Edifying the Body: Troubling Notions of Impact When Discussing EAQ's Intellectual Structure

IF 2.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Alounso Gilzene
{"title":"Edifying the Body: Troubling Notions of Impact When Discussing EAQ's Intellectual Structure","authors":"Alounso Gilzene","doi":"10.1177/0013161x231201826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An Empirical Reflection on Educational Administration Quarterly’s Distinctive Contributions to the Field, 1965–2020 evaluated the impact of Educational Administration Quarterly using bibliometrics (EAQ). The authors in an analysis of articles from 1965 to 2020 highlighted scholars who made significant contributions to the journal. The outcomes, together with the most cited EAQ articles were then leveraged to infer the corpus’ essential features. While the information presented was important there were some key issues the interpretation. In this response, I questioned the concept of impact through a discussion of bias in citations and examined some of the limitations of the authors’ conception of social justice work, one of the schools of thought mentioned in the EAQ Intellectual framework.","PeriodicalId":48091,"journal":{"name":"Educational Administration Quarterly","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Administration Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161x231201826","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An Empirical Reflection on Educational Administration Quarterly’s Distinctive Contributions to the Field, 1965–2020 evaluated the impact of Educational Administration Quarterly using bibliometrics (EAQ). The authors in an analysis of articles from 1965 to 2020 highlighted scholars who made significant contributions to the journal. The outcomes, together with the most cited EAQ articles were then leveraged to infer the corpus’ essential features. While the information presented was important there were some key issues the interpretation. In this response, I questioned the concept of impact through a discussion of bias in citations and examined some of the limitations of the authors’ conception of social justice work, one of the schools of thought mentioned in the EAQ Intellectual framework.
陶冶身体:在讨论EAQ的知识结构时令人不安的影响概念
《教育管理季刊》1965-2020年在该领域独特贡献的实证反思:运用文献计量学(EAQ)评价《教育管理季刊》的影响。作者在对1965年至2020年的文章进行分析时,突出了对该杂志做出重大贡献的学者。然后利用结果以及引用最多的EAQ文章来推断语料库的基本特征。虽然所提供的资料很重要,但在解释方面存在一些关键问题。在这篇文章中,我通过讨论引文中的偏见对影响的概念提出了质疑,并检查了作者的社会正义工作概念的一些局限性,社会正义工作是EAQ智力框架中提到的思想流派之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Educational Administration Quarterly
Educational Administration Quarterly EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Educational Administration Quarterly presents prominent empirical and conceptual articles focused on timely and critical leadership and policy issues of educational organizations. As an editorial team, we embrace traditional and emergent research paradigms, methods, and issues. We particularly promote the publication of rigorous and relevant scholarly work that enhances linkages among and utility for educational policy, practice, and research arenas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信