{"title":"The Effect of Practicum Tools with Differentiated Learning Strategies on Student Learning Outcomes","authors":"None Goldberd H D Sinaga, None Mariana Br Surbakti, None Morianus Gowasa, None Juliper Nainggolan, None Hebron Pardede, None Parlindungan Sitorus","doi":"10.29303/jpft.v9i2.5405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine the effect of using practicum tools with diferentiated learning strategies on student learning outcomes. The research method used is quasi-experimental design. The population in this study was all of class X MIA, totaling 212 students, of SMA Negeri 8 Medan. The research sampling technique is purposive sampling technique. Non-equivalent control group design is the type of the research design. The sample in the study consisted of an experimental class, namely class X MIA 6, and a control class, namely class X MIA 5. The experimental class was treated with differentiated learning strategies, while the control class was treated with conventional learning. The research instruments used were multiple-choice questions and student observation sheets. The average score of the posttest for the experimental class was 76.28 with a standard deviation of 6.9, and that of the control class was 72.08 with a standard deviation of 6.7. The pretest and posttest data obtained have been analyzed and met the prerequisites for testing the hypothesis, namely, the data is normally distributed and is homogeneous. The result of the right-tailed t-test on the hypothesis obtained the value of tcount > ttable, namely 2.608 > 2.002 whit = 0.05. Based on the testing criteria, the accepted hypothesis is H, which means that there is an effect of the treatment that is the use of practicum tool with different learning strategies on student learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 8 Medan for the 2022/2023 academic year. The result of the simple linear regression equation is Y = 65.9 + 0.34X.","PeriodicalId":34735,"journal":{"name":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","volume":"130 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v9i2.5405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aims to determine the effect of using practicum tools with diferentiated learning strategies on student learning outcomes. The research method used is quasi-experimental design. The population in this study was all of class X MIA, totaling 212 students, of SMA Negeri 8 Medan. The research sampling technique is purposive sampling technique. Non-equivalent control group design is the type of the research design. The sample in the study consisted of an experimental class, namely class X MIA 6, and a control class, namely class X MIA 5. The experimental class was treated with differentiated learning strategies, while the control class was treated with conventional learning. The research instruments used were multiple-choice questions and student observation sheets. The average score of the posttest for the experimental class was 76.28 with a standard deviation of 6.9, and that of the control class was 72.08 with a standard deviation of 6.7. The pretest and posttest data obtained have been analyzed and met the prerequisites for testing the hypothesis, namely, the data is normally distributed and is homogeneous. The result of the right-tailed t-test on the hypothesis obtained the value of tcount > ttable, namely 2.608 > 2.002 whit = 0.05. Based on the testing criteria, the accepted hypothesis is H, which means that there is an effect of the treatment that is the use of practicum tool with different learning strategies on student learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 8 Medan for the 2022/2023 academic year. The result of the simple linear regression equation is Y = 65.9 + 0.34X.
本研究旨在探讨使用不同学习策略的实习工具对学生学习成果的影响。研究方法为准实验设计。本研究人群为棉兰市SMA Negeri 8中学MIA X班全部212名学生。研究抽样技术是有目的抽样技术。非等效对照组设计是研究设计的一种。本研究样本由实验班即X MIA 6班和对照班即X MIA 5班组成。实验组采用差异化学习策略,对照组采用常规学习策略。使用的研究工具是选择题和学生观察表。实验班的后测平均分为76.28分,标准差为6.9;对照组的后测平均分为72.08分,标准差为6.7。对得到的前测和后测数据进行分析,并满足检验假设的前提条件,即数据呈正态分布,是均匀的。假设的右尾t检验结果为tcount >表,即2.608 >2.002白= 0.05。根据测试标准,接受的假设是H,这意味着在SMA Negeri 8 Medan的2022/2023学年,使用不同学习策略的实习工具对学生的学习成果有影响。简单线性回归方程的结果为Y = 65.9 + 0.34X。