV-2 γ变体在巴西的出现和迅速传播引发了人们对SARS-CoV-2疫苗的中和能力和病毒载量影响的担忧。本研究旨在评估CoviShield和CoronaVac疫苗对医疗机构中经历过原发性SARS-CoV-2感染的工作人员Ct-N2值的影响。我们检查了2021年上半年报告的63例COVID-19病例,并确定了个体之间相似的临床和实验室特征,无论他们接种了何种疫苗。令人惊讶的是,我们的观察显示,CoviShield和CoronaVac疫苗对病毒载量或症状的发展和严重程度没有影响。这些发现表明,中和反应可能会减少,并表明有必要考虑合并其他SARS-CoV-2疫苗,并保持针对SARS-CoV-2的额外遏制措施,因为尽管努力接种疫苗,这些措施仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信