Comparison of Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression in Sentiment Analysis on Marketplace Reviews Using Rating-Based Labeling

Satya Abdul Halim Bahtiar, Chandra Kusuma Dewa, Ahmad Luthfi
{"title":"Comparison of Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression in Sentiment Analysis on Marketplace Reviews Using Rating-Based Labeling","authors":"Satya Abdul Halim Bahtiar, Chandra Kusuma Dewa, Ahmad Luthfi","doi":"10.51519/journalisi.v5i3.539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focuses on sentiment analysis in the marketplace reviews in Google Play Store, a platform for downloading Android applications and providing reviews. Sentiment analysis is essential for understanding user responses to applications, particularly in the app marketplace. In this study, two machine learning algorithms, Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression, are employed to classify user reviews. The application rating is used as a reference to determine the sentiment of each comment. The dataset is divided into two conditions: using 2 labels (positive & negative) and 3 labels (positive, neutral, & negative). The test results indicate that the highest performance is achieved by classifying with Logistic Regression on the Shopee dataset with 2 labels. The accuracy reaches 84.58%, precision reaches 84.66%, and recall reaches 84.63%. Additionally, the fastest processing time occurs when testing the Lazada 2-label dataset with Naïve Bayes, taking only 0.038 seconds. Overall, the research suggests that datasets with 2 labels tend to yield higher accuracy compared to datasets with 3 labels.","PeriodicalId":33075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Information Systems and Informatics","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Information Systems and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v5i3.539","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research focuses on sentiment analysis in the marketplace reviews in Google Play Store, a platform for downloading Android applications and providing reviews. Sentiment analysis is essential for understanding user responses to applications, particularly in the app marketplace. In this study, two machine learning algorithms, Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression, are employed to classify user reviews. The application rating is used as a reference to determine the sentiment of each comment. The dataset is divided into two conditions: using 2 labels (positive & negative) and 3 labels (positive, neutral, & negative). The test results indicate that the highest performance is achieved by classifying with Logistic Regression on the Shopee dataset with 2 labels. The accuracy reaches 84.58%, precision reaches 84.66%, and recall reaches 84.63%. Additionally, the fastest processing time occurs when testing the Lazada 2-label dataset with Naïve Bayes, taking only 0.038 seconds. Overall, the research suggests that datasets with 2 labels tend to yield higher accuracy compared to datasets with 3 labels.
Naïve贝叶斯和逻辑回归在基于评级标签的市场评论情感分析中的比较
本研究主要关注Google Play Store (Android应用下载和评论平台)市场评论的情感分析。情感分析对于理解用户对应用的反应至关重要,尤其是在应用市场中。本研究采用Naïve贝叶斯和Logistic回归两种机器学习算法对用户评论进行分类。应用程序评级被用作确定每个评论的情绪的参考。数据集分为两种情况:使用2个标签(正&负极)和3个标签(正极、中性、&负面的)。测试结果表明,在带有2个标签的Shopee数据集上使用Logistic回归进行分类可以达到最高的性能。准确率达到84.58%,精密度达到84.66%,召回率达到84.63%。此外,当使用Naïve Bayes测试Lazada 2标签数据集时,处理时间最快,只需0.038秒。总的来说,研究表明,与具有3个标签的数据集相比,具有2个标签的数据集往往产生更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书