Ethical Leadership at Work and with Friends and Family: Within-Person and Between-Raters Variability Matters

Michael Palanski, Michelle Hammond, Jayoung Kim, Gretchen Vogelgesang Lester, Rachel Clapp Smith
{"title":"Ethical Leadership at Work and with Friends and Family: Within-Person and Between-Raters Variability Matters","authors":"Michael Palanski, Michelle Hammond, Jayoung Kim, Gretchen Vogelgesang Lester, Rachel Clapp Smith","doi":"10.58315/jcld.v10.272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its theoretical grounding in the personal moral characteristics of leaders, most research on Brown et al.’s (2005) ethical leadership construct has tended to ignore the personal life (friends/family) aspects of leaders. In this study, we consider ethical leadership behavior in both work and non-work (i.e., with friends and family) domains at both the intra-individual (domain) and individual (leader as a whole person) levels of analysis. We examine our research questions with a sample of 104 leaders and their 1,458 raters in executive MBA programs in the United States and Ireland. Our findings demonstrate that ethical leadership operates at the individual level of analysis in both work and non-work contexts, with the implication that researchers should consider both the mean and variation of ethical leadership. Our findings also indicate strong within-domain and limited cross-domain effects of ethical leadership and ethical leadership variation on cognitive trust, affective trust, and abusive supervision.","PeriodicalId":481559,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Character and Leadership Development","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Character and Leadership Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58315/jcld.v10.272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite its theoretical grounding in the personal moral characteristics of leaders, most research on Brown et al.’s (2005) ethical leadership construct has tended to ignore the personal life (friends/family) aspects of leaders. In this study, we consider ethical leadership behavior in both work and non-work (i.e., with friends and family) domains at both the intra-individual (domain) and individual (leader as a whole person) levels of analysis. We examine our research questions with a sample of 104 leaders and their 1,458 raters in executive MBA programs in the United States and Ireland. Our findings demonstrate that ethical leadership operates at the individual level of analysis in both work and non-work contexts, with the implication that researchers should consider both the mean and variation of ethical leadership. Our findings also indicate strong within-domain and limited cross-domain effects of ethical leadership and ethical leadership variation on cognitive trust, affective trust, and abusive supervision.
工作和与朋友和家人的道德领导:个人内部和评价者之间的可变性问题
尽管其理论基础是领导者的个人道德特征,但大多数关于Brown等人(2005)的伦理领导结构的研究往往忽略了领导者的个人生活(朋友/家庭)方面。在本研究中,我们考虑工作和非工作(即与朋友和家人)领域的道德领导行为,并在个人内部(领域)和个人(作为一个整体的领导者)层面进行分析。我们对美国和爱尔兰emba项目的104名领导者及其1458名评分者进行了抽样调查,以检验我们的研究问题。我们的研究结果表明,在工作和非工作环境中,道德领导在个人层面的分析中都起作用,这意味着研究人员应该同时考虑道德领导的平均值和变异。我们的研究结果还表明,伦理型领导和伦理型领导变异对认知信任、情感信任和虐待性监督的影响在领域内很强,而跨领域的影响有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信