Laboratory Assessment of Antibacterial Efficacy of Five Different Herbal-based Potential Endodontic Irrigants

IF 0.4 Q4 BIOLOGY
Anjali A Oak, Kailash Attur, Kamal Bagda, Nitish Mathur, Lubna Mohammad, Nikhat M Attar
{"title":"Laboratory Assessment of Antibacterial Efficacy of Five Different Herbal-based Potential Endodontic Irrigants","authors":"Anjali A Oak, Kailash Attur, Kamal Bagda, Nitish Mathur, Lubna Mohammad, Nikhat M Attar","doi":"10.4103/aihb.aihb_68_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Studies in the pharma industry have shown herbal plants as a potential source of bioactive compounds and antibacterial efficacy. These medicinal plants are also used in manufacturing modern medicines. This study is to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of various herbal extracts such as Azadirachta indica , Ocimum tenuiflorum , turmeric, Aloe vera and Morinda citrifolia as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis and compare with the sodium hypochlorite alone and that with ultrasonic irrigation – an in vitro study. Materials and Methods: A firsthand study was conducted to find the bacterial inhibition of E. faecalis of herbal extracts. For this purpose, 30 samples were extracted and suspended with E. faecalis for each of the seven groups. The irrigating groups were divided into five herbal groups: A. indica , O. tenuiflorum , turmeric, Aloe vera and M. citrifolia . It was formed to determine the alternative against the two other groups, sodium hypochlorite alone and sodium hypochlorite, with ultrasonic irrigation. The readings (zone of inhibition) obtained from the agar well diffusion method were subjected to the statistical analysis using the SPSS software (19.0), wherein analysis of variance was used. The P value was set at 0.05. Results: The study demonstrated that A. indica was highly efficient amongst the herbal groups studied against E. faecalis . It was better than other extracts and comparable to sodium hypochlorite alone and with ultrasonic irrigation. The average zone of inhibition for the stated herbal ingredient was better than the commercially used chemical ones. However, there was no statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05) between all the groups studied. The null hypothesis was hence not rejected. Conclusions: The five strong herbal irrigants such as A. indica , O. tenuiflorum , turmeric, Aloe vera and M. citrifolia were found to be the better alternatives against sodium hypochlorite alone and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic irrigation. The experiment conducted proved positive with mean results.","PeriodicalId":7341,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Human Biology","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aihb.aihb_68_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Studies in the pharma industry have shown herbal plants as a potential source of bioactive compounds and antibacterial efficacy. These medicinal plants are also used in manufacturing modern medicines. This study is to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy of various herbal extracts such as Azadirachta indica , Ocimum tenuiflorum , turmeric, Aloe vera and Morinda citrifolia as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis and compare with the sodium hypochlorite alone and that with ultrasonic irrigation – an in vitro study. Materials and Methods: A firsthand study was conducted to find the bacterial inhibition of E. faecalis of herbal extracts. For this purpose, 30 samples were extracted and suspended with E. faecalis for each of the seven groups. The irrigating groups were divided into five herbal groups: A. indica , O. tenuiflorum , turmeric, Aloe vera and M. citrifolia . It was formed to determine the alternative against the two other groups, sodium hypochlorite alone and sodium hypochlorite, with ultrasonic irrigation. The readings (zone of inhibition) obtained from the agar well diffusion method were subjected to the statistical analysis using the SPSS software (19.0), wherein analysis of variance was used. The P value was set at 0.05. Results: The study demonstrated that A. indica was highly efficient amongst the herbal groups studied against E. faecalis . It was better than other extracts and comparable to sodium hypochlorite alone and with ultrasonic irrigation. The average zone of inhibition for the stated herbal ingredient was better than the commercially used chemical ones. However, there was no statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05) between all the groups studied. The null hypothesis was hence not rejected. Conclusions: The five strong herbal irrigants such as A. indica , O. tenuiflorum , turmeric, Aloe vera and M. citrifolia were found to be the better alternatives against sodium hypochlorite alone and sodium hypochlorite with ultrasonic irrigation. The experiment conducted proved positive with mean results.
五种不同草药基潜在根管冲洗剂抗菌效果的实验室评价
导读:制药行业的研究表明,草药植物是生物活性化合物和抗菌功效的潜在来源。这些药用植物也被用于制造现代药物。本研究旨在评价印楝、芦花、姜黄、芦荟、桑葚等不同草药提取物对粪肠球菌根管冲洗液的抗菌效果,并与次氯酸钠单独冲洗和超声冲洗进行体外比较。材料与方法:对中药提取物对粪肠杆菌的抑菌作用进行了初步研究。为此,7组各取30份样品,用粪肠杆菌悬浮。灌水组分为5个草本植物组:籼稻组、天竺葵组、姜黄组、芦荟组和枸杞组。它的形成是为了与另外两组,次氯酸钠单独和次氯酸钠进行超声波冲洗。琼脂孔扩散法获得的读数(抑制区)使用SPSS软件(19.0)进行统计分析,其中采用方差分析。P值设为0.05。结果:籼稻对粪肠杆菌的抑菌效果较好。其效果优于其他提取物,可与次氯酸钠单独和超声冲洗相媲美。所述中药成分的平均抑制范围优于市售化学成分。但两组间差异无统计学意义(P <0.05)。因此,零假设没有被拒绝。结论:对次氯酸钠单独冲洗和次氯酸钠联合超声冲洗具有较好的替代效果,籼米、天花莲、姜黄、芦荟和枸杞5种强药液冲洗效果较好。所进行的实验证明是积极的,结果一般。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信