VLADIMIR-SUZDAL MATERIAL OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 12TH CENTURY IN THE KIEVAN CHRONICL

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
T. V. Guimon
{"title":"VLADIMIR-SUZDAL MATERIAL OF THE SECOND HALF OF THE 12TH CENTURY IN THE KIEVAN CHRONICL","authors":"T. V. Guimon","doi":"10.17072/2219-3111-2023-1-89-101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pre-Mongolian annalistic writing of Northeastern Rus is reflected in the Laurentian Chronicle and some other texts close to it. However, one finds much material from the Vladimir-Suzdal Land in the (generally Southern) Hypatian Chronicle, in its annals for the second half of the 12th century. This material is textually close to the corresponding fragments of the Laurentian Chronicle, although many substantial differences exist. This paper develops T.L. Vilkul’s hypothesis that the basic source used by the compiler of the Kievan Chronicle (the 12th-century section of the Hypatian Chronicle) was an annalistic text from the Northeast (which, in turn, contained much Southern material). The Laurentian Chronicle better preserves this text, while in the Kievan Chronicle it was much amplified. Two main conclusions are made in the paper. Firstly, the Northeastern source of the Kievan Chronicle was an earlier version of the Vladimir annals than the version preserved by the Laurentian Chronicle (which, in turn, is an earlier version in comparison with the text of c. 1205 reflected by the Radzivill Chronicle, the Moscow Academy Chronicle, and the Chronicle of Pereyaslavl of Suzdal). Therefore, there was one more editorial episode in the life of the Vladimir annals, at some point around 1200. Secondly, additions made to this source by the compiler of the Kievan Chronicle are significant. They concern the history of the Dormition Cathedral of Vladimir, the naming of children in the family of Vsevolod of Vladimir, and some other topics. As the compiler was a (younger) contemporary of events in question, his additions may be reliable.","PeriodicalId":41257,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Istoriya-Perm University Herald-History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/2219-3111-2023-1-89-101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pre-Mongolian annalistic writing of Northeastern Rus is reflected in the Laurentian Chronicle and some other texts close to it. However, one finds much material from the Vladimir-Suzdal Land in the (generally Southern) Hypatian Chronicle, in its annals for the second half of the 12th century. This material is textually close to the corresponding fragments of the Laurentian Chronicle, although many substantial differences exist. This paper develops T.L. Vilkul’s hypothesis that the basic source used by the compiler of the Kievan Chronicle (the 12th-century section of the Hypatian Chronicle) was an annalistic text from the Northeast (which, in turn, contained much Southern material). The Laurentian Chronicle better preserves this text, while in the Kievan Chronicle it was much amplified. Two main conclusions are made in the paper. Firstly, the Northeastern source of the Kievan Chronicle was an earlier version of the Vladimir annals than the version preserved by the Laurentian Chronicle (which, in turn, is an earlier version in comparison with the text of c. 1205 reflected by the Radzivill Chronicle, the Moscow Academy Chronicle, and the Chronicle of Pereyaslavl of Suzdal). Therefore, there was one more editorial episode in the life of the Vladimir annals, at some point around 1200. Secondly, additions made to this source by the compiler of the Kievan Chronicle are significant. They concern the history of the Dormition Cathedral of Vladimir, the naming of children in the family of Vsevolod of Vladimir, and some other topics. As the compiler was a (younger) contemporary of events in question, his additions may be reliable.
12世纪下半叶基辅编年史中的Vladimir-suzdal材料
前蒙古时期东北罗斯的编年史在《劳伦森编年史》和其他一些与之相近的文献中有所反映。然而,人们在12世纪下半叶的希帕蒂亚编年史(通常是南部)中发现了许多来自弗拉基米尔-苏兹达尔地区的材料。这种材料在文本上接近劳伦森编年史的相应片段,尽管存在许多实质性的差异。本文发展了T.L. Vilkul的假设,即《基辅编年史》(希帕提亚编年史的12世纪部分)的编纂者使用的基本来源是来自东北的编年史文本(反过来,其中包含了许多南方材料)。《劳伦森编年史》更好地保存了这段文字,而《基辅编年史》则大大放大了这段文字。本文主要得出了两个结论。首先,基辅编年史的东北来源是弗拉基米尔编年史的早期版本,而不是劳伦森编年史保存的版本(反过来,与Radzivill编年史,莫斯科学院编年史和苏兹达尔的Pereyaslavl编年史所反映的约1205年的文本相比,后者是一个更早的版本)。因此,在弗拉季米尔编年史中又出现了一个编辑章节,大约在1200年左右。其次,《基辅纪事报》编纂者对这一来源所作的补充是重要的。它们涉及弗拉基米尔圣母堂的历史,弗拉基米尔的弗谢沃洛德家族的孩子的命名,以及其他一些话题。由于编译器与所讨论的事件(较年轻)同时代,因此他添加的内容可能是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信