Administrative leadership priorities and their impact on improving employee performance: An exploratory study of the opinions of a sample of employees at general fertilizer Industry Company in Basra
{"title":"Administrative leadership priorities and their impact on improving employee performance: An exploratory study of the opinions of a sample of employees at general fertilizer Industry Company in Basra","authors":"Raad Abduljabbar AL-Hameed","doi":"10.54660/ijsser.2023.2.5.39-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to discover the relationship of influence between the dimensions of administrative leadership priorities (interest in employees, trust in performance, confidence, participation in decision-making, time management) as an independent variable and employee performance as a dependent variable. The study expressed the problem through a set of questions focused on whether there is a correlation and impact relationship between the study variables. Accordingly, a hypothetical model was developed from which the main hypotheses of the study stemmed. To test the validity of the hypotheses, data was collected through a questionnaire prepared for this purpose, and a sample of (200) individuals was selected from the leaders, department heads and section heads in the company under study. In light of the results, the researcher reached a set of conclusions: Administrative leadership priorities are one of the best orientations as a new pattern that relies on positive ideas and principles that create a way of working that makes the leader a person who serves subordinates by gaining their trust and helping them achieve their interests instead of being a person who controls their capabilities. The study recommended many recommendations, most notably: Working to set real priorities for the dimensions of leadership priorities and show their reflections on self-efficiency, taking into account that the influential value of each dimension of administrative leadership priorities has a role in employee performance, i.e. these dimensions should be adopted and the preference between them should be approved according to realistic indicators.","PeriodicalId":500134,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Science Exceptional Research","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Science Exceptional Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54660/ijsser.2023.2.5.39-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The study aims to discover the relationship of influence between the dimensions of administrative leadership priorities (interest in employees, trust in performance, confidence, participation in decision-making, time management) as an independent variable and employee performance as a dependent variable. The study expressed the problem through a set of questions focused on whether there is a correlation and impact relationship between the study variables. Accordingly, a hypothetical model was developed from which the main hypotheses of the study stemmed. To test the validity of the hypotheses, data was collected through a questionnaire prepared for this purpose, and a sample of (200) individuals was selected from the leaders, department heads and section heads in the company under study. In light of the results, the researcher reached a set of conclusions: Administrative leadership priorities are one of the best orientations as a new pattern that relies on positive ideas and principles that create a way of working that makes the leader a person who serves subordinates by gaining their trust and helping them achieve their interests instead of being a person who controls their capabilities. The study recommended many recommendations, most notably: Working to set real priorities for the dimensions of leadership priorities and show their reflections on self-efficiency, taking into account that the influential value of each dimension of administrative leadership priorities has a role in employee performance, i.e. these dimensions should be adopted and the preference between them should be approved according to realistic indicators.