Differences between Subjective Effects and Oral Conditions of Subjects According to Brushing Methods

Hye-Jin Kim, Kyung-Min Kim
{"title":"Differences between Subjective Effects and Oral Conditions of Subjects According to Brushing Methods","authors":"Hye-Jin Kim, Kyung-Min Kim","doi":"10.33615/jkohs.2023.11.3.120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This Study was conducted to find out the effects on the oral cavity and the subjective effects of subjects between brushing methods based on the Bass’ method.
 Methods: From May 4 to May 11, 2023, Group2 was trained on rotational and random methods based on the Bass’ method, and an evaluation was conducted one week later.
 Results: BOP, O’Leary index, and BB check levels were reduced for both Bass’+Rolling method and Bass’+Random method.
 Conclusions: The Rolling method may not necessarily be an advantageous method of brushing teeth, and repeated brushing education and efforts by dental hygienists for follow-up care are required to change tooth brushing.","PeriodicalId":496938,"journal":{"name":"한국구강보건과학회지","volume":"160 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"한국구강보건과학회지","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33615/jkohs.2023.11.3.120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This Study was conducted to find out the effects on the oral cavity and the subjective effects of subjects between brushing methods based on the Bass’ method. Methods: From May 4 to May 11, 2023, Group2 was trained on rotational and random methods based on the Bass’ method, and an evaluation was conducted one week later. Results: BOP, O’Leary index, and BB check levels were reduced for both Bass’+Rolling method and Bass’+Random method. Conclusions: The Rolling method may not necessarily be an advantageous method of brushing teeth, and repeated brushing education and efforts by dental hygienists for follow-up care are required to change tooth brushing.
不同刷牙方法对受试者主观效果和口腔状况的影响
目的:研究基于Bass方法的不同刷牙方式对口腔的影响及被试的主观影响。 方法:2023年5月4日至5月11日,根据Bass方法对第2组进行轮换和随机训练,并于1周后进行评估。 结果:Bass’+Rolling法和Bass’+Random法均降低了BOP、O’leary指数和BB检查水平。 结论:滚动法不一定是一种有利的刷牙方法,需要反复的刷牙教育和口腔卫生员的后续护理努力来改变刷牙方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信