Accuracy and safety of deep brain stimulation assisted by a neurosurgical robot attachable to the operating table

Q4 Medicine
Subin Cheon, Inje Jo, Jinyoung Youn, Jin Whan Cho, Kyung Rae Cho, Jung-Il Lee
{"title":"Accuracy and safety of deep brain stimulation assisted by a neurosurgical robot attachable to the operating table","authors":"Subin Cheon, Inje Jo, Jinyoung Youn, Jin Whan Cho, Kyung Rae Cho, Jung-Il Lee","doi":"10.52662/jksfn.2023.00052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Neurosurgical robots have recently been introduced to assist in guiding trajectories to achieve accurate targeting. This study investigated the accuracy of robot-assisted deep brain stimulation (DBS) compared with conventional DBS using the Leksell arc system.Methods: Between October 2020 and September 2021, 29 patients underwent DBS using the Leksell arc system, while from October 2021 to August 2022, 20 patients underwent DBS using a neurosurgical robot system (KYMERO; Koh Young Technology). Radial errors, total operative time (surgery time, preparation time), and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups through a retrospective analysis. Results: Radial errors were significantly smaller in robot-assisted DBS (1.63±0.39 mm vs. 1.01±0.39 mm, p<0.01). Furthermore, the error of the second implantation was smaller than in the Leksell DBS group (0.216 vs. 0.005 mm, p<0.001). The total operative time of DBS with Leksell frame was 3.47 hours (range, 2.38-5.85 hours) and the surgery time was 2.21 hours (range, 1.08-4.67 hours), while the total operative time in the robot group was 3.92 hours (range, 2.75-5.85 hours) and the surgical time was 2.60 hours (range, 1.02-4.67 hours) (p=0.055, p=0.258, respectively). The clinical outcome did not show a significant difference according to the surgical method.Conclusion: DBS with a robot-assisted system enables the accurate and consistent insertion of DBS electrodes with a lower error rate than the conventional method.","PeriodicalId":34983,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Dermatology","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52662/jksfn.2023.00052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neurosurgical robots have recently been introduced to assist in guiding trajectories to achieve accurate targeting. This study investigated the accuracy of robot-assisted deep brain stimulation (DBS) compared with conventional DBS using the Leksell arc system.Methods: Between October 2020 and September 2021, 29 patients underwent DBS using the Leksell arc system, while from October 2021 to August 2022, 20 patients underwent DBS using a neurosurgical robot system (KYMERO; Koh Young Technology). Radial errors, total operative time (surgery time, preparation time), and clinical outcomes were compared between both groups through a retrospective analysis. Results: Radial errors were significantly smaller in robot-assisted DBS (1.63±0.39 mm vs. 1.01±0.39 mm, p<0.01). Furthermore, the error of the second implantation was smaller than in the Leksell DBS group (0.216 vs. 0.005 mm, p<0.001). The total operative time of DBS with Leksell frame was 3.47 hours (range, 2.38-5.85 hours) and the surgery time was 2.21 hours (range, 1.08-4.67 hours), while the total operative time in the robot group was 3.92 hours (range, 2.75-5.85 hours) and the surgical time was 2.60 hours (range, 1.02-4.67 hours) (p=0.055, p=0.258, respectively). The clinical outcome did not show a significant difference according to the surgical method.Conclusion: DBS with a robot-assisted system enables the accurate and consistent insertion of DBS electrodes with a lower error rate than the conventional method.
附在手术台上的神经外科机器人辅助的深部脑刺激的准确性和安全性
目的:神经外科机器人最近被引入,以协助指导轨迹,以实现准确的目标。本研究探讨了机器人辅助深部脑刺激(DBS)与使用Leksell弧系统的常规DBS的准确性。方法:在2020年10月至2021年9月期间,29名患者使用Leksell arc系统接受了DBS,而在2021年10月至2022年8月期间,20名患者使用神经外科机器人系统(KYMERO;高扬科技)。通过回顾性分析比较两组患者桡骨误差、总手术时间(手术时间、准备时间)及临床结果。结果:机器人辅助DBS的径向误差明显较小(1.63±0.39 mm vs 1.01±0.39 mm, p<0.01)。此外,第二次植入的误差小于Leksell DBS组(0.216 vs. 0.005 mm, p<0.001)。Leksell框架DBS的总手术时间为3.47小时(范围,2.38 ~ 5.85小时),手术时间为2.21小时(范围,1.08 ~ 4.67小时),机器人组的总手术时间为3.92小时(范围,2.75 ~ 5.85小时),手术时间为2.60小时(范围,1.02 ~ 4.67小时)(p=0.055, p=0.258)。不同手术方式的临床结果无明显差异。结论:机器人辅助的DBS系统能使DBS电极的插入准确一致,错误率低于常规方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Dermatology
Korean Journal of Dermatology Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信