BEING A DOCTORAL STUDENT IN MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DOCTORAL STUDENTS

Seda DEMİR
{"title":"BEING A DOCTORAL STUDENT IN MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF DOCTORAL STUDENTS","authors":"Seda DEMİR","doi":"10.48166/ejaes.1357499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims to examine the views of doctorate students and graduate doctoral students who have received or are receiving doctoral education in the field of measurement and evaluation in education. Phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the study. The participants of the study consisted of 24 participants who had completed their doctoral education in the field of Measurement and Evaluation in Education at three different state universities (n=11) or were continuing their doctoral education (n=13). The data were gathered during the fall semester of 2022-2023 academic year via a semi-structured interview form prepared by the researcher and consisting of five open-ended items. Content analysis was used for analysis of the data gathered. The results showed that students' views about the factors leading them to pursue an academic career were grouped under three themes as “having interest in the field”, “desire for academic achievement”, and “career goals.” Two themes, “guidance and mentorship” and “academic support” were identified for students' views on their learning relationships with their supervisors. It was seen that students' views about their academic experiences were grouped under three themes as “research activities”, “teaching experiences”, and “academic development.” In addition, students' views on the skills provided by their supervisors were grouped under the themes of “research skills”, “higher-order thinking skills”, and “pedagogical and teaching skills”. Lastly, three themes, “technical competencies”, “theoretical knowledge”, and “practical skills” were identified for the participants' views on the requirements they needed during their doctoral education.","PeriodicalId":471129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of advanced education studies","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of advanced education studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48166/ejaes.1357499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aims to examine the views of doctorate students and graduate doctoral students who have received or are receiving doctoral education in the field of measurement and evaluation in education. Phenomenological design, one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the study. The participants of the study consisted of 24 participants who had completed their doctoral education in the field of Measurement and Evaluation in Education at three different state universities (n=11) or were continuing their doctoral education (n=13). The data were gathered during the fall semester of 2022-2023 academic year via a semi-structured interview form prepared by the researcher and consisting of five open-ended items. Content analysis was used for analysis of the data gathered. The results showed that students' views about the factors leading them to pursue an academic career were grouped under three themes as “having interest in the field”, “desire for academic achievement”, and “career goals.” Two themes, “guidance and mentorship” and “academic support” were identified for students' views on their learning relationships with their supervisors. It was seen that students' views about their academic experiences were grouped under three themes as “research activities”, “teaching experiences”, and “academic development.” In addition, students' views on the skills provided by their supervisors were grouped under the themes of “research skills”, “higher-order thinking skills”, and “pedagogical and teaching skills”. Lastly, three themes, “technical competencies”, “theoretical knowledge”, and “practical skills” were identified for the participants' views on the requirements they needed during their doctoral education.
教育测量与评价中的博士生身份:博士生视角下的现象学研究
本研究旨在探讨已接受或正在接受博士教育的博士生和研究生对教育测量与评估领域的看法。本研究采用定性研究方法之一的现象学设计。该研究的参与者包括24名参与者,他们在三所不同的州立大学完成了教育测量与评估领域的博士教育(n=11)或正在继续他们的博士教育(n=13)。数据是在2022-2023学年的秋季学期通过研究人员准备的半结构化访谈表格收集的,该表格由五个开放式项目组成。采用内容分析法对收集到的数据进行分析。调查结果显示,学生对促使他们从事学术事业的因素的看法分为三个主题:“对该领域的兴趣”、“对学术成就的渴望”和“职业目标”。学生对导师的学习关系的看法分为“指导与师徒关系”和“学术支持”两个主题。调查发现,学生对其学术经历的看法分为“研究活动”、“教学经历”和“学术发展”三个主题。此外,学生对导师提供的技能的看法分为“研究技能”、“高阶思维技能”和“教学技能”三个主题。最后,确定了三个主题,即“技术能力”、“理论知识”和“实践技能”,以表达参与者对博士教育所需要求的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信